發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-12 09:28

  本文選題：抑郁 + 影響因素�。� 參考：《衛(wèi)生研究》2014年03期

【摘要】：目的了解大學(xué)生的抑郁狀況并探討其影響因素。方法采用抑郁自評(píng)量表(CES-D)、青少年自評(píng)生活事件量表(ASLEC)、特質(zhì)應(yīng)對(duì)方式問卷(TCSQ)進(jìn)行調(diào)查,以湖南科技學(xué)院在校全日制本科生為調(diào)查對(duì)象,以班級(jí)為單位,采用年級(jí)分層整群抽取,對(duì)一般情況、抑郁癥狀、生活事件、應(yīng)對(duì)方式等進(jìn)行調(diào)查。結(jié)果被試大學(xué)生肯定有抑郁癥狀的為25.00%;不同性別、不同年級(jí)學(xué)生的抑郁均分比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。專業(yè)滿意度不同的學(xué)生抑郁均分比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.001);有抑郁癥狀大學(xué)生的生活事件應(yīng)激強(qiáng)度明顯高于無抑郁癥狀者(P0.001),二者間應(yīng)對(duì)方式均分比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.001)。有抑郁癥狀大學(xué)生的積極應(yīng)對(duì)較少而消極應(yīng)對(duì)傾向大。性別、專業(yè)、成長(zhǎng)環(huán)境及年級(jí)對(duì)大學(xué)生抑郁癥狀檢出率的影響組間比較無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;對(duì)專業(yè)滿意較不滿意者、就業(yè)前景不好較前景好者、非學(xué)生干部較干部者、健康狀況差較健康狀況好者、體育鍛煉1次/周較3次者、家庭經(jīng)濟(jì)不好較條件好者、父母期望高較期望低者、戀愛較未戀愛者的抑郁狀況檢出率要高,各組間比較有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=10.129,P=0.006;χ2=47.128,P0.001;χ2=5.873,P=0.015;χ2=35.343,P0.001;χ2=16.678,P0.001;χ2=15.805,P0.001;χ2=22.408,P0.001;χ2=7.044,P=0.008)。多因素分析結(jié)果顯示:體育鍛煉1次/周、家庭經(jīng)濟(jì)不好、健康狀況差、就業(yè)前景不好、戀愛、父母期望值高的學(xué)生更易發(fā)生抑郁。結(jié)論體育鍛煉、家庭經(jīng)濟(jì)、健康狀況、就業(yè)前景、是否戀愛、父母期望是大學(xué)生抑郁的重要影響因素。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the depression status of college students and its influencing factors. Methods Self-rating Depression scale (CES-DX), Self-Rating Life events scale (ASLECG) and trait coping style questionnaire (TCSQ) were used to investigate the students of Hunan University of Science and Technology. Investigate general conditions, depressive symptoms, life events, coping styles, etc. Results there was no significant difference in the mean score of depression between different genders and different grades (P 0.05). There were significant differences in the mean scores of depression among students with different degree of professional satisfaction (P 0.001), and the stress intensity of life events in students with depression symptoms was significantly higher than that in students without depression symptoms (P 0.001), and there was a significant difference in the mean scores of coping styles between the two groups (P 0.001). College students with depressive symptoms have less positive coping and greater negative coping tendency. The influence of gender, major, growth environment and grade on the prevalence rate of depression symptoms of college students was not statistically significant; those who were not satisfied with their major, those with poor employment prospects, those with higher employment prospects, those with non-student cadres than with cadres, and those with less satisfaction with their major, and those with better employment prospects, had no statistical significance. The poor health condition was better than the healthy condition, the physical exercise once a week was better than the 3 times, the family economy was not good, the parents' expectation was higher than the low expectation, and the rate of depression in love was higher than that in the unloved one. There were statistically significant differences among the groups (蠂 ~ 2 ~ (2) = 10.129) P ~ (0.006); 蠂 ~ (2 +) 47.128 (P 0.001); 蠂 ~ (2) ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ (5.873) P ~ (0.015); 蠂 ~ (2) ~ 2 ~ (2) ~ (5) -843 (P ~ (0.001); 蠂 ~ (2) ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ (2) ~ (16) 778 (P ~ (0.001); 蠂 ~ (2) ~ 2 ~ (2) (15.805) (P ~ (0.001); 蠂 ~ (22) 22. 408 (P ~ 0.001); The results of multivariate analysis showed that students with poor family economy, poor health, poor employment prospects, love and high parental expectations were more likely to suffer from depression. Conclusion physical exercise, family economy, health status, employment prospect, love or not, parents' expectation are important influencing factors of college students' depression.
【作者單位】： 湖南科技學(xué)院數(shù)學(xué)與計(jì)算科學(xué)系;
【分類號(hào)】：R749.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 唐聞捷;張瑋;;體育鍛煉干預(yù)大學(xué)生抑郁情緒的功能探析[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年11期

2 楊小勁,潘矜矜;我校大學(xué)生家庭經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況及消費(fèi)狀況調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];桂林航天工業(yè)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

3 吳敏;時(shí)松和;楊翠萍;;父母文化程度、職業(yè)、期望值及教育方式等因素對(duì)大學(xué)生心理健康水平的影響[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2007年06期

4 趙富才;劉敏;;職業(yè)院校學(xué)生抑郁癥狀及影響因素分析[J];中國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生;2007年10期

5 侯志瑾;陳淑芳;周司麗;李栩;;父母對(duì)大學(xué)生生涯發(fā)展期望量表的編制[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2012年05期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝激揚(yáng);;通絡(luò)消郁湯治療老年抑郁癥62例臨床觀察[J];中醫(yī)藥臨床雜志;2007年06期

2 張健平;;神泰片與奧沙西泮聯(lián)合治療酒精所致焦慮綜合征療效觀察[J];中醫(yī)藥臨床雜志;2009年01期

3 張秀梅;;化郁湯治療卒中后抑郁癥臨床觀察[J];中醫(yī)藥臨床雜志;2010年03期

4 萬(wàn)磊;劉健;盛長(zhǎng)健;謝秀麗;;類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎患者肺功能變化及新風(fēng)膠囊對(duì)其的影響[J];中醫(yī)藥臨床雜志;2010年09期

5 靳瑜;;自擬調(diào)神達(dá)郁湯治療腦卒中后抑郁癥78例臨床研究[J];中醫(yī)藥臨床雜志;2011年12期

6 王芳;;高師生學(xué)業(yè)成績(jī)與家庭因素的相關(guān)性調(diào)查分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

7 李文飛,黃幫良,萬(wàn)興松,費(fèi)龍才;“非典”時(shí)期鐵道工程一線管理人員心理狀況調(diào)查[J];安徽衛(wèi)生職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

8 錢麗,王守娥,王敏;術(shù)前護(hù)理干預(yù)對(duì)外科手術(shù)患者焦慮心理的影響[J];安徽衛(wèi)生職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

9 朱紅梅;牛飛;;心理因素對(duì)分娩的影響[J];安徽衛(wèi)生職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

10 金雨來;;腦卒中并發(fā)抑郁患者62例臨床分析[J];安徽衛(wèi)生職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 楊華;;肝癌患者焦慮調(diào)查分析[A];江西省中醫(yī)藥學(xué)會(huì)2011年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

2 呂美容;;中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療抑郁癥19例的療效分析[A];中國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會(huì)精神疾病專業(yè)委員會(huì)第十一屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2012年

3 吳越;于海燕;湯莉;季萍;;安非他酮治療2型糖尿病合并抑郁癥的療效觀察[A];中國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會(huì)精神疾病專業(yè)委員會(huì)第十一屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2012年

4 周夢(mèng)煜;;舒肝補(bǔ)腎湯合并舍曲林治療老年期抑郁癥40例臨床研究[A];中國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會(huì)精神疾病專業(yè)委員會(huì)第十一屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2012年

5 崔界峰;鄒義壯;王健;陳楠;范宏振;姚晶;段京輝;;加州大學(xué)圣地亞哥分�；谌蝿�(wù)的生活能力測(cè)驗(yàn)簡(jiǎn)版的臨床信效度[A];中國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會(huì)精神疾病專業(yè)委員會(huì)第十一屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2012年

6 王妙妙;周玉英;丁皎;陳潔;;開放式管理及康復(fù)訓(xùn)練對(duì)慢性精神分裂癥患者康復(fù)的效果分析[A];中國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會(huì)精神疾病專業(yè)委員會(huì)第十一屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2012年

7 楊雀屏;王百靈;張恒;包pせ，

本文編號(hào)：2009204