發(fā)布時間：2018-11-13 09:11

【摘要】：批評話語分析(簡稱CDA)出現(xiàn)于20世紀(jì)70年代,其主要的研究目的是分析和探討特定話語的語言特點及其政治、文化背景進行批評性,揭示出新聞?wù)Z篇報道背后所隱藏的意識形態(tài)和權(quán)利關(guān)系,以證實新聞?wù)Z篇的主觀性和傾向性,進一步的挖掘新聞記者的寫作意圖和其代表政治利益集團的觀點和立場。本文以《中國日報》和《華盛頓郵報》中對2014年香港占中事件的相關(guān)報道為語料,以韓禮德的系統(tǒng)功能語法和費爾克拉夫的三維分析模式為理論框架,進行了批評性分析,探討中美兩國的新聞記者是如何運用語言來隱藏意識形態(tài)意義,并闡述新聞?wù)Z篇背后所暗含的意識形態(tài)意義和權(quán)力關(guān)系。通過對所收集的新聞?wù)Z料的分析,本文得出了以下的結(jié)論：表面上看似客觀公正的新聞報道隱晦地表達(dá)了其政治利益集團所代表的意識形態(tài)傾向和權(quán)力關(guān)系。所得出的結(jié)果體現(xiàn)出：1、新聞記者使用不同的詞匯來表達(dá)對特定政治事件的觀點；2、在情態(tài)系統(tǒng)的使用方面,新聞記者通過巧妙地變換時態(tài),并且通過直接和間接轉(zhuǎn)述引語來表達(dá)或者強調(diào)對相關(guān)新聞報道的態(tài)度,以及他們所代表的權(quán)力集團的立場；3、通過中方和美方報道的對比,美方的新聞記者更頻繁地使用分析方式中名詞化詞語和被動語態(tài)兩種系統(tǒng)方式,并且對語料進行一定地刪除、用詞的替換、語意的重新排列,以表達(dá)了他們所代表的權(quán)力集團的觀點。因此,在對政治新聞的分析領(lǐng)域,從批評性話語分析的視角來看,新聞記者隱含在各大政治事件的新聞報道背后的寫作意圖及權(quán)利傾向?qū)⒕哂幸欢ǖ默F(xiàn)實意義,運用對比分析的方法,我們不僅可以更透徹地理解并闡釋語篇,而且也能夠揭示話語、意識形態(tài)和權(quán)力之間的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Critical discourse Analysis (CDA) appeared in the 1970s. Its main purpose is to analyze and explore the linguistic characteristics and political and cultural background of a particular discourse. In order to prove the subjectivity and tendency of news discourse, the author reveals the hidden relationship between ideology and power behind the news discourse, and further excavates the writing intention of journalists and the viewpoints and stands of political interest groups. Based on the reports on the Hong Kong occupation of China in 2014 in China Daily and the Washington Post, this paper makes a critical analysis on Halliday's systemic functional grammar and Felke's three-dimensional analytical model. This paper discusses how journalists in China and the United States use language to hide the ideological meaning, and expounds the ideological meaning and power relationship behind the news discourse. Based on the analysis of the collected news corpus, this paper draws the following conclusions: the seemingly objective and impartial news reports implicitly express the ideological tendency and power relationship represented by their political interest groups. The results show that: 1, journalists use different words to express their views on specific political events; (2) in the use of modality system, journalists express or emphasize their attitude towards relevant news reports by skillfully changing tenses, and by directly and indirectly reporting quotations, as well as the positions of the power groups they represent; 3. Through the comparison of Chinese and American reports, American journalists used more frequently the two systematic methods of nominalization and passive voice in the analysis method, and carried out certain deletion of the corpus, replacement of the words, and rearrangement of the meaning. To express the views of the power groups they represent. Therefore, in the field of analysis of political news, from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, the writing intention and right tendency of journalists hidden behind the news reports of major political events will have certain practical significance. By means of contrastive analysis, we can not only understand and interpret discourse more thoroughly, but also reveal the relationship among discourse, ideology and power.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H15;H315

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 辛斌;新聞?wù)Z篇轉(zhuǎn)述引語的批評性分析[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;1998年02期

，

本文編號：2328656