從1981年,喬姆斯基將“格”研究引進(jìn)生成語言學(xué),并將其發(fā)展為“格理論”,構(gòu)成生成語言學(xué)的一個(gè)模塊以來,“格理論”經(jīng)歷了從管約論其間的“管轄格理論”到簡約論前期的“呼應(yīng)格理論”和后期的“非呼應(yīng)格理論”三個(gè)發(fā)展階段。通過對這三個(gè)階段的對比研究,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)“格理論”的各個(gè)階段均以統(tǒng)一性、精簡性和有效性解釋為旨?xì)w,但每個(gè)階段的理論最終面臨“統(tǒng)一”“精簡”和“有效”的無奈。與此同時(shí),通過對英語語料的詳細(xì)搜集探研以及對法語、漢語、越南語和泰國語“格”問題的深層拷問,我們發(fā)現(xiàn),“格”不是語言所必需的;“格”不是構(gòu)成語言內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)移位的動因;“格”是外在于語言結(jié)構(gòu)的語義解釋。質(zhì)言之,“格”是參數(shù)而非原則。于是,我們在普遍語法框架內(nèi)提出“非格”概念。此觀點(diǎn)源于并參看趙彥春教授未發(fā)表“非格假設(shè)”論文。①主語和謂語是語言結(jié)構(gòu)的必要成分,體現(xiàn)形式為:[S[NP[VP]]]。依據(jù)語言的離散性、層級性、遞歸性特征,句子的必要成分又內(nèi)嵌于普遍邏輯模板之中。②NP之間沒有形態(tài)派生關(guān)系,其形態(tài)在詞庫中固有,以待提取,置入邏輯模板。由此“抽象格”被剔除。③句子之間無派生關(guān)系,均在邏輯模板的調(diào)配下進(jìn)行基礎(chǔ)生成。生成后的句子要... 

【文章來源】：四川外國語大學(xué)重慶市

【文章頁數(shù)】：101 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Motivation
    1.2 Purpose
    1.3 Methodology
    1.4 Significance
    1.5 Organization
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Case Status in GB and MP
        2.2.1 Background Information
        2.2.2 Case Status in GB and MP
    2.3 Case in Government and Binding Theory
        2.3.1 Introduction
        2.3.2 Case Assignment and Syntactic Configuration
        2.3.3 Case Assignment and Modified Syntactic Structure
    2.4 Case in the Minimalist Program
        2.4.1 Early Minimalist Program
        2.4.2 Later Minimalist Program
Chapter Three Invalidity of Case Assignment & Case Checking Mechanism
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Invalidity of Case Assignment Mechanism in GCT
        3.2.1 Theory of “Cases”
            3.2.1.1 Case Filter & Case Assignment
            3.2.1.2 Different Types of Case and UG
        3.2.2 Motivation and Target of Government-based Case Theory
            3.2.2.1 Remedy of the Uniformity of Case Assignment under Government
            3.2.2.2 Advantages of Remedy
            3.2.2.3 Case as a Hidden Cause for DP-movement
        3.2.3 Inquiring Validity of G-CT and its Deficiency
        3.2.4 Summary
    3.3 Invalidity of Case-checking systems in ACT and A-less CT
        3.3.1 Introduction
        3.3.2 Invalidity of Case Checking in ACT
            3.3.2.1 Systematical Mechanism of Agr-based Case Theory
            3.3.2.2 Application of A-CT in Problem Solving
            3.3.2.3 Redundancy and Inefficiency of A-CT
            3.3.2.4 Summary
        3.3.3 Non-effective Remedy --- A-less CT
            3.3.3.1 Mechanism of A-less CT
            3.3.3.2 Inefficiency of A-less CT
            3.3.3.3 Summary
Chapter Four Case: Language Particular but not Language Universal
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Case or Non-Case
        4.2.1 Cross-linguistic Data-based Analysis
        4.2.2 Inquiring the Nature of Non-Case
    4.3 Logical Template & Non-Case
    4.4 Sample Non-Case Analysis
        4.4.1 Introduction
        4.4.2 As Argument
        4.4.3 As Adjunct
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Retrospection
    5.2 Contributions
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions
        5.3.1 Limitations
        5.3.2 Suggestions
References


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]格理論與例外格結(jié)構(gòu)推導(dǎo)[J]. 南潮.  海南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版). 2004(05)
[2]從格理論的變遷看生成語法的發(fā)展[J]. 何曉煒.  學(xué)術(shù)研究. 2004(09)
[3]同源賓語的格研究[J]. 陳晚姑.  齊齊哈爾大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版). 2004(01)
[4]英語主、賓格代詞變異新探[J]. 戴建東.  外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 1999(04)



本文編號：3273206