本文選題：預(yù)防艾滋病 + 志愿者�。� 參考：《上海外國語大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前，預(yù)防艾滋病已成為全球性行動，，各種工作隊(duì)伍多方參與，其中，志愿者的獨(dú)特作用日益彰顯。在此過程中，人們逐步認(rèn)識到文化因素對預(yù)防艾滋病的宣傳、倡導(dǎo)、培訓(xùn)、服務(wù)的影響，預(yù)防艾滋病志愿者需要面臨與不同文化和亞文化群體的交際互動，然而，針對預(yù)防艾滋病志愿者跨文化交際能力的研究在國內(nèi)外卻鮮有文獻(xiàn)報道。 本研究以Chen和Starosta的跨文化交際能力模型為基礎(chǔ)，以其“跨文化敏感度量表”及Portalla和Chen的“跨文化交際效力量表”為工具，以上海地區(qū)176位預(yù)防艾滋病志愿者為研究對象，通過問卷調(diào)查和隨機(jī)電話訪談，對志愿者隊(duì)伍的基本結(jié)構(gòu)、參與預(yù)防艾滋病活動的基本狀況，及其跨文化敏感度和效力進(jìn)行了解和分析。 研究結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)：志愿者的跨文化敏感度和效力處于中等水平，跨文化效力低于跨文化敏感度水平�？缥幕舾卸扰c效力呈顯著正相關(guān)。不同性別、年齡、職業(yè)，以及從事志愿服務(wù)時間、接觸服務(wù)人群不同的志愿者，其組別間跨文化敏感度和效力無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異。志愿者參與活動類別的數(shù)量對跨文化敏感度和效力均有明顯影響，其中，志愿者是否有學(xué)習(xí)跨文化交際理論和對服務(wù)人群主持預(yù)防艾滋病培訓(xùn)的經(jīng)歷，其跨文化敏感度有顯著差異，但跨文化效力無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異。面對與來自不同文化或亞文化群體的對象打交道，絕大多數(shù)志愿者表現(xiàn)出良好的意愿，但同時也顯示出擔(dān)憂、懼怕和焦慮等負(fù)面心理。 作者就調(diào)查結(jié)果作了個人解讀，建議今后將跨文化內(nèi)容引入對預(yù)防艾滋病志愿者的招募、培訓(xùn)和測評等管理環(huán)節(jié)；倡導(dǎo)預(yù)防艾滋病機(jī)構(gòu)在關(guān)注志愿者數(shù)量的同時，更加重視培育志愿者的綜合能力以提高志愿服務(wù)成效；呼吁跨文化研究與公共衛(wèi)生領(lǐng)域加強(qiáng)交流合作以促進(jìn)預(yù)防艾滋病成效。作者對本研究局限性做了分析，對深入研究方向提出了建議。
[Abstract]:At present, AIDS prevention has become a global action, with the participation of various teams, in which the unique role of volunteers is increasingly evident. In the process, people gradually realize the impact of cultural factors on AIDS prevention, advocacy, training, services, AIDS prevention volunteers need to face interaction with different cultural and sub-cultural groups, however, The research on cross-cultural communication ability of AIDS prevention volunteers is seldom reported at home and abroad. Based on Chen and Starosta's cross-cultural communicative competence model, the cross-cultural sensitivity scale and Portalla and Chen's Intercultural Communication effectiveness scale were used to study 176 AIDS prevention volunteers in Shanghai. The basic structure of volunteers, the basic status of AIDS prevention activities, and their cross-cultural sensitivity and effectiveness were investigated and analyzed by questionnaires and random telephone interviews. The results showed that the cross-cultural sensitivity and effectiveness of volunteers were at the medium level, and the cross-cultural effectiveness was lower than that of cross-cultural sensitivity. There was a significant positive correlation between cross-cultural sensitivity and effectiveness. There was no significant difference in cross-cultural sensitivity and effectiveness among different gender, age, occupation, volunteer service time, and contact with different service groups. The number of volunteer participation activities has a significant impact on cross-cultural sensitivity and effectiveness. Among them, whether volunteers have the experience of learning the theory of intercultural communication and hosting AIDS prevention training for service groups. There are significant differences in cross-cultural sensitivity, but there is no statistical difference in cross-cultural effect. Most of the volunteers showed good intentions in dealing with objects from different cultural or subcultural groups, but they also showed negative psychology such as worry, fear and anxiety. The author makes a personal interpretation of the findings and suggests that cross-cultural content should be introduced into the recruitment, training and evaluation of AIDS prevention volunteers in the future, and that AIDS prevention organizations should pay attention to the number of volunteers at the same time. More attention should be paid to developing the comprehensive capacity of volunteers to improve the effectiveness of volunteer service. It calls for more communication and cooperation between cross-cultural research and public health to promote the effectiveness of AIDS prevention. The author makes an analysis of the limitations of this study and puts forward some suggestions for further research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D632.9;R512.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 李冬梅;張方良;;中國—東盟博覽會志愿者跨文化敏感能力的測評與培訓(xùn)[J];東南亞縱橫;2011年10期

2 葉敏;安然;;短期來華留學(xué)生跨文化敏感與效力分析研究[J];高教探索;2012年02期

3 陳旭峰;田志鋒;錢民輝;;農(nóng)民工的社會融入何以可能——基于理論的分析和調(diào)研思考[J];理論探索;2010年03期

4 邵思源;陳堅林;;一項(xiàng)對高中英語教師跨文化交際敏感度的調(diào)查[J];外語學(xué)刊;2011年03期

5 王曉玲;;跨文化敏感:民族院校與非民族院校學(xué)生對比研究[J];北方民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年01期

6 裴泓波;李瑩;薛紅麗;王玉;焦丹強(qiáng);薛莉;徐頡哲;蘇峰;殷小娟;賀琴;高云波;戴洪偉;;大學(xué)生志愿者對外出務(wù)工人員艾滋病健康干預(yù)[J];中國公共衛(wèi)生;2006年11期

7 侯欣;周曉春;呂鵬;;大學(xué)生從事艾滋病志愿服務(wù)情況的調(diào)查[J];中國青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年06期

8 曾轉(zhuǎn)萍;醫(yī)藥大學(xué)生開展艾滋病青年志愿者活動設(shè)計初探[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報論叢;2005年04期

本文編號：2105945