本文選題：后殖民理論 + 文化霸權(quán)　； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：后殖民理論作為20世紀(jì)風(fēng)行一時的理論一產(chǎn)生很快就風(fēng)靡全球,后殖民文學(xué)作為當(dāng)今文學(xué)界不容小覷的一個創(chuàng)作潮流,與后殖民理論有著某種不可分割的關(guān)聯(lián)。本文借用后殖民理論來對后殖民文學(xué)文本進(jìn)行解讀,一方面發(fā)掘早期西方經(jīng)典文本中的殖民意識,達(dá)到“解構(gòu)”經(jīng)典文本的目的；另一方面關(guān)注后殖民文學(xué)的興起與發(fā)展概況,起到“建構(gòu)”文本的目的。回顧歷史,帝國主義對殖民地的侵略已是一個不爭的事實(shí)和不容篡改的歷史,我們應(yīng)該認(rèn)識到伴隨著軍事、經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治的殖民侵略的同時,西方殖民者還對殖民地的文化進(jìn)行了侵略和改寫,即推行文化“殖民主義”,而且文化殖民的手段多樣,包括：宗教殖民、語言殖民、文學(xué)殖民等。相對于政治和經(jīng)濟(jì)殖民,文化殖民對殖民地帶來的影響更加巨大和深遠(yuǎn)。哪怕是殖民體系解體之后,帝國主義的文化霸權(quán)意識依然存在,而且在新時期有了新的推廣和演變形式,面對文化全球化,民族文化是堅(jiān)持本土化還是積極應(yīng)對文化全球化,是一個值得思考的命題。西方文化霸權(quán)意識多反映在文本上并借助文本進(jìn)行推廣,因此我們要運(yùn)用后殖民理論對這些文本進(jìn)行解讀,以達(dá)到消解西方中心主義話語,促進(jìn)東西方平等對話的目的。本文把后殖民理論作為依托,選取能闡釋后殖民文學(xué)的代表作家作品進(jìn)行文本解讀,試圖以文本尤其是小說這種世界性的文學(xué)形式作為切入點(diǎn)來揭示西方文化霸權(quán),用現(xiàn)實(shí)的文本直接對應(yīng)于西方文化霸權(quán)實(shí)踐,同時,在對文本的解讀過程中,更加形象直觀地闡釋后殖民理論。
[Abstract]:As a popular theory in the 20th century, postcolonial theory soon became popular all over the world. Post-colonial literature, as a creative trend that can not be underestimated in literary circles, has some inseparable relationship with postcolonial theory. This paper uses postcolonial theory to interpret the texts of postcolonial literature. On the one hand, it explores the colonial consciousness in the early classical texts of the West to achieve the purpose of "deconstructing" the classical texts; on the other hand, it pays close attention to the rise and development of post-colonial literature. It serves the purpose of "constructing" the text. Looking back on history, the imperialist aggression against the colonies has become an indisputable fact and a history that cannot be tampered with. We should realize that the colonial aggression accompanied by military, economic and political aggression should be accompanied by, Western colonists also invaded and rewritten the culture of the colonies, that is, to carry out cultural "colonialism", and the means of cultural colonization were various, including religious colonization, language colonization, literary colonization and so on. Compared with the political and economic colonization, the cultural colonization brings more profound and profound influence to the colonies. Even after the disintegration of the colonial system, the cultural hegemony consciousness of imperialism still exists, and in the new era, there are new forms of promotion and evolution. In the face of cultural globalization, whether national culture insists on localization or actively responds to cultural globalization, It is a proposition worth thinking about. The sense of Western cultural hegemony is mostly reflected in the text and popularized with the help of the text. Therefore, we should use the post-colonial theory to interpret these texts in order to dispel the discourse of western centrism and promote the equal dialogue between the East and the West. Based on the postcolonial theory, this paper chooses the representative writers and works which can explain the post-colonial literature to interpret the text, and tries to reveal the western cultural hegemony with the text, especially the novel, as the world literary form as the starting point. The text directly corresponds to the practice of western cultural hegemony. Meanwhile, in the process of interpreting the text, the post-colonial theory is explained more vividly and intuitively.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：I109

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張寬;;歐美人眼中的“非我族類”[J];讀書;1993年09期

2 張中載;《印度之行》不和諧的雙聲:反殖民主義與殖民主義話語[J];外國文學(xué);2000年03期

3 谷紅麗;《簡·愛》和《蒼海茫茫》中的殖民主義話語[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

4 郭英劍;帶鐐銬的文化帝國主義[J];民族藝術(shù);2000年01期

5 姚新勇;危險(xiǎn)“文化帝國主義”[J];民族藝術(shù);2000年01期

6 劉俐俐;傳統(tǒng)在全球化中的意義[J];人民論壇;2001年03期

7 駱文琳;解讀《印度之行》中的殖民主義意識[J];四川外語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

8 阿里夫·德里克,施山;后殖民的輝光:全球資本主義時代的第三世界批評[J];國外文學(xué);1997年01期

9 王岳川;東西方文化視界中的“后殖民主義”[J];中國音樂;1995年01期

10 王寧;;逆寫的文學(xué): 后殖民文學(xué)的歷史意義和當(dāng)代價(jià)值[J];外國文學(xué)研究;2011年05期

，

本文編號：1797198