發(fā)布時間：2019-05-17 08:13

【摘要】：漢語會話沖突造成說話人和聽話人交流受阻，是一種常見的語言現(xiàn)象。它不同于話語沖突或沖突話語，主要通過語音、語法、語義、語用以及修辭等途徑表現(xiàn)出來，具有語境依賴性、動態(tài)性和意圖違背性的特點。針對這一語言現(xiàn)象，運用描寫、歸納的方法考察語境因素、預(yù)設(shè)因素和關(guān)聯(lián)因素如何消解會話沖突。這三種消解方法互不相同：語境中的背景語境和場景語境符合會話沖突動態(tài)性的特點，具有限制和選擇信息的功能；預(yù)設(shè)消解通過話語中出現(xiàn)的新預(yù)設(shè)調(diào)節(jié)和約束語言信息；而關(guān)聯(lián)中的架橋理論使得聽話人運用邏輯知識推導(dǎo)出話語間的缺損項，挖掘出說話人的話語含義，消除疑慮。同時三種方法也具有內(nèi)在的聯(lián)系性。由于引起漢語會話沖突的原因眾多，其消解方法不能局限于幾種，其他的方法將會在以后繼續(xù)探討。研究漢語會話沖突的消解機制能夠為探索相關(guān)語言現(xiàn)象提供依據(jù)，，有助于交際參與者交換話語信息，促成交際順利完成。
[Abstract]:It is a common language phenomenon that the communication between the speaker and the hearer is blocked by the conflict of Chinese conversation. It is different from discourse conflict or conflict discourse, mainly through phonetics, grammar, semantics, pragmatics and rhetoric, and has the characteristics of context dependence, dynamics and intention violation. In view of this linguistic phenomenon, this paper uses the method of description and induction to investigate how contextual factors, presupposition factors and related factors resolve the conversation conflict. The three resolution methods are different: the background context and the scene context in the context accord with the dynamic characteristics of the conversation conflict and have the function of restricting and selecting the information, and the presupposition resolution adjusts and restricts the language information through the new presupposition in the discourse, and the background context and the scene context in the context accord with the dynamic characteristics of the conversation conflict. The bridge-building theory in relevance makes the hearer use logical knowledge to deduce the defects between utterances, excavate the meaning of the speaker's discourse, and eliminate the doubts. At the same time, the three methods also have inherent connection. Due to the many causes of Chinese conversation conflict, its resolution methods can not be limited to a few, other methods will continue to be discussed in the future. The study of the resolution mechanism of Chinese conversation conflict can provide the basis for exploring the related language phenomena, help the communicative participants to exchange discourse information, and promote the smooth completion of communication.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：渤海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H136

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周彥軍;何春霞;;小說沖突話語分析[J];長沙大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年03期

2 陳忠華;韓紅;;話語的語境性[J];解放軍外語學(xué)院學(xué)報;1997年01期

3 文旭;中國語用學(xué)20年[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;1999年04期

4 束定芳;;關(guān)于預(yù)設(shè)理論的幾個問題[J];外語研究;1989年03期

5 藍純;認知語言學(xué):背景與現(xiàn)狀[J];外語研究;2001年03期

6 李錫胤;對于預(yù)設(shè)與推涵的思考[J];外語學(xué)刊(黑龍江大學(xué)學(xué)報);1990年03期

7 徐盛桓;“預(yù)設(shè)”新論[J];外語學(xué)刊(黑龍江大學(xué)學(xué)報);1993年01期

8 趙英玲;沖突話語分析[J];外語學(xué)刊;2004年05期

9 萬斌;王滿榮;;論沖突與和諧[J];求索;2006年08期

10 徐家禎;;淺論“前提”及影響“前提”的因素[J];邏輯與語言學(xué)習(xí);1986年01期

本文編號：2478935