磁共振張量成像和磁敏感加權(quán)成像對(duì)創(chuàng)傷性顱腦損傷的診斷價(jià)值—?jiǎng)游飳?shí)驗(yàn)研究及臨床觀察
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-24 22:36
本文選題:彌漫性軸索損傷 + 張量成像 ; 參考:《蚌埠醫(yī)學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】:目的: 建立大白兔彌漫性軸索損傷(diffuse axonal injury,DAI)動(dòng)物模型,將DTI結(jié)果與創(chuàng)傷性腦組織病理切片對(duì)比分析,探討DAI早期磁共振功能影像學(xué)表現(xiàn)。 材料與方法:選取25只成年大白兔進(jìn)行磁共振成像及組織學(xué)檢查,其中20只為實(shí)驗(yàn)組,通過(guò)生物撞擊機(jī)的撞擊錘撞擊大白兔頭部,撞擊的氣壓分別是450KPa/cm2、550KPa/cm2,建立輕度DAI組及重度DAI組致傷模型,重度組損傷后3h行常規(guī)MRI及DTI檢查,輕度DAI組在外傷后3h、1d及1w行常規(guī)MRI、DTI和SWI檢查,磁共振掃描結(jié)束后取胼胝體區(qū)進(jìn)行病理切片、HE染色。其余5只為對(duì)照組,直接行磁共振掃描及病理切片、HE染色。 結(jié)果: 重度DAI組4例顱骨骨折伴蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔出血,2例顱骨骨折、蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔出血、腦挫裂傷伴顱內(nèi)血腫形成,重度DAI組大白兔胼胝體各向異性分?jǐn)?shù)(fractionalantisotropy,F(xiàn)A)較對(duì)照組明顯升高(P=0.006),表觀彌散系數(shù)(apparent diffusioncoefficient,ADC)較對(duì)照組降低(P=0.020),徑向彌散(radical diffusivity,RD)RD較對(duì)照組降低(P=0.001),軸向彌散(axial diffusivity,AD)未見(jiàn)明顯改變(P=0.253);HE染色顯示神經(jīng)元腫脹,,胞漿淡染,有局限性炎細(xì)胞浸潤(rùn),沒(méi)有明顯軸索回縮球形成。輕度DAI組11例無(wú)顱骨骨折、無(wú)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔出血,1例蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔出血伴顱骨骨折,2例顱骨骨折、無(wú)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔出血,輕度DAI組外傷后3h FA、ADC、AD及RD值無(wú)明顯改變(P0.05),外傷后1d FA明顯升高(P=0.004),RD降低(P=0.046),ADC及AD無(wú)明顯變化,外傷后1w,F(xiàn)A、ADC、AD及RD值無(wú)明顯變化(P0.05)。彌散張量纖維束成像(diffusion tensor tractography,DTT)顯示腦白質(zhì)區(qū)纖維束數(shù)量減少,投射的范圍也縮小。HE染色顯示輕度DAI組3個(gè)時(shí)間點(diǎn)都有炎性細(xì)胞浸潤(rùn),都沒(méi)有顯示軸索回縮球形成。輕度DAI組外傷后3h神經(jīng)元無(wú)腫脹,胞漿無(wú)淡然;外傷后1d神經(jīng)元腫脹,胞漿淡染,;外傷后1w神經(jīng)元無(wú)腫脹,胞漿無(wú)淡染;。重度DAI組和輕度DAI組都可見(jiàn)大白兔腦靜脈增粗,稱(chēng)之為“異常血管征”。實(shí)驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn)重度DAI組“異常血管征”的發(fā)生率明顯高于輕度DAI組和對(duì)照組(P=0.03)。 結(jié)論: 通過(guò)直線(xiàn)加速致傷裝置,應(yīng)用450KPa/cm2、550KPa/cm2撞擊氣壓可以成功制成以大白兔為研究對(duì)象的DAI模型。在重度DAI組和輕度DAI組外傷后1d,胼胝體FA值升高、ADC值降低,反映了DAI急性期以細(xì)胞毒性水腫為主,輕度DAI組外傷后1w FA及ADC值恢復(fù)正常,說(shuō)明輕度顱腦損傷導(dǎo)致細(xì)胞毒性水腫可以自行恢復(fù)正常。SWI圖中的“異常血管征”提示腦內(nèi)血氧代謝異常,說(shuō)明腦外傷早期顱腦缺血缺氧是導(dǎo)致細(xì)胞毒性水腫的主要原則之一。該DAI動(dòng)物模型生動(dòng)形象的揭示了創(chuàng)傷性顱腦損傷腦水腫的變化以及軸索的病理變化過(guò)程,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)CT及常規(guī)MRI無(wú)法顯示的病變。因此,DTI及SWI是探索DAI發(fā)生及發(fā)展過(guò)程的一種敏感性成像方法,利用DTI及SWI技術(shù)檢查顱腦外傷患者,可為DAI早期診斷及治療提供影像參考。 目的: 利用磁共振張量成像分析創(chuàng)傷性顱腦損傷后腦白質(zhì)各個(gè)參數(shù)值的變化與認(rèn)知功能障礙有無(wú)相關(guān)性。 材料與方法:創(chuàng)傷性顱腦損傷(traumatic brain injury,TBI)患者17例,健康對(duì)照組17例。實(shí)驗(yàn)組每個(gè)受試者行格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)檢查,大于或等于13分為輕度組,小于或等于12分為中-重度組。每個(gè)受試者行磁共振張量成像檢查,并使用Neuro3D軟件測(cè)量胼胝體膝部、胼胝體壓部、內(nèi)囊后肢、內(nèi)囊前肢及大腦腳的FA及ADC值,比較各組FA及ADC值之間的差異,并對(duì)腦白質(zhì)纖維束進(jìn)行三維重建。每位患者按照《簡(jiǎn)易精神狀態(tài)檢查(MMSE)》標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行檢查評(píng)分,比較分析實(shí)驗(yàn)組FA及ADC值與MMSE評(píng)分有無(wú)相關(guān)性。 結(jié)果: 與對(duì)照組比較,重度組胼胝體膝部及壓部FA值明顯降低,胼胝體膝部及壓部、內(nèi)囊后肢及大腦腳ADC值升高;腦白質(zhì)彌散張量纖維束成像DTT顯示重度組胼胝體纖維束的數(shù)量明顯減少及投射范圍縮小。輕度組各個(gè)興趣區(qū)域的FA及ADC值無(wú)顯著性差異。輕度組MMSE評(píng)分無(wú)顯著性差異(P0.05)。重度組MMSE評(píng)分降低(P0.01)。MMSE評(píng)分與胼胝體膝部及壓部的FA呈正相關(guān),與胼胝體膝部及壓部ADC值呈負(fù)相關(guān),F(xiàn)A降低越明顯和ADC值升高越明顯,MMSE值降低越明顯,說(shuō)明TBI患者認(rèn)知功能障礙越明顯。 結(jié)論: DTI是一種顯示腦白質(zhì)損傷的敏感性成像方法,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)CT及常規(guī)MRI無(wú)法顯示的腦白質(zhì)病變,TBI后胼胝體膝部及壓部FA及ADC值與MMSE評(píng)分呈線(xiàn)性相關(guān),胼胝體膝部及壓部FA及ADC值有助于對(duì)TBI患者認(rèn)知功能進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),F(xiàn)A越低及ADC值越高,其認(rèn)知功能障礙越明顯。反正,認(rèn)知功能障礙越輕。因此,胼胝體DTI成像有助于評(píng)估TBI患者認(rèn)知功能損害程度,為治療及預(yù)后提供客觀依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Objective:
An animal model of diffuse axonal injury (diffuse axonal injury, DAI) in rabbits was established. The results of DTI and the pathological sections of traumatic brain tissue were compared and analyzed to explore the imaging performance of early magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in DAI.
Materials and methods: 25 adult white rabbits were selected for magnetic resonance imaging and histological examination. 20 of them were in the experimental group. The impact of the impact hammer on the head of the rabbit was 450KPa/cm2550KPa/cm2. The injury model of the mild DAI group and the severe DAI group was established. The routine MRI and DTI examination of the severe group after the injury was performed by the routine MRI and DTI examination. In the mild DAI group, the routine MRI, DTI and SWI examinations were performed on 3h, 1D and 1W after trauma. After the MRI scan, the corpus callosum area was taken for pathological section and HE staining. The rest 5 were the control group, and the magnetic resonance scan and pathological section were performed directly, and the HE staining was performed.
Result錛
本文編號(hào):1798574
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/jjyx/1798574.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著