本文選題：特朗斯特羅姆　切入點：現(xiàn)代　出處：《遼寧師范大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：特朗斯特羅姆，是當代瑞典最著名的詩人，是2011年諾貝爾文學獎的獲得者。雖然他的詩歌自1983年就被北島譯介到國內(nèi)，且詩人在國際上享有盛譽，但是，國內(nèi)對他的研究卻還很不足。除了一些鑒賞性、記述性的文字外，真正屬于學術性的詩歌批評的還不多。在后現(xiàn)代的語境下，文學何為，詩歌何為，它們能否在大眾文化甚囂塵上之時，有效地在場，是需要我們認真地思考的。因此，從后現(xiàn)代的視域出發(fā)，對特朗斯特羅姆的詩歌進行細致而全面的研究不僅是必要的，而且是有價值的。 從現(xiàn)代到后現(xiàn)代語境的嬗變是詩人成長的背景與創(chuàng)作的土壤。因此，筆者對“現(xiàn)代”、“現(xiàn)代性”、“后現(xiàn)代”、“后現(xiàn)代性”等幾個術語分別具有的不同的內(nèi)涵和指向進行了簡要地梳理。藉此，可以發(fā)現(xiàn)，現(xiàn)代性具有審美的、歷史范疇的、系統(tǒng)規(guī)劃的與人本主義的等四個主要的剖面。而后現(xiàn)代，既是指一種知識狀況，也是指一種精神樣態(tài)。對前者，筆者借助于J.L.奧斯汀的言語行為理論重新進行了闡釋；而對后者，筆者繼承了弗雷德里克·杰姆遜的思想，從思維的漂浮感、淺薄微弱的歷史感、情感的消逝與技術烏托邦的幻象四個方面進行了描述。而詩人正是面向著后現(xiàn)代的狀況在進行卓越的創(chuàng)作。 特朗斯特羅姆繼承了現(xiàn)代主義的詩歌風格，常常被稱為象征主義和超現(xiàn)實主義詩人，因此從現(xiàn)代主義詩歌的演變出發(fā)，來分析、概括他的整體詩風，便成為一條有效的路徑。藉此，筆者認為，，特氏在五個方面發(fā)展、超越了以往的現(xiàn)代主義詩歌：藉敞開、增強事物的本質(zhì)與屬性投射情感；多向度探索語言的可能，賦予其多官能的效果；精確、堅實、深邃而精湛的意象鍛造與閃現(xiàn)靈韻的意境營構(gòu)；起伏跌宕的內(nèi)外節(jié)奏與獨具匠心的形式；涵蘊深摯而有良知的社會責任感。 而為了更好地呈現(xiàn)特朗斯特羅姆詩歌的獨特，筆者選取《果戈理》與《孤獨》兩首詩進行了細讀，它們在不同程度上具有上述的特點。在終極指向上，它們表達著詩人對跌入后現(xiàn)代困境之人的關懷，而不同之處在于，在《果戈理》中，在主體——果戈理——的分裂與彌合中內(nèi)蘊著一份人性的悲憫；在《孤獨》中，詩人對比了主體分別與兩個他者之間的關系的不同，藉此對孤獨進行了深邃而辯證的思考。
[Abstract]:Trent Strom, the most famous poet of contemporary Sweden, is the winner of the 2011 Nobel Prize for Literature. Although his poetry has been translated and introduced to China since 1983, and the poet enjoys a high reputation internationally, Except for some appreciative and descriptive words, there are not many truly academic poetic criticisms. In the post-modern context, what is the meaning of literature and what is poetry? Whether they can be present effectively at a time when popular culture is rampant requires us to think carefully. Therefore, from the perspective of post-modern, it is not only necessary to conduct a detailed and comprehensive study of Tran Strom's poems. And it's valuable. The evolution of the context from modern to post-modern is the background of the poet's growth and the soil of his creation. The author briefly combs the different connotations and directions of the terms "modern", "modernity", "postmodernism" and "post-modernity" respectively. There are four main sections of systematic planning and humanism. The postmodernism is not only a kind of knowledge situation but also a kind of mental state. For the former, the author reinterprets the former with the help of J. LAusten's speech act theory. To the latter, the author inherited Frederick Jefferson's thought, from the floating feeling of thinking, the shallow and weak sense of history, The disappearance of emotion and the illusion of technological utopia are described in four aspects. Tran Strom inherited the poetic style of modernism, which is often called symbolism and surrealism poet. Therefore, from the evolution of modernism poetry, he analyzes and generalizes his overall poetic style. In this way, he developed in five ways, surpassing the modernist poems of the past: by opening up to enhance the nature and attributes of things to project emotions, and by exploring the possibilities of language in many directions. It is endowed with multi-functional effect; precise, solid, profound and exquisite image forging and flickering spirit of artistic conception; ups and downs of the internal and external rhythm and unique form; the connotation of a deep and conscience sense of social responsibility. In order to better present the unique features of Tran Strom's poems, the author chooses Gogol and Lonely to read them in detail, which have the above characteristics to some extent. They express the poet's concern for those who fall into post-modern dilemmas, but the difference is that in Gogol, in the division and healing of the main body, Gogol, there is a human compassion; in Solitude, The poet contrasts the relationship between the subject and the two others and makes a profound and dialectical thinking of loneliness.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：I532.072

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 林和生;和自己的影子結(jié)合——特朗斯特羅姆詩作的柏拉圖意向[J];當代文壇;2005年04期

2 陳東東;杜鵑侵巢的儀式[J];讀書;2001年09期

3 亞思明;;詩意棲居的中間地帶——北島創(chuàng)作與翻譯文學的關系探析[J];東岳論叢;2012年05期

4 李笠;;詞不是語言——讀托馬斯·特朗斯特羅姆的《自1979年3月》[J];當代作家評論;2011年06期

5 李笠;;神秘是詩歌的前提——讀托馬斯·特朗斯特羅姆的《車站》[J];當代作家評論;2011年06期

6 黃禮孩;;成為特朗斯特羅姆[J];名作欣賞;2011年31期

7 木葉;;一個詩人的分身術 讀特朗斯特羅姆[J];上海文化;2012年01期

8 白長鴻;;托馬斯·特朗斯特羅姆對中國詩歌創(chuàng)作的借鑒意義[J];詩潮;2011年12期

9 王飛;王光明;;“他帶來了一個神秘世界的口信”——談特朗斯特羅姆的詩歌[J];藝術評論;2012年01期

10 葉櫓;;詩性陳述背后……——讀特朗斯特羅姆《孤獨》[J];揚子江詩刊;2011年06期

本文編號：1693151