本文關(guān)鍵詞：列維納斯為他者倫理學(xué)視野下的庫(kù)切文本《�！分芯�　出處：《廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 《�！� 庫(kù)切 列維納斯 本體論 同化

【摘要】：本論文對(duì)后殖民時(shí)代背景下的殖民者/被殖民者,女/男,作者/角色三對(duì)二元對(duì)立的倫理關(guān)系進(jìn)行了為他者倫理方面的探討。通過(guò)細(xì)致的文本閱讀,作者力圖證明在南非的后殖民背景下,小說(shuō)家?guī)烨型高^(guò)小說(shuō)《�！穼�(duì)上述三對(duì)倫理關(guān)系進(jìn)行了相關(guān)闡釋并且其倫理主張與列維納斯的為他者倫理學(xué)相吻合,也就是后殖民時(shí)代中自我對(duì)他者負(fù)有不可推卸的責(zé)任,自我必須無(wú)條件尊重他者的選擇和存在。庫(kù)切認(rèn)為,現(xiàn)代文明對(duì)世界的了解和探索都是建立在對(duì)事物的本體論認(rèn)知上。自我通過(guò)對(duì)他者的同化獲取知識(shí),也即是消滅他者的他性并把他們納入自我的認(rèn)知系統(tǒng)當(dāng)中。因此,為了抵制這種具有殺戮性質(zhì)的認(rèn)知傾向,還世界以真正的和平,庫(kù)切認(rèn)為通過(guò)星期五的沉默和身體符號(hào),克魯索鬼魂的縈擾,蘇珊的歷史再敘述質(zhì)疑西方經(jīng)典,還他者以聲音,提倡一種對(duì)他者絕對(duì)負(fù)責(zé)的倫理觀具有迫切的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文總共包括五個(gè)章節(jié)。第一章重點(diǎn)介紹了庫(kù)切及其作品《�！�,相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)綜述,論文研究的理論框架和中心論點(diǎn)。第二章主要針對(duì)殖民系統(tǒng)中語(yǔ)言與同者的合謀和他者對(duì)壓迫的反抗對(duì)殖民關(guān)系進(jìn)行解讀。通過(guò)被殖民者的反抗,庫(kù)切質(zhì)疑了西方話語(yǔ)中對(duì)他者的殖民壓迫,提倡以尊重他者的他性為前提的深入歷史真相的倫理審視。第三章重點(diǎn)闡釋了女/男二元對(duì)立關(guān)系。庫(kù)切對(duì)兩性關(guān)系的解構(gòu)結(jié)果表明,女性在兩性關(guān)系中上升到主導(dǎo)地位并且壓迫男性他者。庫(kù)切認(rèn)為兩性之間的這種互相壓迫是由背后的本體論認(rèn)知思維方式?jīng)Q定的,因此他通過(guò)男性他者鬼魂的縈擾暗示人們提倡一種對(duì)他者絕對(duì)負(fù)責(zé)的倫理觀的重要性。第四章討論了作者和角色之間的寫(xiě)作倫理。通過(guò)給角色以自由敘述歷史的聲音,庫(kù)切針對(duì)西方經(jīng)典中對(duì)他者的無(wú)視和寫(xiě)作的本身的含混性進(jìn)行了聚焦和探討,從而質(zhì)疑了西方經(jīng)典對(duì)歷史反映的真實(shí)性和作家寫(xiě)作的權(quán)威性。第五章總結(jié)了庫(kù)切在以上三對(duì)二元對(duì)立關(guān)系中所表現(xiàn)出來(lái)的倫理態(tài)度,并且認(rèn)為庫(kù)切通過(guò)模糊化的寫(xiě)作策略,表達(dá)了他的為他者的倫理主張。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the ethical relationship of duality between colonizers / colonizers, women / men, and writers / characters in the context of the post-colonial era. The author tries to prove that in the post-colonial background of South Africa, novelist Coetzee interprets these three pairs of ethical relationships through the novel "bliss", and his ethical claims coincide with Levinas' ethics of the other. That is, in the post-colonial era, the ego has an unshirkable responsibility to the other, and the ego must unconditionally respect the choice and existence of the other. Modern civilization's understanding and exploration of the world are based on the ontological cognition of things. Self acquires knowledge through assimilation of others. That is, to eliminate the otherness and to incorporate them into the ego's cognitive system. Therefore, in order to resist this tendency of killing, the world is truly at peace. Kuche believes that through Friday's silence and body symbols, Crusoe's ghost haunts, Susan's historical narration questions the Western classics, and returns his voice to the others. It is of urgent practical significance to advocate an ethical view of absolute responsibility to the other. This paper consists of five chapters. The first chapter focuses on the introduction of Kuche and his works, the related literature review. The second chapter mainly focuses on the collusion between language and the same person in the colonial system and the resistance of the other to oppression. The second chapter interprets the colonial relationship through the resistance of the colonized. Kuche questioned the colonial oppression of the other in Western discourse. The third chapter focuses on the explanation of the duality between women and men. Kuche's deconstruction of gender relations shows that the relationship between the two sexes is deconstructed. Women rise to the dominant position in the gender relationship and oppress the other of the male. Kuche believes that the oppression between the two sexes is determined by the ontological cognitive thinking behind it. So he hinted at the importance of promoting an ethic of absolute responsibility to the other through the haunting of the ghost of the other. Chapter 4th discusses the ethics of writing between the author and the character. Sound. Kuche focuses on the neglect of the other and the ambiguity of his writing in the western classics. In order to question the authenticity of the Western classics to the historical reflection and the authoritativeness of the writer's writing, chapter 5th summarizes the ethical attitude of Kuche in the above three pairs of dualistic opposites. Furthermore, Kucht expresses his ethical ideas of the other through his fuzzifying writing strategy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：I478.074

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 任海燕;;探索殖民語(yǔ)境中再現(xiàn)與權(quán)力的關(guān)系——庫(kù)切小說(shuō)《�！穼�(duì)魯濱遜神話的改寫(xiě)[J];外國(guó)文學(xué);2009年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1422127