批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析把語(yǔ)言看作一種社會(huì)實(shí)踐,認(rèn)為語(yǔ)言構(gòu)建語(yǔ)篇生成者的意識(shí)形態(tài),旨在揭示語(yǔ)言、權(quán)力和意識(shí)形態(tài)之間的關(guān)系,為社會(huì)學(xué)研究提供了一個(gè)新的視角和方法。批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析主張?jiān)诜治鲞^(guò)程中納入社會(huì)政治視角,政治語(yǔ)篇是批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的熱點(diǎn)之一。本文以十篇政治官方道歉文件為例,對(duì)政治語(yǔ)篇作批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析,目的在于揭示政治道歉文件背后隱藏的意識(shí)形態(tài):即努力挽回冒犯方即道歉文件生成者所代表的統(tǒng)治者或者政府的形象和信譽(yù),甚至為其進(jìn)行自我辯護(hù),使責(zé)任最小化等,以達(dá)到修補(bǔ)與被冒犯者的關(guān)系。本文采用Fairclough的三維分析框架:描述,闡釋和解釋。首先以Halliday的系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)法為分析工具對(duì)語(yǔ)篇的語(yǔ)言特征進(jìn)行描述,然后分析語(yǔ)篇中語(yǔ)篇參與者與語(yǔ)篇的幾組關(guān)系闡釋語(yǔ)篇的生成過(guò)程,最后從社會(huì)實(shí)踐的角度分析語(yǔ)篇生成的社會(huì)背景,以及相關(guān)的社會(huì)活動(dòng)從而解釋說(shuō)明社會(huì)因素與語(yǔ)篇的相互作用。在政治道歉的語(yǔ)篇中意識(shí)形態(tài)在不同層次都有所體現(xiàn)。文本中各種過(guò)程的選擇,被動(dòng)語(yǔ)態(tài)的選擇,以及關(guān)鍵詞匯的選擇,名詞化的使用等都在不同程度上體現(xiàn)著語(yǔ)篇生成者的意識(shí)形態(tài)。本文的研究將拓展官方道歉文件的研究領(lǐng)域;同時(shí)有助于增強(qiáng)人們的批評(píng)性語(yǔ)言意識(shí),提高... 

【文章來(lái)源】：河北師范大學(xué)河北省

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：76 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Purpose of the study
    1.2 Significance of the Study
    1.3 Organization of the thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Studies on CDA
        2.1.1 Notion and aims of CDA
        2.1.2 Language, power and ideology
        2.1.3 Previous studies on CDA
    2.2 Studies on political official apologies
        2.2.1 Features of political official apologies
        2.2.2 Previous studies of political official apologies
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Fairclough’s three-dimensional model
    3.2 Analytical tools: Halliday’s Systemic-Functional Grammar
        3.2.1 Transitivity
        3.2.2 Lexical classification
        3.2.3 Transformation
            3.2.3.1 Passivization
            3.2.3.2 Nominalization
Chapter Four Data Analysis
    4.1 Data collection
    4.2 Textual level analysis
        4.2.1 Transitivity---the choice of process
            4.2.1.1 Existential process
            4.2.1.2 Material process
            4.2.1.3 Relational process
            4.2.1.4 Verbal process
            4.2.1.5 Mental process
        4.2.2 Lexical Classification---the choice of words
            4.2.2.1 The choice of apologetic words
            4.2.2.2 The choice of the vague words
        4.2.3 Transformation
            4.2.3.1 The choice of nominalization
            4.2.3.2 The choice of passivization
    4.3 Discourse level analysis: Interpretation
        4.3.1 The contents and the participants of the discourse
        4.3.2 The role of language in the discourse
    4.4 Social Practice level: Explanation
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Findings of the study
    5.2 Major contributions
    5.3 Major limitations and further directions
Bibliography
Appendix
    Sample 1
    Sample 2
    Sample 3
    Sample 4
    Sample 5
    Sample 6
    Sample 7
    Sample 8
    Sample 9
    Sample 10
Acknowledgements


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]對(duì)英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者文化霸權(quán)話語(yǔ)解讀的批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析[J]. 唐麗萍.  解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào). 2009(04)
[2]批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析概覽[J]. 劉立華.  外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊. 2008(03)
[3]批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的新方法：批評(píng)隱喻分析[J]. 紀(jì)玉華,陳燕.  廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2007(06)
[4]道歉策略對(duì)比分析與第二語(yǔ)言語(yǔ)用能力培養(yǎng)[J]. 鄒白茹.  四川外語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào). 2007(04)
[5]道歉行為的話語(yǔ)模式與語(yǔ)用特點(diǎn)分析[J]. 李軍.  語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究. 2007(01)
[6]托尼·莫里森小說(shuō)《寵兒》語(yǔ)言與權(quán)力現(xiàn)象分析[J]. 章汝雯,周群.  外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2005(12)
[7]對(duì)“道歉語(yǔ)”的語(yǔ)用定量研究[J]. 劉思,劉潤(rùn)清.  外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2005(05)



本文編號(hào)：3531790