泛耐藥鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌包膜蛋白對(duì)致病性的影響
本文選題:不動(dòng)桿菌 + 多重耐藥 ; 參考:《河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文
【摘要】:目的:探討ICU患者下呼吸道檢出不動(dòng)桿菌屬耐藥情況、不同致病狀態(tài)的檢出菌包膜蛋白產(chǎn)生情況及其與致病狀態(tài)的關(guān)系。我們共分離出10株定植菌株,32株感染菌株。通過(guò)分析其感染高危因素,探討定植菌與感染菌宿主在臨床方面差異。根據(jù)CPIS評(píng)分和定量培養(yǎng)的結(jié)果來(lái)判定細(xì)菌的定植與感染狀態(tài)。CPIS評(píng)分包括:體溫,外周血白細(xì)胞分類(lèi)及計(jì)數(shù),,氣道膿性分泌物的量,氧合指數(shù),胸部影像檢查結(jié)果和呼吸道抽吸物革蘭染色鏡檢及培養(yǎng)結(jié)果。當(dāng)CPIS評(píng)分大于6分,同時(shí)定量培養(yǎng)結(jié)果大于菌落計(jì)數(shù)106CFU/ml診斷為呼吸機(jī)相關(guān)性肺炎,即患者為感染狀態(tài)。并研究耐藥的鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌在定植及感染狀態(tài)下外膜毒力蛋白(OmpA/BauA)的表達(dá)與其致病性的關(guān)系。 方法: 1菌株來(lái)源:收集2011-2012年來(lái)自河北省4家醫(yī)院的42株鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌菌株。 2藥敏試驗(yàn):采用K-B法鑒定分離的鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌對(duì)頭孢哌酮/舒巴坦、頭孢哌酮、頭孢噻肟、哌拉西林、頭孢他啶、頭孢吡肟、比阿培南、美羅培南、阿米卡星、環(huán)丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、慶大霉素、氯霉素、氨曲南、米諾環(huán)素、復(fù)方新諾明16種抗菌素的敏感性。并根據(jù)美國(guó)臨床實(shí)驗(yàn)室標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化委員會(huì)(NCCLS)2008年版要求進(jìn)行抗菌藥物敏感性判斷。 3分析患者臨床高危因素:通過(guò)藥敏試驗(yàn)從中篩選出多重耐藥,泛耐藥及全耐藥的菌株,根據(jù)CPIS評(píng)分和患者分泌物定量培養(yǎng)的結(jié)果分離出定植菌株10株,感染菌株32株,并收集患者的臨床資料分析其兩組檢出菌宿主之間感染高危因素差別。 4PCR擴(kuò)增外膜蛋白Ompa及BauA基因:根據(jù)GenBank公布的序列,設(shè)計(jì)Ompa(AY485227)及BauA(AY571146)基因的特異性引物。Ompa基因上游引物OMP1-5’ATTACGACGGAAATTGTAAGTAATTT-3’定位于Ompa基因+1一+26bp位堿基,下游引物OMP25’-CGACTCGTTAGAGTCGCTTTTTTATG-3’,定位于Ompa基因+1291一+1317bp位堿基,BauA基因上游引物OMP15’-TGCAAGCCCAACCTCACT-3’定位于BauA基因+4060一+4078bp位堿基;下游引物OMP25’-TTCTCCAGACTTAGGGAT-3’,定位于BauA基因+6642一+6660bp位堿基進(jìn)行PCR擴(kuò)增,將產(chǎn)物在0.8%瓊脂糖凝膠電泳。用凝膠成像系統(tǒng)攝像并保存。 5PCR產(chǎn)物序列分析。 結(jié)果: 1藥敏試驗(yàn)應(yīng)用K-B法檢測(cè)42株鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌均表現(xiàn)為多重耐藥,其中對(duì)頭孢哌酮/舒巴坦耐藥率最低為30.95%,對(duì)頭孢噻肟的耐藥率95.23%。頭孢哌酮為88.10%,氨曲南及米諾環(huán)素分別為97.6%和78.57%;頭孢吡肟、頭孢他啶均為76.20%,慶大霉素、阿米卡星均為85.72%;哌拉西林與左氧氟沙星均為83.34%;復(fù)方新諾明為73.81%,對(duì)亞胺培南及比阿培南耐藥率分別為73.81%、92.86%,氯霉素的耐藥性69.05%,環(huán)丙沙星為90.48%。 2分析患者臨床高危因素:通過(guò)復(fù)習(xí)病歷收集多重耐藥鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌定植或感染患者的臨床資料(年齡、性別、醫(yī)學(xué)合并癥、ICU住院時(shí)間、侵入性操作及其持續(xù)時(shí)間、預(yù)后等資料)、結(jié)合臨床干預(yù)效果42株菌株分為定植組10例、感染組32例。最常見(jiàn)的暴露因素為:入住ICU,機(jī)械通氣,其他侵入性操作。最常見(jiàn)的基礎(chǔ)疾病為:腦血管病,其次為慢性阻塞性肺疾病。對(duì)于定植組與感染組臨床收集的資料無(wú)明顯統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。感染組的死亡率大于定植組,但是兩組的死亡率差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(15.66%vs10%,P0.05)。但是對(duì)于ICU患者的定植與感染組中,感染組患者ICU的住院時(shí)間明顯大于定植組(P0.05)有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。 3PCR法細(xì)菌包膜蛋白測(cè)定:BauA定植組(陽(yáng)性率70%,陰性率30%),感染組(陽(yáng)性率53.13%,陰性率46.87%)。通過(guò)卡方檢驗(yàn)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法分析其兩者的構(gòu)成比,P>0.05,OmpA定植組(陽(yáng)性率80%,陰性率20%),感染組(陽(yáng)性率87.5%,陰性率12.5%)。通過(guò)卡方檢驗(yàn)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法分析其兩者的構(gòu)成比,P>0.05,說(shuō)明兩者之間包膜蛋白構(gòu)成比差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,尚不能認(rèn)為定植組與感染組之間細(xì)菌的致病力與這兩種蛋白之間有關(guān)。 結(jié)論: 1本實(shí)驗(yàn)通過(guò)藥敏分析了河北省4家醫(yī)院收集的鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌的耐藥情況。對(duì)頭孢哌酮\舒巴坦耐藥率最低為30.95%,對(duì)氨曲南的耐藥率最高,達(dá)到了97.60%,對(duì)碳青酶烯類(lèi)耐藥率也在73.81%到92.86%之間。 2定植組與感染組在臨床高危因素方面沒(méi)有明顯區(qū)別,在死亡率上也沒(méi)有區(qū)別。但I(xiàn)CU入住時(shí)間在定植與感染組中有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異,說(shuō)明入住ICU時(shí)間越長(zhǎng)造成菌株侵襲性機(jī)會(huì)越高。 3通過(guò)PCR分子生物學(xué)技術(shù)分析包膜蛋白OmpA在兩組之間無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異,與鐵相關(guān)的外膜轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn)蛋白BauA在定植組與感染組之間也無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。尚不能認(rèn)為這兩種蛋白產(chǎn)生水平與泛耐藥鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌致病性相關(guān)。可能與其他毒力蛋白及患者免疫狀態(tài)的關(guān)系可能更密切。
[Abstract]:Objective : To investigate the relationship between bacterial resistance and pathogenic state in patients with lower respiratory tract infection in ICU . 10 strains of colonization and 32 strains of infection were isolated .
Method :
1 . Source : Collection of 42 strains of acinetobacter baumanii from 4 hospitals in Hebei Province in 2011 - 2012 .
2 Drug sensitivity test : The susceptibility of isolated baumanii was identified by K - B method . The susceptibility to antibiotics was determined according to the 2008 edition of American Clinical Laboratory Standardization Committee ( NCCLS ) .
3 . The clinical and high risk factors of the patients were analyzed . The strains with multiple drug resistance , pan - resistance and total resistance were screened from the drug - sensitive test , 10 strains were isolated according to CPIS score and quantitative culture of the patient ' s secretions , 32 strains were infected , and the clinical data of the patients were collected to analyze the difference of the high risk factors between the two groups .
Ompa ( AY485227 ) and BauA ( AY571146 ) gene were amplified by 4PCR . Ompa ( AY485227 ) and BauA ( AY571146 ) gene specific primers were designed according to the published sequence . The upstream primer of Ompa gene was located at the base of Ompa gene + 1 + 26bp . The upstream primer OMP15 ' - TGCAAGCCCAACCTCACT - 3 ' was located at the base of BauA gene + 4060 + 4078bp .
The downstream primer OMP25 ' - TTCTCCAGACT TAGGGAT - 3 ' was subjected to PCR amplification at the base of the BauA gene + 6642 I + 6660bp , and the product was subjected to gel electrophoresis of 0.8 % agarose gel .
5PCR product sequence analysis .
Results :
The drug resistance rate was 30.95 % , the drug resistance rate was 95.23 % , 80.10 % , 97.6 % and 78.57 % respectively .
Cefepime and ceftazidine were 76.20 % and 85.72 % respectively .
Piperacillin and levofloxacin were 83.34 % ;
The drug resistance rates were 73.81 % , 73.81 % , 92.86 % , 69.05 % and 90.48 % respectively .
The clinical data ( age , sex , medical complications , ICU admission time , invasive operation , duration and prognosis ) of patients with multiple drug resistance were analyzed . The most common underlying diseases were cerebrovascular disease , followed by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . The most common underlying diseases were : cerebrovascular disease , followed by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . The mortality rate in the infection group was higher than that in the colonization group , but there was no significant difference between the two groups ( 15.66 % vs 10 % , P0.05 ) . However , in the patients with ICU and infection group , the hospitalization time of ICU in the infection group was significantly higher than that in the colonization group ( P0.05 ) .
Detection of bacterial envelope protein by 3PCR method : BauA colonization group ( positive rate 70 % , negative rate 30 % ) , infection group ( positive rate 53.13 % , negative rate 46.87 % ) . By means of Chi - square test , the composition ratio , P & gt ; 0.05 , OmpA colonization group ( positive rate 80 % , negative rate 20 % ) , infection group ( positive rate 87.5 % , negative rate 12.5 % ) were analyzed . By means of Chi - square test , the composition ratio of the two proteins was analyzed by means of Chi - square test , P > 0.05 . The difference between the two proteins was not considered statistically significant , and it was not considered that the pathogenicity of bacteria between the colonization group and the infection group was related to the two proteins .
Conclusion :
1 . The drug resistance of baumanii collected by 4 hospitals in Hebei Province was analyzed by drug sensitivity . The drug resistance rate was 30 . 95 % , and the drug resistance rate to aztreonam was the highest , reaching 97.60 % , and the drug resistance rate was 73.81 % to 92.86 % .
There was no significant difference between the 2 colonization group and the infection group in the clinical high risk factors , but there was no difference in mortality rate . However , the ICU stay time had statistical difference in the colonization and infection group , indicating that the longer the ICU time , the higher the chance of invasive ability of the strain .
3 . There was no statistical difference between the two groups by PCR molecular biology technique . There was no statistical difference between the two groups .
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河北醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:R516;R459.7
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 周慶濤;賀蓓;姚貝;劉振英;張捷;;耐碳青霉烯鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌醫(yī)院內(nèi)播散和感染患者預(yù)后分析(英文)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2011年02期
2 閻錫新,王海賓,吳亞麗,王保法;RICU有創(chuàng)通氣患者下呼吸道感染病原菌研究[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué).呼吸系統(tǒng)分冊(cè);2005年01期
3 佘婷婷;徐元宏;沈繼錄;;耐碳青霉烯類(lèi)鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌外膜蛋白研究進(jìn)展[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)藥(抗生素分冊(cè));2011年02期
4 張凱華;劉雙全;任林;王秋平;尹文君;張秋桂;;鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌感染的臨床調(diào)查與耐藥情況分析[J];當(dāng)代醫(yī)學(xué);2012年33期
5 朱愛(ài)萍;單艷華;朱彥;李健;;ICU多重耐藥鮑曼不動(dòng)桿菌感染監(jiān)測(cè)與分析[J];護(hù)理實(shí)踐與研究;2011年10期
6 汪復(fù);朱德妹;胡付品;阮斐怡;倪語(yǔ)星;孫景勇;徐英春;孫宏莉;胡云健;艾效曼;俞云松;楊青;孫自鏞;簡(jiǎn)翠;賈蓓;黃文祥;卓超;蘇丹虹;魏蓮花;吳玲;張朝霞;季萍;王傳清;薛建昌;張泓;李萬(wàn)華;;2007年中國(guó)CHINET細(xì)菌耐藥性監(jiān)測(cè)[J];中國(guó)感染與化療雜志;2008年05期
7 張麗娟;史金英;梁桂琴;楊?lèi)?ài)從;閻錫新;;多重耐藥革蘭陰性桿菌重癥下呼吸道感染臨床分析[J];臨床薈萃;2010年21期
8 羅柳林;應(yīng)春妹;倪培華;葉楊芹;汪雅萍;張灝e
本文編號(hào):1855904
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/chuanranbingxuelunwen/1855904.html