紅細(xì)胞比容和白蛋白差值鑒別急性失血性休克與感染性休克的臨床觀察
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the feasibility of differentiating acute hemorrhagic shock from septic shock by using the difference of specific volume of erythrocyte (Hct) and albumin (Alb). Methods: the cases were divided into three parts. The first part (group A) was a healthy control group. The healthy control group was from Kunming Medical University physical examination Center. There were 385 healthy persons from October 2011 to March 2012, including 185 males and 200 females. The RBC specific volume and albumin were measured and the difference was calculated. The second part (group B) was from November 2011 to February 2013 in 46 patients with acute hemorrhagic shock, including 23 males and 23 females aged 18-86 years. RBC specific volume (Hct) and albumin (Alb) were measured within 1 hour after admission and the difference was calculated. The third part (group C) was a total of 74 patients (48 males and 26 females aged 26-93 years) diagnosed as septic shock in our department from December 2011 to November 2012. RBC specific volume (Hct) and albumin (Alb) were measured after septic shock. The difference is calculated. The specific volume of erythrocyte and the difference between protein and specific volume of erythrocyte were drawn to distinguish the action characteristic (Receiver Operator Characteristic ROC) curve between acute hemorrhagic shock and septic shock. The area (AUC) and threshold value under the curve were calculated and the sensitivity and specificity were determined. Results: there was no significant difference in age and sex composition ratio among the three groups (P0.05), the difference of Hct-Alb between group A and group B was not statistically significant (p0.05), the difference of Hct-Alb between group C and group A was higher than that of group A (p0.05). Compared with group B, the difference of Hct-Alb in group C was higher than that in group B (p0.05). The results of (ROC) curve analysis showed that the threshold value of area under curve (AUC) was 0.918 Hct-Alb difference value was 9.15, the sensitivity was 90.5 and the specificity was 87g. Conclusion as one of the clinical differential markers of acute hemorrhagic shock and septic shock, the threshold value of the differential value is 9.15, the sensitivity is 90.5%, and the specificity is 87.1% Hct-Alb can be used as one of the clinical differential markers of acute hemorrhagic shock and septic shock.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:昆明醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:R459.7
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 黎介壽;;首選腸內(nèi)營養(yǎng)的合理性[J];腸外與腸內(nèi)營養(yǎng);2013年06期
2 劉凌琪;楊嗣星;吳天鵬;宋超;廖文彪;鄭府;柯芹;;孤立腎結(jié)石患者電子輸尿管軟鏡鈥激光碎石術(shù)后出現(xiàn)尿膿毒血癥的診治分析[J];臨床泌尿外科雜志;2013年12期
3 覃黎葵;龔正;莊小強(qiáng);張?zhí)m玲;李佑橋;;三氧自血療法聯(lián)合多潘立酮治療功能性消化不良的療效[J];實(shí)用醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2012年07期
4 王華東;曹文杰;張民;付振帥;劉道營;李耀勝;;早期液體復(fù)蘇對感染性休克患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué)的影響[J];現(xiàn)代生物醫(yī)學(xué)進(jìn)展;2013年25期
5 ;Protective effects of medical ozone combined with traditional Chinese medicine against chemically-induced hepatic injury in dogs[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2007年45期
6 董科奇;鄧杰;;磷酸肌酸對嚴(yán)重膿毒癥患者心肌損傷的臨床研究[J];新醫(yī)學(xué);2013年09期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 李宗玉;臭氧水在創(chuàng)面治療中應(yīng)用的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2010年
2 朱瑋;β-葡聚糖增強(qiáng)大鼠乳腺上皮細(xì)胞的自主防御及其機(jī)制研究[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2011年
3 張利軍;熱休克蛋白70抑制劑PFT-μ對誘導(dǎo)型一氧化氮合成酶誘導(dǎo)表達(dá)及蛋白穩(wěn)定性的影響[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué);2013年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條
1 孫文沖;臭氧預(yù)處理可影響氯胺酮對膿毒癥大鼠肝臟核因子kappa-B的作用[D];中國醫(yī)科大學(xué);2010年
2 吳應(yīng)強(qiáng);連續(xù)性血液凈化對多器官功能障礙綜合征患者Th1/Th2的影響[D];遵義醫(yī)學(xué)院;2013年
3 鄒毅;異丙酚對哮喘小鼠氣道保護(hù)作用的炎癥機(jī)制研究[D];北京協(xié)和醫(yī)學(xué)院;2013年
4 劉娟娟;二維斑點(diǎn)追蹤技術(shù)在膿毒血癥心臟早期損傷中的應(yīng)用[D];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2013年
5 何夢龍;成人嚴(yán)重?zé)齻l(fā)膿毒癥危險(xiǎn)因素的非條件Logistic回歸分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2013年
6 邊毓堯;膿毒癥患者早期血漿皮質(zhì)醇變化特點(diǎn)及臨床意義[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2013年
7 李亞南;重組人腫瘤壞死因子受體融合蛋白(rhTNFR:FC)對膿毒癥大鼠心肌損傷的保護(hù)作用[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2013年
8 涂進(jìn);烏魯木齊市嚴(yán)重創(chuàng)傷流行病學(xué)調(diào)查及救治情況[D];新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué);2013年
9 楊婧;重癥監(jiān)護(hù)室內(nèi)中心靜脈導(dǎo)管相關(guān)性血行感染預(yù)后危險(xiǎn)因素分析[D];浙江大學(xué);2013年
,本文編號:2201156
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/jjyx/2201156.html