本文選題：能量平衡療法 + 推拿　； 參考：《湖南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：觀察能量平衡療法調(diào)治軀體疼痛性亞健康的臨床療效,為臨床調(diào)治軀體疼痛性亞健康提供一種新的思路和方法。 方法：將90例亞健康人隨機(jī)分為治療組與常規(guī)推拿組(常規(guī)推拿組)和中頻治療組(中頻理療組),每組30例。能量平衡組和對(duì)照組每次調(diào)治時(shí)間均為45分鐘,調(diào)治一次間隔兩天,一個(gè)療程為五天,共15天。 結(jié)果： 1.在疼痛視覺(jué)模擬評(píng)分比較中：①三組治療前視覺(jué)疼痛模擬評(píng)分無(wú)顯著性差異(P0.05)。②各組治療前后視覺(jué)疼痛模擬評(píng)分差異極顯著(P0.01),提示治療后軀體疼痛性亞健康人群的疼痛強(qiáng)度均明顯降低。③能量平衡療法組與常規(guī)推拿組、中頻治療組相比,治療后的視覺(jué)疼痛模擬評(píng)分具有顯著性差異(P0.01),提示能量平衡療法組手法在改善軀體疼痛性業(yè)健康人群的疼痛癥狀上優(yōu)于常規(guī)推拿組與單純的中頻理療。 2.在SF-36(軀體部分)前后分值比較中：①三組治療前SF-36(軀體部分)評(píng)分無(wú)顯著性差異(P0.05)。②各組治療前后SF-36(軀體部分)評(píng)分差異極顯著(P0.01),提示治療后軀體疼痛性亞健康人群的健康狀況均明顯好轉(zhuǎn)。③能量平衡療法組與常規(guī)推拿組、中頻治療組相比,治療后的SF-36(軀體部分)評(píng)分具有顯著性差異(P0.01),提示能量平衡療法組手法在改善軀體疼痛性亞健康人群的健康狀況上優(yōu)于常規(guī)推拿組與單純的中頻理療。 3.在有效率方面,與中頻治療組比較,其余兩組顯著增高,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.01)；與常規(guī)推拿組比較,能量平衡組有效率明顯升高,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。 結(jié)論： 1.能量平衡療法能夠有效的改善軀體疼痛性亞健康的癥狀。 2.在緩解疼痛癥狀方面,能量平衡療法優(yōu)于常規(guī)推拿和中頻治療。 3.在改善健康狀況方面,能量平衡療法要優(yōu)于常規(guī)推拿和中頻治療。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the clinical efficacy of energy balance therapy in the treatment of subhealth of somatic pain, and to provide a new idea and method for the treatment of subhealth of somatic pain. Methods: 90 cases of subhealthy people were randomly divided into treatment group, routine massage group and medium frequency treatment group, 30 cases in each group. In the energy balance group and the control group, the adjusting time was 45 minutes, the interval was two days, the course of treatment was five days, a total of 15 days. Results: 1. In the comparison of visual analogue scores of pain, there was no significant difference in visual pain simulation scores before and after treatment among the three groups (P0.052.The difference of visual pain analogue scores before and after treatment was extremely significant (P0.01), indicating that the subhealthy population with somatic pain after treatment had no significant difference. The pain intensity was significantly decreased in the energy balance therapy group and the conventional massage group. Compared with the intermediate frequency treatment group, There was significant difference in visual pain simulation scores after treatment (P 0.01), which suggested that the manipulation of energy balance therapy group was superior to the conventional massage group and the simple medium frequency physiotherapy group in improving the pain symptoms of the healthy population with somatic pain. 2. There was no significant difference in the score of SF-36 (body part) between the three groups before and after treatment. There was no significant difference in the score of SF-36 (body part) before and after treatment. The scores of SF-36 (body part) in each group were significantly different before and after treatment, indicating that the body pain was subhealthy after treatment. The health status of the population was obviously improved. 3. The energy balance therapy group and the routine massage group. Compared with the intermediate frequency treatment group, The scores of SF-36 (body part) after treatment were significantly different (P 0.01), suggesting that the treatment group was superior to the conventional massage group and the simple medium frequency physiotherapy group in improving the health status of the subhealthy population with somatic pain. 3. In the effective rate, the other two groups were significantly higher than those in the medium frequency treatment group, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.01), and that in the energy balance group was significantly higher than that in the conventional massage group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion: 1. Energy balance therapy can effectively improve physical pain subhealth symptoms. 2. In the relief of pain symptoms, energy balance therapy is superior to conventional massage and if treatment. 3. In improving health, energy balance therapy is superior to conventional massage and intermediate frequency therapy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：R749.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王艷君,胡朝陽(yáng);從亞健康看中醫(yī)診療現(xiàn)代化發(fā)展趨向[J];安徽中醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

2 趙劍峰;淺談按摩調(diào)治第三狀態(tài)[J];按摩與導(dǎo)引;2002年06期

3 彭世賢;整脊治療亞健康狀態(tài)65例[J];按摩與導(dǎo)引;2004年02期

4 羅仁瀚,源援基,譚金慶;按摩治療亞健康狀態(tài)下的失眠癥療效觀察[J];按摩與導(dǎo)引;2005年02期

5 祝剛,蔡敏;亞健康與整體經(jīng)絡(luò)按摩[J];按摩與導(dǎo)引;2005年04期

6 王毅;按摩手法在亞健康中的應(yīng)用[J];按摩與導(dǎo)引;2005年05期

7 彭飛;;亞健康與脊柱的關(guān)系[J];按摩與導(dǎo)引;2006年10期

8 徐秋娥;;全身推拿治療亞健康的療效觀察[J];浙江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

9 林海;杜儀;白杰;陳海明;周影;戚桂花;藏愛(ài)華;李麗;;足穴治療對(duì)亞健康人群中醫(yī)證候及證型的影響[J];北京中醫(yī)藥;2010年04期

10 王利敏,陳家旭;論體質(zhì)分型與亞健康狀態(tài)[J];中國(guó)醫(yī)藥學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2045957