形式-功能錯位是指語言實體在進入句法環(huán)境后表現(xiàn)出的形式與功能的不同態(tài)現(xiàn)象。在自然語言中,形式-功能錯位的例子并不少見,并且表現(xiàn)在語言描寫的各個層面。形式-功能錯位的句法語義界面研究有助于語法理論的建構(gòu)和發(fā)展。在本文中,我們主要限于短語層面的討論。詞項在使用中表現(xiàn)出的句法組構(gòu)乖戾及語義乖戾無外乎包括兩種結(jié)果：語義阻隔或詞項在句法環(huán)境下的語義適應(yīng)過程。本文主要探討第二種情況。從目前對該問題的研究來看,大體上包括三種解釋途徑,即概念函項和語義算子插入,構(gòu)式壓制以及轉(zhuǎn)／隱喻過程。以上幾種方法各有特點,可以在一定程度上協(xié)調(diào)形式-功能錯位的產(chǎn)生,但他們因?qū)δ骋焕碚撃Ｐ偷钠珢刍蛴捎诮忉尫椒ㄗ陨泶嬖诘木窒薅霈F(xiàn)捉襟見肘,難以應(yīng)付的局面。本文在認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的理論框架下,從語法構(gòu)式和高層轉(zhuǎn)喻兩個方面對形式-功能錯位進行探析。高層轉(zhuǎn)喻與語法構(gòu)式一樣,具有較高的圖示化水平,因而能夠解釋語法結(jié)構(gòu)上的變化。在形式-功能錯位中,詞項表現(xiàn)出的句法組構(gòu)乖戾是參照了其基本的詞匯構(gòu)型和組合規(guī)律,對詞項語義結(jié)構(gòu)的再分析表現(xiàn)為在“優(yōu)先原則”下,通過構(gòu)式壓制,詞項被壓制出相應(yīng)的語義類型,從而實現(xiàn)句法環(huán)境下的形式自由。詞項壓制義... 

【文章來源】：湖南大學(xué)湖南省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：85 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Introduction
    1.2 The Scope of This Study
    1.3 The Significance of This Study
    1.4 The Organization of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Form-function Mismatch and Its Syntax-semantic Interface
        2.1.1 Some Key Notions Concerned in Form-function Mismatch
        2.1.2 Syntax-semantic Interface Study in Form-function Mismatch
    2.2 Three Accounts to Form-function Mismatch and Their Inadequacies
        2.2.1 Functions and Interpolation of Operators
        2.2.2 Constructional Coercion
        2.2.3 Metaphor and Metonymy
    2.3 A Brief Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
    3.1 A Preamble on Construction Grammar
        3.1.1 Definition of Construction
        3.1.2 The Features of Construction
        3.1.3 The Significance of Construction Grammar
    3.2 Metonymy
        3.2.1 Defining Metonymy
        3.2.2 High-level Metonymy and Low-level Metonymy
    3.3 A Brief Summary
Chapter 4 Semantic Conflict and the Resolution of Form-function Mismatch
    4.1 Grammatical Constructions and Its Relationship to Form-function Mismatch
    4.2 Constructional Bounding and Pragmatic Strengthening in Metonymy
        4.2.1 Constructional Bounding
        4.2.2 Boundedness Shifting and Pragmatic Strengthening in Metonymy
    4.3 Aspectual Constructions and Multi-domain Operations of Metonymy
        4.3.1 Aspectual Constructions and Aspectual Coercion
        4.3.2 Aspectual Shifting and Multi-domain Operations of Metonymy
    4.4 Experiential Event Constructions and Metonymic Coercion
        4.4.1 Experiential Event Constructions and Verbal Argument Flexibility
        4.4.2 Verbal Argument Realization and Metonymic Coercion
    4.5 A Brief Summary
Conclusion
Notes
References
Appendix A:攻讀學(xué)位期間所發(fā)表的學(xué)術(shù)論文
Appendix B:詳細中文摘要
Acknowledgements


【參考文獻】：
期刊論文
[1]界性的靈活性:詞匯、構(gòu)式與概念觀照[J]. 張韌.  外語教學(xué)與研究. 2009(05)
[2]增效構(gòu)式與非增效構(gòu)式——從Goldberg的兩個定義說起[J]. 熊學(xué)亮.  外語教學(xué)與研究. 2009(05)
[3]復(fù)合結(jié)構(gòu)增效現(xiàn)象試析[J]. 熊學(xué)亮.  外語教學(xué)與研究. 2008(05)
[4]語言解釋的維度——以中動構(gòu)式為例[J]. 劉正光.  中國外語. 2008(05)
[5]試論復(fù)合句法標(biāo)記與動詞的語義互動[J]. 熊學(xué)亮.  外語教學(xué). 2008(04)
[6]構(gòu)式語法理論的價值與局限[J]. 陸儉明.  南京師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院學(xué)報. 2008(01)
[7]Metonymy in Grammar[J]. Ronald W.Langacker.  外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報). 2004(06)
[8]管窺語言界面[J]. 熊學(xué)亮.  外語研究. 2004(04)



本文編號：3110813