日常言語(yǔ)交際中,會(huì)話修正現(xiàn)象頗為常見。會(huì)話修正是交際者在言談應(yīng)對(duì)中對(duì)會(huì)話中產(chǎn)生的疑問、誤解和失誤所進(jìn)行的修改更正,最終達(dá)成互解的過程。會(huì)話修正使得交際者共同應(yīng)對(duì)會(huì)話中產(chǎn)生的問題和隔閡,從而保持交流順利有序地進(jìn)行,因此對(duì)于會(huì)話修正的研究是會(huì)話分析研究領(lǐng)域重要的組成部分。會(huì)話分析的研究者們已從不同角度對(duì)會(huì)話修正進(jìn)行研究,比如,會(huì)話修正的路徑、位置、發(fā)起方式、發(fā)起技巧、修正的執(zhí)行手段,以及特殊機(jī)構(gòu)性談話中的會(huì)話修正現(xiàn)象等。但從這些研究會(huì)話修正的文獻(xiàn)中可以看出,沒有研究者具體深入地探究會(huì)話修正產(chǎn)生的動(dòng)力和原因。“知識(shí)論”是近年來會(huì)話分析領(lǐng)域一個(gè)全新的研究方向。‘該理論認(rèn)為知識(shí)論推動(dòng)言談交際的發(fā)展,為會(huì)話分析理論建構(gòu)的完善提供了一種綜觀性的理論視角。知識(shí)狀態(tài)和知識(shí)表達(dá)是知識(shí)論的核心概念。知識(shí)狀態(tài)包括交際者的知識(shí)、知識(shí)獲得的途徑,以及知曉交際對(duì)方在某一知識(shí)域的權(quán)利或地位。知識(shí)狀態(tài)是相對(duì)于知識(shí)域的永恒的社會(huì)性特征。而知識(shí)表達(dá)就是知識(shí)狀態(tài)在言談應(yīng)對(duì)中的具體體現(xiàn)。知識(shí)表達(dá)是交際者在話輪中如何表現(xiàn)自己的知識(shí)狀態(tài)從而定位自己與知識(shí)域的關(guān)系。本研究將從知識(shí)論的角度出發(fā),結(jié)合日常生活自然真實(shí)的語(yǔ)料,分析知識(shí)論在... 

【文章來源】：山西大學(xué)山西省

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：77 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Introduction
    1.2 The Significance of the Study
    1.3 The Rationale of the Study
    1.4 The Objectives of the Study
    1.5 Research Methodology and Data Collection
    1.6 The Organization of the Study
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 The Evolvement of Epistemics
        2.1.1 Epistemics in Cognitive Science
        2.1.2 Epistemics in Sociology
        2.1.3 Epistemics in Linguistics
    2.2 Previous Studies on Epistmics in Conversation Analysis
    2.3 Previous Studies on Repair
CHAPTER THREE THEORIES AND METHODOLOGIES
    3.1 Epistemic Status and Epistemic Stance
    3.2 Epistemics and Action Formation
    3.3 Epistemics and Sequence organization
    3.4 Epistemic Asymmetry in Conversation
        3.4.1 Epistemic access
        3.4.2 Epistemic Primacy
        3.4.3 Epistemic Responsibility
    3.5 Conversational Repair in Epistemics
    3.6 Data Source and Transcription Symbols
CHAPTER FOUR EPISTEMICS AND REPAIR
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 The Epistemic Analysis of Other-initiated Self-repair
        4.2.1 K+ repair-initiation as disagreement
        4.2.2 K- repair-initiation as a lack of knowledge or hearing
    4.3 The Epistemic Analysis of Self-initiated Other-repair
    4.4 The Epistemic Analysis of Other-initiated Other-repair
    4.5 Summary
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications
    5.3 Limitations
    5.4 Suggestions for Further Study
Appendix: IVanscription Conventions
BIBLIOGRAPHY
攻讀學(xué)位期間取得的研究成果
個(gè)人簡(jiǎn)況及聯(lián)系方式
承諾書



本文編號(hào)：3010028