出血性休克失血未控制早期限制性液體復(fù)蘇效果及機(jī)制研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-11-20 08:00
【摘要】:目的: 研究早期進(jìn)行限制性液體復(fù)蘇對(duì)出血未控制的創(chuàng)傷性休克的治療效果及機(jī)制。 方法: 本實(shí)驗(yàn)采用控制性頸動(dòng)脈放血法建立出血未控制性休克兔模型,具體方法如下: (1)新西蘭雄性兔42只,隨機(jī)分為3組。每組14只:無(wú)液體復(fù)蘇組(對(duì)照組)、小劑量液體復(fù)蘇組、大劑量液體復(fù)蘇組。 (2)動(dòng)態(tài)觀察休克前后及補(bǔ)液治療后1h,2h,3h,4h兔的MAP及各項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)室指標(biāo)。 (3)統(tǒng)計(jì)各組休克后4h病死率情況,統(tǒng)計(jì)分析比較各時(shí)間段MAP及各項(xiàng)實(shí)驗(yàn)室指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)。 (4)HE染色后在電子顯微鏡下觀察并比較心、肺、肝、腎組織的病理變化。 結(jié)果: (1)無(wú)液體復(fù)蘇組、小劑量液體復(fù)蘇組、大劑量液體復(fù)蘇組4h病死率分別為71%、7%、36%,小劑量組顯著低于無(wú)補(bǔ)液組(P=0.001),大劑量組與無(wú)補(bǔ)液組相比差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,表明限制性液體復(fù)蘇可以降低病死率。 (2)小劑量液體復(fù)蘇組較大劑量組、無(wú)液體復(fù)蘇組相比,血液中的RBC下降明顯減少,有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),而大劑量組RBC值與無(wú)液體復(fù)蘇組無(wú)差異(P0.05)。表明限制性液體復(fù)蘇可以避免血液過(guò)度稀釋,增加組織氧供。 (3)比較各時(shí)間點(diǎn)乳酸、血鉀濃度,小劑量組較大劑量組、無(wú)液體復(fù)蘇組均有顯著下降(P0.05),表明限制性液體復(fù)蘇能減輕酸中毒,維持組織內(nèi)環(huán)境穩(wěn)定。 (4)各組CK-MB、肌酐濃度,小劑量組較大劑量組、無(wú)液體復(fù)蘇組均有顯著下降(P0.05),表明限制性液體復(fù)蘇可以維持各器官功能的穩(wěn)定。 (5)病理結(jié)果顯示:各實(shí)驗(yàn)組存活動(dòng)物心、肺、肝、腎都有一定程度病理?yè)p傷,但是小劑量液體復(fù)蘇組損傷程度較未補(bǔ)液組、大劑量液體復(fù)蘇組較輕。表明限制性液體復(fù)蘇可以防止器官受到進(jìn)一步的病理?yè)p傷。 結(jié)論: (1)對(duì)于非控制性出血性休克,在確定性手術(shù)止血之前進(jìn)行低壓復(fù)蘇(MAP50-60mmHg)較之大劑量液體復(fù)蘇(MAP70-80mmHg)能顯著延長(zhǎng)休克動(dòng)物的存活時(shí)間,降低早期病死率; (2)限制性液體復(fù)蘇可以在一定程度上防止血液過(guò)度稀釋,從而增加血液的攜氧能力;減輕酸中毒,維持各器官功能,機(jī)體內(nèi)環(huán)境及細(xì)胞代謝的穩(wěn)定;減輕休克液體復(fù)蘇對(duì)心、肺、肝、腎的病理?yè)p傷,更有利于預(yù)后。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the therapeutic effect and mechanism of early restrictive fluid resuscitation on traumatic shock with uncontrolled hemorrhage. Methods: the rabbit model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock was established by controlled carotid artery bleeding. The methods were as follows: (1) 42 New Zealand male rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups. There were 14 rats in each group: no fluid resuscitation group (control group), low dose fluid resuscitation group and high dose fluid resuscitation group. (2) the MAP and laboratory indexes of rabbits before and after shock were observed dynamically. (3) the death rate of 4 hours after shock was analyzed and compared with MAP and laboratory data. (4) the pathological changes of heart, lung, liver and kidney were observed and compared under electron microscope after HE staining. Results: (1) the fatality rate of fluid free resuscitation group, low dose fluid resuscitation group and high dose liquid resuscitation group was 71and 7360.The mortality of the low-dose group was significantly lower than that of the non-resuscitation group (P0. 001). There was no significant difference between the high dose group and the non-rehydration group, indicating that restricted fluid resuscitation could reduce the mortality. (2) the decrease of RBC in blood was significantly decreased in the small dose fluid resuscitation group and the non-liquid resuscitation group (P0.05), but the RBC value in the high-dose group was not different from that in the non-liquid resuscitation group (P0.05). Restrictive fluid resuscitation can avoid excessive hemodilution and increase tissue oxygen supply. (3) compared the concentration of lactic acid and potassium in blood at different time points, the concentration of lactic acid and potassium in small dose group and non-liquid resuscitation group were significantly decreased (P0.05), which indicated that restrictive fluid resuscitation could alleviate acidosis and maintain the stability of tissue environment. (4) CK-MB, creatinine concentration in each group, small dose group, large dose group, no fluid resuscitation group were significantly decreased (P0.05), indicating that restrictive fluid resuscitation can maintain the stability of organ function. (5) the pathological results showed that the heart, lung, liver and kidney of all experimental groups were damaged to some extent, but the injury degree of the small dose fluid resuscitation group was lower than that of the non-resuscitation group, and the high dose liquid resuscitation group was lighter. This suggests that restricted fluid resuscitation can prevent further pathological damage to organs. Conclusion: (1) for uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, hypobaric resuscitation (MAP50-60mmHg) before definitive operation can significantly prolong the survival time of shock animals compared with high-dose fluid resuscitation (MAP70-80mmHg). Reducing early mortality; (2) restrictive fluid resuscitation can prevent excessive hemodilution to a certain extent, increase the oxygen carrying capacity of blood, reduce acidosis, maintain the function of various organs, and stabilize the environment and cell metabolism of the body. Reducing the pathological injury of heart, lung, liver and kidney caused by shock fluid resuscitation is more favorable for prognosis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:R459.7
本文編號(hào):2344327
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the therapeutic effect and mechanism of early restrictive fluid resuscitation on traumatic shock with uncontrolled hemorrhage. Methods: the rabbit model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock was established by controlled carotid artery bleeding. The methods were as follows: (1) 42 New Zealand male rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups. There were 14 rats in each group: no fluid resuscitation group (control group), low dose fluid resuscitation group and high dose fluid resuscitation group. (2) the MAP and laboratory indexes of rabbits before and after shock were observed dynamically. (3) the death rate of 4 hours after shock was analyzed and compared with MAP and laboratory data. (4) the pathological changes of heart, lung, liver and kidney were observed and compared under electron microscope after HE staining. Results: (1) the fatality rate of fluid free resuscitation group, low dose fluid resuscitation group and high dose liquid resuscitation group was 71and 7360.The mortality of the low-dose group was significantly lower than that of the non-resuscitation group (P0. 001). There was no significant difference between the high dose group and the non-rehydration group, indicating that restricted fluid resuscitation could reduce the mortality. (2) the decrease of RBC in blood was significantly decreased in the small dose fluid resuscitation group and the non-liquid resuscitation group (P0.05), but the RBC value in the high-dose group was not different from that in the non-liquid resuscitation group (P0.05). Restrictive fluid resuscitation can avoid excessive hemodilution and increase tissue oxygen supply. (3) compared the concentration of lactic acid and potassium in blood at different time points, the concentration of lactic acid and potassium in small dose group and non-liquid resuscitation group were significantly decreased (P0.05), which indicated that restrictive fluid resuscitation could alleviate acidosis and maintain the stability of tissue environment. (4) CK-MB, creatinine concentration in each group, small dose group, large dose group, no fluid resuscitation group were significantly decreased (P0.05), indicating that restrictive fluid resuscitation can maintain the stability of organ function. (5) the pathological results showed that the heart, lung, liver and kidney of all experimental groups were damaged to some extent, but the injury degree of the small dose fluid resuscitation group was lower than that of the non-resuscitation group, and the high dose liquid resuscitation group was lighter. This suggests that restricted fluid resuscitation can prevent further pathological damage to organs. Conclusion: (1) for uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, hypobaric resuscitation (MAP50-60mmHg) before definitive operation can significantly prolong the survival time of shock animals compared with high-dose fluid resuscitation (MAP70-80mmHg). Reducing early mortality; (2) restrictive fluid resuscitation can prevent excessive hemodilution to a certain extent, increase the oxygen carrying capacity of blood, reduce acidosis, maintain the function of various organs, and stabilize the environment and cell metabolism of the body. Reducing the pathological injury of heart, lung, liver and kidney caused by shock fluid resuscitation is more favorable for prognosis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:R459.7
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 張吉新;李士華;畢寶林;崔兆偉;張穎;;創(chuàng)傷失血性休克的液體復(fù)蘇[J];創(chuàng)傷外科雜志;2008年03期
2 黃善灶;;限制性液體復(fù)蘇治療嚴(yán)重多發(fā)傷失血性休克臨床分析[J];中國(guó)急救復(fù)蘇與災(zāi)害醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2008年06期
,本文編號(hào):2344327
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/jjyx/2344327.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著