【摘要】：近年來，民眾參與政府工作的積極性得到了很大的提高，民眾的聲音也越來越頻繁地出現(xiàn)在了政府工作決策中。2010年5月31日，一年一度的深圳市政府工作報(bào)告問世，同一時(shí)間，南方都市報(bào)也發(fā)表了一篇名為“2010年深圳市政府工作民間報(bào)告”的文章。兩篇報(bào)告結(jié)構(gòu)相同，內(nèi)容方面也有重復(fù)，但卻明顯存在著不同的關(guān)注點(diǎn)。 本研究的語料包括“2010年深圳市政府工作報(bào)告”和“2010年深圳市政府工作民間報(bào)告”。語料來源可靠，分別來自“深圳市政府官方網(wǎng)站”及《南方都市報(bào)》。本研究主要基于批評(píng)性語篇分析中的互文性理論，建立一個(gè)綜合性的分析框架，闡釋并回答了“在共同的話題下，兩篇報(bào)告分別有哪些不同的關(guān)注點(diǎn)”及“這些關(guān)注點(diǎn)是如何通過話語進(jìn)行建構(gòu)的”兩大研究問題，以此揭示話語在社會(huì)生活中的重要作用。 本研究采用的互文性理論主要包括辛斌的具體互文性和體裁互文性兩個(gè)方面；批評(píng)性語篇分析理論主要采用的是Wodak的語篇?dú)v史分析方法。文本分析部分主要包括兩個(gè)方面：詞匯對(duì)比分析和整體結(jié)構(gòu)分析。詞匯對(duì)比分析部分主要從批評(píng)性語篇分析中的“語篇”、“意識(shí)形態(tài)”及“體裁互文性”等角度進(jìn)行分析，展現(xiàn)了兩篇報(bào)告的不同關(guān)注點(diǎn)。整體結(jié)構(gòu)分析部分主要基于Wodak的語篇?dú)v史分析步驟，，探討不同話語策略的運(yùn)用，揭示了兩篇報(bào)告是如何建構(gòu)了不同的關(guān)注點(diǎn)。分析結(jié)果表明：（1）正式的政府工作報(bào)告關(guān)注的是已經(jīng)完成的，更宏觀的問題，而政府工作民間報(bào)告關(guān)注的則是拖建一直未完成，更細(xì)致的問題。（2）政府部門利用其權(quán)力縮小自己工作的不足；民眾則希望借助民間報(bào)告的形式放大自己的聲音，他們各自使用不同的話語策略，從而實(shí)現(xiàn)了對(duì)這些不同關(guān)注點(diǎn)的建構(gòu)。 理論層面上，本研究希望能豐富批評(píng)性語篇分析的相關(guān)研究，并為政府工作報(bào)告的相關(guān)研究提供一個(gè)可行的研究視角；應(yīng)用層面上，希望政府部門能看到該如何才能更好的服務(wù)于人民，從而建立一種和諧民主的社會(huì)關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the enthusiasm of the people to participate in the work of the government has been greatly improved, and the voices of the people have appeared more and more frequently in the decision-making of the government work. On May 31, 2010, the annual work report of the Shenzhen Municipal Government was published. At the same time, the Southern Metropolis Daily also published an article entitled "2010 Shenzhen Municipal Government work Folk report." The structure of the two reports is the same and the content is duplicated, but there are obviously different concerns. The corpus of this study includes the 2010 Shenzhen Municipal Government work report and the 2010 Shenzhen Municipal Government work Folk report. The source of the corpus is reliable, from the official website of Shenzhen Municipal Government and the Southern Metropolis Daily. Based on the intertextuality theory in critical discourse analysis, this study establishes a comprehensive analytical framework, explains and answers "what are the different concerns of the two reports under the common topic" and "how these concerns are constructed through discourse", so as to reveal the important role of discourse in social life. The intertextuality theory used in this study mainly includes two aspects: Xin Bin's specific intertextuality and genre intertextuality, and critical discourse analysis theory mainly adopts Wodak's approach to discourse history analysis. The part of text analysis mainly includes two aspects: lexical contrastive analysis and overall structure analysis. The part of lexical contrastive analysis mainly analyzes "discourse", "ideology" and "genre intertextuality" in critical discourse analysis, and shows the different concerns of the two reports. The whole structure analysis part is mainly based on Wodak's steps of discourse history analysis, discusses the use of different discourse strategies, and reveals how the two reports construct different concerns. The results show that: (1) the formal government work report pays attention to the completed and macroscopical problems, while the government work folk report pays attention to the problem that the procrastination has not been completed and is more detailed. (2) the government departments use their power to reduce the shortage of their work; People want to amplify their voices in the form of folk reports, each using different discourse strategies, thus realizing the construction of these different concerns. On the theoretical level, this study hopes to enrich the relevant research of critical discourse analysis and provide a feasible research perspective for the relevant research of government work reports; at the application level, it is hoped that government departments can see how to better serve the people so as to establish a harmonious and democratic social relationship.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H15

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 辛斌;;互文性:非穩(wěn)定意義和穩(wěn)定意義[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

2 辛斌;語篇互文性的語用分析[J];外語研究;2000年03期

3 田海龍;張邁曾;;話語權(quán)力的不平等關(guān)系:語用學(xué)與社會(huì)學(xué)研究[J];外語學(xué)刊;2006年02期

4 狄艷華;楊忠;;基于語料庫的中國政府工作報(bào)告核心主題詞研究[J];外語學(xué)刊;2010年06期

5 李紅霞;;目的論視域下的政論文英譯策略研究——以2010年《政府工作報(bào)告》為例[J];外國語文;2010年05期

6 田海龍;政治語言研究:評(píng)述與思考[J];外語教學(xué);2002年01期

7 田海龍;;實(shí)踐結(jié)點(diǎn)研究的批評(píng)視角[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2007年03期

8 錢毓芳;田海龍;;話語與中國社會(huì)變遷:以政府工作報(bào)告為例[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2011年03期

9 辛斌;賴彥;;語篇互文性分析的理論與方法[J];當(dāng)代修辭學(xué);2010年03期

10 田海龍!300400;“我”、“我們”的使用與個(gè)人性格[J];語言教學(xué)與研究;2001年04期

本文編號(hào)：2503182