本文選題：膝半月板　切入點(diǎn)：手術(shù)徑路　出處：《解剖學(xué)研究》2016年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的解剖分析開放式橫型與開放式縱型膝半月板損傷手術(shù)徑路。方法對(duì)成人下肢標(biāo)本52膝隨機(jī)分為兩組各26膝,分別模擬開放式橫型與開放式縱型手術(shù)徑路,解剖觀測(cè)徑路切口及主要相關(guān)結(jié)構(gòu)。結(jié)果膝內(nèi)側(cè)徑路切口縱型長(zhǎng)(78.82±6.36)mm,橫型長(zhǎng)(55.64±9.82)mm;膝外側(cè)徑路切口縱型長(zhǎng)(67.76±6.84)mm;橫型長(zhǎng)(54.82±8.42)mm。結(jié)論開放式橫型徑路比開放式縱型徑路治療半月板損傷切口小,解剖層次結(jié)構(gòu)簡(jiǎn)單,半月板顯露充分;術(shù)后隨訪效果滿意,有望取代開放式縱型徑路。
[Abstract]:Objective to anatomize and analyze the open transverse and longitudinal knee meniscus injury approaches. Methods 52 knees of adult lower extremities were randomly divided into two groups, 26 knees in each group, the open transverse approach and the open longitudinal approach were simulated, respectively. Results the longitudinal length of the medial genicular approach was 78.82 鹵6.36 mm, the transverse length was 55.64 鹵9.82 mm, the lateral knee approach was 67.76 鹵6.84 mm long, the transverse length was 54.82 鹵8.42 mm. Conclusion the open transverse approach is smaller than the open longitudinal approach in the treatment of semilunar injury. The anatomical hierarchy is simple, meniscus is fully exposed, and the follow-up results are satisfactory, which is expected to replace the open longitudinal approach.
【作者單位】： 肇慶醫(yī)學(xué)高等專科學(xué)校人體解剖學(xué)教研室;
【基金】：肇慶市科技創(chuàng)新計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(2012E125) 肇慶醫(yī)學(xué)高等�？茖W(xué)校項(xiàng)目(2012K06)
【分類號(hào)】：R687.4;R322.7

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張德志,張敏;半月板損傷治療[J];錦州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

2 于云聚,史彩芳;半月板損傷的治療進(jìn)展[J];現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志;2000年10期

3 章光峰;半月板損傷的臨床治療[J];衛(wèi)生職業(yè)教育;2002年04期

4 胡劍華;半月板損傷誤診三例報(bào)告[J];江西醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

5 趙漢平,孫磊,李佩佳,郭秀婷,李葉紅;臨床檢查對(duì)半月板損傷的診斷價(jià)值[J];中國(guó)矯形外科雜志;2002年07期

6 洪時(shí)清 ,張繼Z，

本文編號(hào)：1605057