【摘要】：第1章提出本文研究的對象，即同語句式“P是P，Q”。通過收索例句發(fā)現(xiàn)該格式存在古今中外的話語中，但學(xué)界公認(rèn)的對語言解釋力較強的生成語法對這類語句卻束手無策，這表明該句式有其全面研究的必要。該部分提出了研究的目的，從多個維度進行全面分析，以期了解該句式得以形成機制，而且力求對學(xué)界有關(guān)該句式的某些解釋加以修正，對未解決的問題嘗試分析。同時，這部分包括研究綜述、研究意義的具體說明。 第2章對“P是P，Q”的形式和語義進行全面分析。具體為，是前有無副詞、“P是P”的項數(shù)、可納入P位置的詞性分類、多項“P是P”之間的語義關(guān)系、“P是P”與“Q”之間的語義關(guān)系、“P是P”中是的語義再定位，“是”前副詞對同語句的影響等內(nèi)容。在這章筆者對同語句中的是的語義進行了重新定位，指出了同語句中的“是”并非為《現(xiàn)代漢語詞典》、《現(xiàn)代漢語八百詞》等極具有代表性詞典所解釋的連詞表轉(zhuǎn)折，而是表判斷。同時，通過對例句改寫和比較，證明“是”前副詞對同語句的合法性是有制約的，并非可有可無。 第3章研究的著眼點為“P是P，Q”順承式同語句。這類同語句的“P”多為體詞，具體表現(xiàn)為名詞、代詞、數(shù)量詞，其中以名詞居多，使用頻繁，且“是”前多有副詞。本章主要分析點為“P是P”如何與“Q”進行有效銜接及受話者對該類句式的理解機制。這章我們對該類同語句的類別進行了劃分，從“前P”和“后P”具有等值的角度，將其分為兩類。從名詞P的內(nèi)涵意義和可及性角度提出了該類同語句式得以形成和理解的機制。對銜接項“Q”表內(nèi)涵意義和理性意義的兩類句式加以區(qū)別，提出從狹義的角度看，“Q”若表理性意義并非為同語句式。 第4章將“P是P，Q”的轉(zhuǎn)折性同語句置于應(yīng)答句框架內(nèi)進行研究。提出了“P是P”與“Q”之間存在正負相對性，而且提出該類句式符合“引發(fā)—應(yīng)答”模式，具有禮貌的效用。同時，提出關(guān)于該類句式不可忽略的兩個問題，一是正負相對性的認(rèn)知差異，，一是“后P”前置量詞的貶值作用。第二個問題的提出是為了解決學(xué)界關(guān)于同語句中量詞效用的界定問題，結(jié)合全文的分析提出量詞具有貶值作用。 第5章對第1章提出副詞對同語句的合法性制約問題進行分析，通過例句的轉(zhuǎn)換，我們對“是”前副詞句法制約性有了進一步認(rèn)識，在此基礎(chǔ)上我們對副詞的可納入機制及其效用進行了分析，指出某些副詞之所以可納入其中是因為這些副詞與語句的語義相契合，同時指出同語式“是”前副詞為凸顯同語句表達說話人觀點的語法化手段。 最后對全文加以總結(jié)，主要對本文的重點和創(chuàng)新之處加以歸納，同時指出本文未能解決的問題，僅提出筆者的初步認(rèn)識，待另文詳述。
[Abstract]:Chapter 1 puts forward the object of this study, that is, the same sentence pattern "P is P, Q". It is found that the format exists in ancient and modern discourse at home and abroad, but the generative grammar, which is recognized by scholars as having a strong explanatory power in language, is helpless to this kind of sentence, which indicates that the sentence pattern is necessary for a comprehensive study. This part puts forward the purpose of the study, makes a comprehensive analysis from many dimensions, in order to understand the formation mechanism of the sentence pattern, and tries to revise some interpretations of the sentence pattern in academic circles and try to analyze the unresolved problems. At the same time, this part includes the research summary, the research significance concrete explanation. Chapter 2 makes a comprehensive analysis of the form and semantics of "P is P, Q". Specifically, the number of items with or without adverbs, "P is P" can be included in the part-of-speech classification of P position, the semantic relationship between multiple terms "P is P", and the semantic relationship between "P is P" and "Q". The semantic repositioning of "P is P" and the influence of the adverbs before "P" on the same sentence. In this chapter, the author repositions the semantics of yes in the same sentence, and points out that the "yes" in the same sentence is not a turning point in the conjunction list explained by the most representative dictionaries, such as "Modern Chinese Dictionary" and "800 words in Modern Chinese". It's a watch of judgment. At the same time, through the rewriting and comparison of the example sentence, it is proved that the adverb before "is" restricts the legitimacy of the same sentence, and is not optional. In chapter 3, the focus of the study is "P is P, Q". Most of the "P" of this kind of sentence are aspect words, which are embodied in nouns, pronouns and quantitative words, most of which are nouns and frequently used, and there are adverbs before "yes". This chapter mainly analyzes how "P is P" and "Q" effectively connect with "Q" and the understanding mechanism of this kind of sentence pattern. In this chapter, we divide the categories of similar statements into two categories from the point of view of the equivalence of "front P" and "post P". From the point of view of the connotation, meaning and accessibility of noun P, this paper puts forward the mechanism of forming and understanding this kind of sentence pattern. This paper distinguishes the two kinds of sentence patterns of connotation meaning and rational meaning of "Q" table, and puts forward that "Q" if the rational meaning is not the same sentence pattern from a narrow sense point of view. In chapter 4, the turning point sentence of "P is P, Q" is studied in the framework of response sentence. It is proposed that there is a positive and negative relativity between "P is P" and "Q", and it is proposed that this kind of sentence pattern accords with the "trigger-response" model and has polite utility. At the same time, two problems about this kind of sentence pattern can not be ignored, one is the cognitive difference of positive and negative relativity, the other is the devaluation of "post P" antecedent. The second problem is to solve the problem of defining the utility of classifiers in the same sentence in order to solve the problem of defining the utility of classifiers in the same sentence. Combined with the analysis of the full text, it is proposed that classifiers have the function of devaluation. Chapter 5 analyzes the legitimacy restriction of adverbs to the same sentence in chapter 1, and through the transformation of example sentences, we have a further understanding of the legal nature of adverbs before "yes". On this basis, we analyze the inclusive mechanism and utility of adverbs, and point out that some adverbs can be included because these adverbs coincide with the semantics of sentences. At the same time, it is pointed out that the antecedent adverb is a grammaticalization means to highlight the same sentence to express the speaker's point of view. Finally, this paper summarizes the full text, mainly summarizes the focus and innovation of this paper, and points out the problems that can not be solved in this paper, only puts forward the author's preliminary understanding, to be detailed in the other article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H146.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳蕾;張文峰;;同義反復(fù)類典型構(gòu)式的轉(zhuǎn)喻理據(jù)[J];滁州職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年04期

2 董秀芳;“是”的進一步語法化:由虛詞到詞內(nèi)成分[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);2004年01期

3 楊艷;“A是A”格式的表達特點[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

4 石

本文編號：2490421