【摘要】：目的觀察迷迭香吸嗅方法在腦梗死后認(rèn)知障礙患者中的干預(yù)效果。 方法選取腦梗死后存在認(rèn)知障礙的患者66例，隨機(jī)分為三組，分別為吸嗅組、奧拉西坦組和對照組，每組均為22例。三組均給予常規(guī)治療，包括控制合并癥，預(yù)防并發(fā)癥，康復(fù)功能訓(xùn)練，物理因子治療以及活血擴(kuò)管藥物治療等。在此基礎(chǔ)上，吸嗅組予以迷迭香提取物吸嗅，0.4mL，用20ml常溫純凈水稀釋后放人擴(kuò)香儀托盤中，放在50cm×40cm×30cm的密閉塑料盒中，利用燈泡加熱，使用鼻導(dǎo)管一端開口于塑料盒，另一端放在患者鼻孔內(nèi)，吸入時間為30min，每天三次。奧拉西坦組予以奧拉西坦靜滴4g溶于250ml生理鹽水或5%葡萄糖水中，靜滴，每天一次。對照組予以常規(guī)治療外，不予特殊處理。三組療程均為4w。分別在干預(yù)前、干預(yù)2w、干預(yù)4w用MMSE（Mini-mental State Examination）及MBI（ModifiedBarthel Index）對三組患者進(jìn)行評定及療效評估，并記錄數(shù)據(jù)。數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)果應(yīng)用SPSS17.0軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計學(xué)分析。 結(jié)果①吸嗅組MMSE評分干預(yù)前后分別為13.18±3.83（干預(yù)前），16.72±2.93（干預(yù)2W），18.50±3.11（干預(yù)4w），MBI評分干預(yù)前后分別為41.04±6.33（干預(yù)前），54.54±6.70（干預(yù)2w），68.22±5.98（干預(yù)4w）。奧拉西坦組MMSE評分干預(yù)前后分別為11.90±4.15（干預(yù)前），17.13±4.34（干預(yù)2w），19.45±3.71（干預(yù)4w），MBI評分干預(yù)前后分別為39.18±4.96（干預(yù)前），53.50±6.02（干預(yù)2w），66.45±5.30（干預(yù)4w）。對照組MMSE評分分別為12.54±3.20（干預(yù)前），13.31±3.42（干預(yù)2w），14.72±3.46（干預(yù)4w），，MBI評分干預(yù)前后分別為39.31±5.25（干預(yù)前），48.31±4.33（干預(yù)2w），59.04±3.65（干預(yù)4w）。②吸嗅組和奧拉西坦組干預(yù)2w、4w的MMSE評分均較干預(yù)前升高（P0.05），而對照組干預(yù)前后的MMSE評分不具有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（P0.05）,兩組干預(yù)2w及4w的評分分別與對照組相比有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異（P0.05），且MMSE評分吸嗅組與奧拉西坦組比較無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異（P0.05)，但奧拉西坦組總有效率（86.36%）較吸嗅組（72.27%）高。③3組的MBI評分干預(yù)2w，4w均較干預(yù)前升高（P0.05），吸嗅組與奧拉西坦組的評分和對照組比較升高更明顯，且有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異（P0.05） 結(jié)論①常規(guī)的康復(fù)治療結(jié)合迷迭香吸嗅具有改善腦梗死后認(rèn)知障礙患者的認(rèn)知功能及日常生活活動能力的近期療效。②腦梗死患者認(rèn)知功能的改善程度與日常生活活動能力密切相關(guān)，說明改善認(rèn)知功能可提高腦梗死患者的日常生活活動能力，提高康復(fù)治療效果。
[Abstract]:Objective to observe the effect of rosemary sniffing in patients with cognitive impairment after cerebral infarction. Methods Sixty-six patients with cognitive impairment after cerebral infarction were randomly divided into three groups: olfactory sniffing group, oxiracetam group and control group, with 22 cases in each group. All the three groups were given routine treatment, including control of complications, prevention of complications, rehabilitation training, physical factor therapy and drug therapy for promoting blood circulation. On this basis, rosemary extract was given in the sniffing group, 0.4 mL, diluted with 20ml pure water at room temperature, placed in the sealed plastic box of 50cm 脳 40cm 脳 30cm, heated by light bulb, and opened at one end of nose tube in plastic box. Place the other end in the nostrils for 30 mins, three times a day. In the oxiracetam group, 4 g of oxiracetam was given intravenously in 250ml saline or 5% glucose solution, once a day. The control group was given routine treatment, without special treatment. All the three groups were treated for 4 ws. MMSE (Mini-mental State Examination) and MBI (ModifiedBarthel Index) were used to evaluate and evaluate the curative effect of the three groups before and after intervention for 2 weeks and 4 weeks, and the data were recorded. The data were analyzed by SPSS17.0 software. Results 1the MMSE score of the sniffing group was 13.18 鹵3.83 (before intervention), 16.72 鹵2.93 (intervention 2W), 18.50 鹵3.11 (), MBI score 4w) before and after intervention, respectively (41.04 鹵6.33 before intervention). 54.54 鹵6.70 (2 weeks), 68.22 鹵5.98 (4 weeks). The MMSE scores before and after intervention were 11.90 鹵4.15 (pre-intervention), 17.13 鹵4.34 (2 weeks) and 19.45 鹵3.71 (39.18 鹵4.96 before and after 4 weeks of intervention) in olaxetam group, respectively. 53.50 鹵6.02 (2 weeks), 66.45 鹵5.30 (4 weeks). The MMSE scores of the control group were 12.54 鹵3.20 (before intervention), 13.31 鹵3.42 (intervention 2 weeks), 14.72 鹵3.46 (before and after 4 weeks intervention), 39.31 鹵5.25 (before intervention) and 48.31 鹵4.33 (intervention 2 weeks), respectively. 59.04 鹵3.65 (4w). 2 the MMSE scores of the olfactory suction group and olaxetam group were higher than those before and after intervention (P0.05), but the MMSE scores of the control group were not statistically significant (P0.05). The scores of 2 weeks and 4 weeks of intervention in the two groups were significantly different from those in the control group (P0.05), and there was no significant difference in MMSE score between the olfactory suction group and olaxetam group (P0.05). However, the total effective rate of oloxetam group (86.36%) was higher than that of sniffing group (72.27%). The MBI score of 33 group was significantly higher than that of pre-intervention group (P0.05), and the score of olfactory suction group and oloxetam group was higher than that of control group. And there was significant difference (P0.05) conclusion: 1 routine rehabilitation therapy combined with rosemary sniffing can improve cognitive function and daily living ability of patients with cognitive impairment after cerebral infarction. 2 recent curative effect of cerebral infarction. The improvement of patients' cognitive function is closely related to their activities of daily life. It shows that improving cognitive function can improve the activity of daily life of patients with cerebral infarction and improve the effect of rehabilitation treatment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：R749.13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林慧光;丁春;;芳香療法的作用機(jī)理[J];福建中醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年01期

2 李鍵;高曉平;李光武;陳和木;竇云龍;;迷迭香精油吸嗅對PSD大鼠的神經(jīng)行為學(xué)影響[J];安徽醫(yī)藥;2012年12期

3 賈帆;黃微;張玲;陳晶菁;邢冬梅;李佩云;張利林;;小腦頂核電刺激治療在腦梗死早期康復(fù)中的療效觀察[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2008年10期

4 鄭書芳;;奧拉西坦治療腦梗死恢復(fù)期患者認(rèn)知功能障礙的療效觀察[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2012年09期

5 周紅杰,王景周;血管性癡呆的危險因素及神經(jīng)病理學(xué)研究[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué)(腦血管疾病分冊);1999年06期

6 歐陽曉春;余小驪;景少巍;王水華;張翠萍;;鹽酸美金剛治療血管性癡呆的療效觀察[J];臨床軍醫(yī)雜志;2012年06期

7 王毓雯;張穎;喬蕾;;高壓氧+綜合康復(fù)訓(xùn)練治療腦卒中認(rèn)知功能障礙療效觀察[J];山東醫(yī)藥;2007年34期

8 劉艷玲;李奴英;;乙酰膽堿酯酶抑制劑治療老年癡呆癥的研究進(jìn)展[J];山西醫(yī)藥雜志(下半月刊);2008年01期

9 隆昱洲;雷進(jìn);羅麗華;尚正良;劉姚;;小腦頂核電刺激對腦梗死患者認(rèn)知功能的影響[J];實用醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2013年03期

10 朱潔;電針治療對腦卒中后抑郁癥狀和認(rèn)知功能的影響[J];中國臨床康復(fù);2005年32期

本文編號：2407645