本文基于自建語料庫,旨在探索中文房地產(chǎn)文本中所隱含的意義和態(tài)度。受批評語篇分析的啟發(fā),本文從三個層面對房地產(chǎn)文本進(jìn)行研究,即語言形式的描述、話語行為的分析和社會學(xué)角度的解釋。在微觀層面上,對文本數(shù)據(jù)的描述和分析主要集中在對四組房地產(chǎn)關(guān)鍵詞的搭配研究和對四個子語料庫話語特點(diǎn)的分析。在宏觀層面上,本文則從社會學(xué)的角度對微觀層面上得到的相應(yīng)數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)果進(jìn)行解釋。通過以上三個層面的分析,本研究的主要發(fā)現(xiàn)如下:1.本文通過關(guān)鍵詞分析,選取了四組房地產(chǎn)關(guān)鍵詞,分別屬于四個語義組:“價(jià)格”語義組、“政府”語義組、“房地產(chǎn)商”組以及“購房者”組。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),每個關(guān)鍵詞都趨向與特定的搭配詞共現(xiàn),這種共現(xiàn)對關(guān)鍵詞意義的構(gòu)建起到重要的作用。房地產(chǎn)關(guān)鍵詞的語義趨向和語義韻呈現(xiàn)出復(fù)雜甚至是矛盾的解讀,表明房地產(chǎn)話語社團(tuán)的各類成員以自身利益為出發(fā)點(diǎn)參與到詞語意義的建構(gòu)中。2.本文根據(jù)文本作者的身份搜集了四類文本,分別為:政府部門頒布的文件及聲明、主要報(bào)紙和網(wǎng)站發(fā)布的新聞、房地產(chǎn)專業(yè)人士撰寫的博客文章以及網(wǎng)民在網(wǎng)絡(luò)論壇上發(fā)布的文章。對比研究發(fā)現(xiàn),這四類文本具有各自的詞匯特點(diǎn)和話語策略,從而表達(dá)了不同利益群體的態(tài)度并在話語... 

【文章來源】：上海交通大學(xué)上海市 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：122 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Acknowledgements
Table of Contents
List of Tables and Figure
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Rationale of the Study
    1.2 Research Questions
    1.3 Overview of the Housing Issue in China
    1.4 The Housing Discourse
    1.5 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two A Critical Review of the Literature
    2.1 Critical Discourse Analysis
        2.1.1 General Notions and Frameworks
        2.1.2 Discourse, Ideology and Power
        2.1.3 A Three-Dimensional Analytical Framework
        2.1.4 Criticisms of CDA
    2.2 Corpus Linguistics
        2.2.1 Corpus Study of Meaning
        2.2.2 Concordance, Collocation, and Semantic Prosody
        2.2.3 The Role of Corpus in Critical Discourse Analysis
Chapter Three Research Design and Methodology
    3.1 The Housing Text Corpus
    3.2 Analytical Framework
    3.3 Tools and Instruments
    3.4 Procedures and Steps
Chapter Four Keyword Analysis: Revealing the Underlying Meanings of Housing Keywords
    4.1 Keyword Lists: Revealing the Major Issues
    4.2 Collocation and Concordance Analyses: Revealing the Underlying Meanings of Key Housing Keywords
        4.2.1 Semantic Set of PRICE
        4.2.2 Semantic Set of GOVERNMENT
        4.2.3 Semantic Set of BUSINESS PEOPLE IN REAL ESTATE
        4.2.4 Semantic Set of BUYER
    Summary
Chapter Five A Comparative Study: Revealing the Discursive Differences in Sub-Corpora
    5.1 The Government Sub-Corpus
    5.2 The Netizen Sub-Corpus
    5.3 The News Sub-Corpus
    5.4 The Professional Sub-Corpus
    Summary
Chapter Six A Social Context Analysis
    6.1 Network of Interrelationships among the Government, Property Developers and Buyers in Connection with the Housing Price
    6.2 Influence of the Media
    Summary
Chapter Seven Conclusion
    7.1 Summary of the Present Study
    7.2 Collocational Behaviors of Housing Keywords and Discursive Differences in Sub-Corpora
    7.3 Implications and Prospects
Bibliography


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]土地出讓制度對房地產(chǎn)市場績效影響機(jī)制研究——基于制度-行為-績效原理[J]. 馬小剛.  建筑經(jīng)濟(jì). 2009(01)
[2]話語權(quán)失衡下房地產(chǎn)市場中的非市場化行為探析[J]. 宋玉軍.  建筑經(jīng)濟(jì). 2008(07)
[3]報(bào)紙是否為房地產(chǎn)商所“俘虜”[J]. 趙曙光.  傳媒觀察. 2005(07)
[4]房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的制度約束與政府管理[J]. 唐茂華.  建筑經(jīng)濟(jì). 2005(07)
[5]政策因素與中國房地產(chǎn)市場發(fā)展路徑——政府、開發(fā)商、消費(fèi)者三方博弈分析[J]. 楊建榮,孫斌藝.  財(cái)經(jīng)研究. 2004(04)
[6]語義韻研究的一般方法[J]. 衛(wèi)乃興.  外語教學(xué)與研究. 2002(04)
[7]基于語料庫和語料庫驅(qū)動的詞語搭配研究[J]. 衛(wèi)乃興.  當(dāng)代語言學(xué). 2002(02)
[8]語料庫數(shù)據(jù)驅(qū)動的專業(yè)文本語義韻研究[J]. 衛(wèi)乃興.  現(xiàn)代外語. 2002(02)



本文編號：3375875