汶川地震后60個月救災(zāi)志愿者替代性創(chuàng)傷狀況及影響因素研究
本文選題:救災(zāi)志愿者 + 替代性創(chuàng)傷 ; 參考:《中國全科醫(yī)學》2016年24期
【摘要】:目的了解汶川地震后60個月救災(zāi)志愿者替代性創(chuàng)傷狀況,并探討其影響因素。方法采用方便抽樣法,于2013年8—10月,在唐山地區(qū)選取參加過汶川地震的救災(zāi)志愿者200例,均在地震后3個月接受過替代性創(chuàng)傷問卷(VTS)簡易應(yīng)對方式問卷、社會支持評定量表調(diào)查,并與其地震后60個月的數(shù)據(jù)進行比較。相關(guān)性分析采用Pearson相關(guān)分析;影響因素分析采用多元線性回歸分析。結(jié)果地震后60個月4例(2.0%)救災(zāi)志愿者替代性創(chuàng)傷總分超過理論中值。200例救災(zāi)志愿者地震后60個月情緒反應(yīng)、認知反應(yīng)、生理反應(yīng)得分及VTS總分低于地震后3個月,行為反應(yīng)得分高于地震后3個月,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);積極應(yīng)對、消極應(yīng)對、對社會支持利用度得分及社會支持評定量表總分低于地震后3個月,主觀支持、客觀支持得分高于地震后3個月,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。VTS總分與消極應(yīng)對得分呈正相關(guān)(P0.05),而與主觀支持、客觀支持、對社會支持利用度得分及社會支持評定量表總分呈負相關(guān)(P0.05)。消極應(yīng)對是地震后60個月救災(zāi)志愿者替代性創(chuàng)傷的影響因素(Y=108.758-1.080×消極應(yīng)對得分,P0.05)。結(jié)論救災(zāi)志愿者在地震后60個月仍存在著一定程度的替代性創(chuàng)傷,但與地震后3個月相比,替代性創(chuàng)傷程度降低。同時其采用消極應(yīng)對方式次數(shù)越少,產(chǎn)生替代性創(chuàng)傷程度越低。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the status of alternative trauma in disaster relief volunteers 60 months after Wenchuan earthquake and its influencing factors. Methods from August to October 2013, 200 disaster relief volunteers who had participated in Wenchuan earthquake in Tangshan area were selected by convenient sampling method. All of them received VTS (alternative trauma questionnaire) simple coping style questionnaire 3 months after the earthquake. The Social support rating scale was investigated and compared with the data of 60 months after the earthquake. Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used for correlation analysis. Results at 60 months after the earthquake, the total score of alternative trauma in the relief volunteers was higher than that in the theoretical median of .200. The scores of emotional response, cognitive response, physiological response and VTS were lower than those in the third month after the earthquake. The score of behavioral response was higher than that of 3 months after the earthquake, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), the scores of positive coping, negative coping, the score of social support utilization and the total score of social support rating scale were lower than those of 3 months after earthquake, and subjective support. The score of objective support was higher than that of 3 months after the earthquake. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The total score of VTS was positively correlated with the score of negative coping (P 0.05), but negatively correlated with the score of subjective support, objective support, the score of social support availability and the total score of social support rating scale (P 0.05). Negative coping was the influencing factor of alternative trauma in disaster relief volunteers 60 months after the earthquake. The score of negative coping was 0.05% (108.758-1.080 脳 negative coping score). Conclusion there is a certain degree of alternative trauma in disaster relief volunteers 60 months after the earthquake, but the degree of alternative trauma is lower than that of 3 months after the earthquake. At the same time, the less the number of negative coping styles, the lower the degree of alternative trauma.
【作者單位】: 華北理工大學心理學院;
【基金】:唐山市科學技術(shù)研究與發(fā)展計劃課題(08130230C)——災(zāi)難救助者替代性創(chuàng)傷的影響因素研究
【分類號】:R641
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馬君英;;替代性創(chuàng)傷研究述評[J];醫(yī)學與社會;2010年04期
2 程愛國;現(xiàn)代災(zāi)害性創(chuàng)傷的特點及其應(yīng)急對策的研究[J];中國煤炭工業(yè)醫(yī)學雜志;2005年07期
3 賈國平;劉卓拉;戴文娟;高曉玲;;機械性創(chuàng)傷致大鼠血清腎上腺素的動態(tài)變化及其臨床意義[J];中國醫(yī)療前沿;2010年22期
4 狄鳳桐,徐幫宗,張曉云;遲發(fā)性創(chuàng)傷性氣腦2例報告[J];第四軍醫(yī)大學學報;1981年02期
5 采立方,徐應(yīng)杰,楊旭新;應(yīng)用槐花維膚膏治療淺表性創(chuàng)傷10例報告[J];中國藥業(yè);1996年03期
6 魯?shù)律?陳昌榮;邵翔;湯澄;田晶;朱唏群;隋晉平;陽欣科;;三甲醫(yī)院應(yīng)對突發(fā)大規(guī)模群體性創(chuàng)傷的策略和方法:附南京7.28丙烷爆炸案急救報告[J];創(chuàng)傷外科雜志;2011年04期
7 李平;;中性粒細胞和血管內(nèi)皮細胞在外科性創(chuàng)傷中的作用[J];國外醫(yī)學情報;1997年13期
8 狄鳳桐,徐邦宗,張曉云;遲發(fā)性創(chuàng)傷性氣腦2例[J];解放軍醫(yī)學雜志;1982年06期
9 本刊編輯部;;全科醫(yī)生小詞典——替代性創(chuàng)傷[J];中國全科醫(yī)學;2014年13期
10 ;全科醫(yī)生小詞典——替代性創(chuàng)傷[J];中國全科醫(yī)學;2014年14期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 傳說 編譯;忍受慢性創(chuàng)傷[N];醫(yī)藥經(jīng)濟報;2009年
,本文編號:1998661
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/jjyx/1998661.html