斯奈思-漢密爾頓快感量表中文版測評抑郁癥患者的效度和信度
發(fā)布時間:2018-07-21 14:19
【摘要】:目的:評估斯奈思-漢密爾頓快感量表(SHAPS)中文版在抑郁癥患者中的效度和信度。方法:選取166名抑郁癥患者,完成SHAPS、貝克抑郁問卷(BDI-I)和漢密爾頓抑郁量表(HAMD-17)測試,通過效標(biāo)效度和探索性因子分析評價其效度,通過內(nèi)部一致性和Pearson相關(guān)分析評價其信度。結(jié)果:SHAPS與HAMD-17、BDI-I總分間組內(nèi)相關(guān)系數(shù)(ICC)分別為0.90、0.91(均P0.001)。探索性因子分析顯示SHAPS可提取2個公因子,累積方差貢獻(xiàn)率為62.8%。SHAPS的Cronhachα系數(shù)為0.94,1周后重測Pearson相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.91(P0.001),各條目間的相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.30~0.93之間,各條目與SHAPS總分的相關(guān)系數(shù)在0.61~0.79之間。結(jié)論:斯奈思-漢密爾頓快感量表(SHAPS)中文版具有良好的效度和信度,可在抑郁癥患者快感缺失的相關(guān)研究中使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the validity and reliability of Snyth-Hamilton pleasure scale (SHAPS) in patients with depression. Methods: 166 patients with depression were tested with SHAPS, BDI-I and Hamilton Depression scale (HAMD-17). The validity was evaluated by standard validity and exploratory factor analysis, and the reliability was evaluated by internal consistency and Pearson correlation analysis. Results the intergroup correlation coefficients (ICC) between the two groups were 0.90 and 0.91 (both P0.001). Exploratory factor analysis showed that SHAPS could extract two common factors, and the Cronhach 偽 coefficient of cumulative variance contribution rate was 0.94 (P0.001), Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.91 (P0.001), correlation coefficient between items and total score of SHAPS was between 0.30 and 0.93, and the correlation coefficient between items and total score of SHAPS was between 0.61and 0.79. Conclusion: the Chinese version of Snyth-Hamilton pleasure scale (SHAPS) has good validity and reliability.
【作者單位】: 浙江大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院附屬邵逸夫醫(yī)院精神衛(wèi)生科;浙江省湖州市第三人民醫(yī)院;
【基金】:浙江省醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生平臺計劃重點資助項目(2015ZDA016) 湖州市科技計劃項目(2015GYB21)
【分類號】:R749.7
本文編號:2135803
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the validity and reliability of Snyth-Hamilton pleasure scale (SHAPS) in patients with depression. Methods: 166 patients with depression were tested with SHAPS, BDI-I and Hamilton Depression scale (HAMD-17). The validity was evaluated by standard validity and exploratory factor analysis, and the reliability was evaluated by internal consistency and Pearson correlation analysis. Results the intergroup correlation coefficients (ICC) between the two groups were 0.90 and 0.91 (both P0.001). Exploratory factor analysis showed that SHAPS could extract two common factors, and the Cronhach 偽 coefficient of cumulative variance contribution rate was 0.94 (P0.001), Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.91 (P0.001), correlation coefficient between items and total score of SHAPS was between 0.30 and 0.93, and the correlation coefficient between items and total score of SHAPS was between 0.61and 0.79. Conclusion: the Chinese version of Snyth-Hamilton pleasure scale (SHAPS) has good validity and reliability.
【作者單位】: 浙江大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院附屬邵逸夫醫(yī)院精神衛(wèi)生科;浙江省湖州市第三人民醫(yī)院;
【基金】:浙江省醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生平臺計劃重點資助項目(2015ZDA016) 湖州市科技計劃項目(2015GYB21)
【分類號】:R749.7
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 湯臻,李鳴;十八維度人格測定量表的信度和效度[J];上海精神醫(yī)學(xué);1998年03期
2 黃璞;郭毅;;常用各焦慮、抑郁量表的模型、因子、效度等綜述[J];藥物與人;2014年04期
3 王歷;陸凱;王長鷹;勝利;胡大一;丁榮晶;;GAD-2和GAD-7在心血管門診焦慮篩查中的信度與效度分析[J];四川精神衛(wèi)生;2014年03期
4 史雷川;李公正;;視覺—運(yùn)動整合發(fā)育測驗及其應(yīng)用[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué).婦幼保健分冊;1993年03期
5 曹P;王建平;王馨蕊;高揚(yáng);;強(qiáng)迫量表兒童版在中國青少年中應(yīng)用的信效度[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2013年04期
6 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 劉琰;閾下抑郁量表的初步編制[D];北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2015年
,本文編號:2135803
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/jsb/2135803.html
最近更新
教材專著