道歉言語行為的研究是在言語行為理論、禮貌原則、面子理論等語用學(xué)理論的發(fā)展進(jìn)程中,是交往規(guī)則和言語行為文化差異的跨文化對比研究中不可忽視的一部分。道歉既是一種普遍而又復(fù)雜的言語現(xiàn)象,又是一種重要的交際活動(dòng),它與陳述、請求、安慰、祝賀、贊美、問候等一樣,都是在人與人之間的交流中以語言為交際手段,用語句作為信息承載的言語行為。這些行為的實(shí)現(xiàn),都可能對聽話人施加某些影響。如果我們只把“道歉”一詞簡單地理解為“對不起”、“請?jiān)彙钡脑?那不免有些狹隘。而最早對道歉語進(jìn)行研究的是Olshtain（沃爾西頓）和Cohen（科恩）,他們將道歉定義為“一種對文化具有敏感性、具有一定的語義成分或策略的言語行為組。”J.Homes （霍姆斯）從功能的角度將道歉定義為“當(dāng)A冒犯了B,道歉可以被用來維護(hù)B的面子,并且彌補(bǔ)冒犯的后果,進(jìn)而恢復(fù)A與B之間的和諧（A是道歉者,B是被冒犯者）。Fraser（弗雷澤）則指出：“只有在兩種基本條件成立時(shí),道歉才有可能發(fā)生。第一,說話者對自己的舉止行為承認(rèn)負(fù)有責(zé)任。第二,由于說話者自己的舉止行為產(chǎn)生了冒犯對方的后果,說話者因此傳遞出某種遺憾的信息�！睂τ诘狼�,一般都有著約定俗... 

【文章來源】：吉林大學(xué)吉林省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：81 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Questions
    1.3 Organization of This Paper
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 The Theoretical Basis
        2.1.1 Politeness Principle and Face Theory Introduction in Western Culture
        2.1.2 Face in Chinese Culture
        2.1.3 The Face Difference Between China and Western World
        2.1.4 The Face Difference in Apology Act and Words
    2.2 Definitions of Apology
    2.3 Overview of "Apology Strategies"
        2.3.1 Different Categories from Different Linguists
        2.3.2 The Apology Strategy Adopted in This Paper
            2.3.2.1 IFID（Illocutionary Force Indicating Device）
            2.3.2.2 Explanation or Account
            2.3.2.3 Taking on Responsibility
            2.3.2.4 Strategy of Offering Repair
            2.3.2.5 Promise of Forbearance
            2.3.2.6 Showing Concern
            2.3.2.7 Minimizing The Degree of Offence
Chapter Three Research Methodology
    3.1 Research Subjects
    3.2 Research Instruments
    3.3 Procedure
    3.4 Data Collection
Chapter Four Results and Analyses
    4.1 A General Description
        4.1.1 IFID（Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices）
        4.1.2 Explanation or Account
        4.1.3 Taking on Responsibility
        4.1.4 Offer of Repair
        4.1.5 Promise of Forbearance
        4.1.6 Showing Concern
        4.1.7 Minimizing the Degree of Offence
    4.2 Discussion of Situations
        4.2.1 Strategy Distribution in Situation 1
        4.2.2 Strategy Distribution in Situation 2
        4.2.3 Strategy Distribution in Situation 3
        4.2.4 Strategy Distribution in Situation 5
        4.2.5 Strategy Distribution in Situation 6
        4.2.6 Strategy Distribution in Situation 9
    4.3 Comparisons
        4.3.1 Similarities
        4.3.2 Differences
Chapter Five Conclusions
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications
        5.2.1 Implications on EFL Teaching
        5.2.2 Implications on EFL Learning
Bibliography
Appendix
Acknowledgements
作者簡介



本文編號(hào)：2977745