發(fā)布時(shí)間：2023-06-08 20:23

　　理想化認(rèn)知模型(ICM)是第二代認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)家Lakoff在1982年和1987年基于體驗(yàn)哲學(xué)和原型范疇等理論提出的,含命題結(jié)構(gòu)、意象圖式、隱喻映射和轉(zhuǎn)喻映射四種原則,以此解釋概念結(jié)構(gòu)、語(yǔ)義范疇和范疇化。以往的學(xué)者認(rèn)為ICM僅限于原型范疇的討論,但我們通過(guò)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)三大問(wèn)題:首先, ICM四大原則之一的“命題原則”,具有客觀性,并帶有第一代認(rèn)知科學(xué)的部分特征,可以將其追溯到以客觀主義為基礎(chǔ)的第一代認(rèn)知科學(xué)理論框架下。其次,ICM的提出是為了解決原型范疇的層級(jí)性問(wèn)題,ICM相對(duì)于認(rèn)知模型(CM)具有層級(jí)性,但又不能脫離其帶有線性特征的原型范疇理論基礎(chǔ)。再次,ICM跟CM的關(guān)系不自洽,一方面ICM具有CM的普遍性特征,另一方面,ICM又是基于CM間家族相似度的差異性相加。因此本文最后作出如下結(jié)論:ICM雖然源于原型范疇理論,但也包含經(jīng)典范疇的某些特征;其理論可追溯至經(jīng)典邏輯;其理論建構(gòu)具有不自洽性。 認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)主要圍繞ICM的非客觀性、心智層級(jí)和ICM的原型范疇特征提出了各自的觀點(diǎn),但是沒(méi)有論述并對(duì)比ICM的主觀層級(jí)體系和客觀層級(jí)(即經(jīng)典范疇層級(jí)體系)的關(guān)聯(lián),并將ICM中的客觀性追溯到經(jīng)典范疇...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：70 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Rationale for the Study
    1.2 Objectives
    1.3 Methodology
    1.4 Layout
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Hierarchy of ICM
        2.2.1 Review of CM
        2.2.2 Previous Studies on ICM
        2.2.3 Preview of Levels of Conceptual Domains
        2.2.4 In What Sense Is ICM Hierarchical
    2.3 Non-objectivism of Propositional ICMs
        2.3.1 Preview of Propositional ICMs
        2.3.2 Logic Background of ICMs
        2.3.3 Previous Studies on Non-objectivism
        2.3.4 In What Sense Is ICM Non-objective
    2.4 Category Study of ICMs
        2.4.1.C ategory Study of ICMs within the Prototypical Approach
        2.4.2 Category Study of ICMs within the Classical Approach
        2.4.3 Contrasts between Classical Theory and Prototype Theory
    2.5 Gaps
Chapter Three Rethinking ICMs
    3.1 The Role of ICM in Cognitive Linguistics
        3.1.1 The Merits of ICMs
        3.1.2 The Limits of ICMs
    3.2 Philosophic Background of ICMs
    3.3 Contradictions of ICM Theory
Chapter Four Contradictions of ICMs
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Locating ICM as the Interface of, and Tension between, Hierarchy and Linearity
        4.2.1 Locating Family Resemblance as Linearity
        4.2.2 Locating ICM as Linearity
        4.2.3 Summary
    4.3 Locating Propositional ICM as the Interface of, and Tension between, Objectivity and Non-objectivity
        4.3.1 Locating Propositional ICM as Formal Logic
            4.3.1.1 Locating Propositional ICM as Intensional Logic
            4.3.1.2 Locating Intensional Logic as Formal Logic
            4.3.1.3 Locating Propositional ICM as Formal Logic
        4.3.2 Locating Propositional ICM as Objective
        4.3.3 Summary
    4.4 Summarizing ICM as the Interface of, and Tension between, Logic and Perception, Essence and Phenomenon
        4.4.1 Prototype Effects and Classical Features in ICMs
        4.4.2 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Studies
References



本文編號(hào)：3832429