小說(shuō)《簡(jiǎn)愛(ài)》戀人沖突話(huà)語(yǔ)分析
[Abstract]:Conflict discourse narrowly refers to a speech act, such as disagreeing with (disagreeing), against (opposing) and arguing with (arguing); In a broad sense, it refers to a speech event, such as conflict discourse, (adversative episode), dissenting discourse, (oppositional argument) quarrelling, (quarrel), and rebuttal (disputing), and so on. Conflict discourse in a broad sense and conflict discourse in a narrow sense have a common feature: a state of opposition or disagreement between the speaker and the hearer in the use of language due to their differences of opinion. Conflict discourse has attracted much attention in many fields. Researchers at home and abroad have studied it from different angles, such as pragmatics, anthropology, sociology, psychology and so on. Based on speech act theory and politeness theory and conversational analysis, this paper analyzes the conflict discourse between a couple of lovers, Jane and Rochester in the novel Jane Eyre. The paper is divided into six chapters. Chapters 1 to 4 introduce the purpose, significance and structure of the research, literature review, theoretical framework and data introduction. The fifth to sixth chapters, the specific analysis of the discourse conflict between lovers in the novel. It is found that in the conflict, Jane and Rochester use the anti-declarative (counterclaim) strategy more often than other strategies, but seldom use the face-free strategy (focus-shifting). In view of this result, this paper proposes four factors that influence the choice of strategy, namely, politeness factor, social status factor, gender difference factor and feminism factor. To some extent, this thesis can supplement and enrich the existing pragmatic studies on Jane Eyre. Of course, there are many factors involved in the conflict between lovers, and more people need to explore it further.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:I561.074
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 周彥軍;何春霞;;小說(shuō)沖突話(huà)語(yǔ)分析[J];長(zhǎng)沙大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期
2 顧曰國(guó);John Searle的言語(yǔ)行為理論:評(píng)判與借鑒[J];國(guó)外語(yǔ)言學(xué);1994年03期
3 趙英玲;沖突話(huà)語(yǔ)分析[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2004年05期
4 許炳坤;;英語(yǔ)電視新聞訪(fǎng)談中的沖突話(huà)語(yǔ)分析[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2009年01期
5 鄭社養(yǎng);言語(yǔ)行為理論與外語(yǔ)教學(xué)[J];韶關(guān)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年07期
6 趙忠德,張琳;從關(guān)聯(lián)理論看話(huà)語(yǔ)沖突[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2005年01期
7 冉永平;;沖突性話(huà)語(yǔ)的語(yǔ)用學(xué)研究概述[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2010年01期
8 段開(kāi)成;舍爾的言語(yǔ)行為理論[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;1988年04期
9 顧曰國(guó);奧斯汀的言語(yǔ)行為理論:詮釋與批判[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;1989年01期
10 冉永平;侯海冰;;人際沖突下隱含修正用意的語(yǔ)用分析[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;2009年06期
,本文編號(hào):2345485
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/2345485.html