發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-09 09:59

【摘要】：弗雷格在自己的語(yǔ)言哲學(xué)體系里提出了著名的"涵義"理論,并將這樣的"涵義"解釋為指稱(chēng)對(duì)象的"給定方式";"給定方式"存在于語(yǔ)言或數(shù)學(xué)表達(dá)之中,只有通過(guò)這樣的"給定方式",聯(lián)系同一對(duì)象的不同信息和認(rèn)知模式才得以呈現(xiàn);然而,囿于"經(jīng)驗(yàn)實(shí)在論"的限制,弗雷格將自己的"涵義"及其"給定方式"放置在了一個(gè)非理性的語(yǔ)言符號(hào)世界之中,從而導(dǎo)致了弗雷格"涵義"因"實(shí)在論"需要而失去其真實(shí)"位置"的結(jié)果。文章基于相關(guān)理論的分析,旨在確立弗雷格"涵義"及其"給定方式"的位置與主體,探討"涵義"及其"給定方式"的理性回歸之路。
[Abstract]:Frege put forward the famous theory of "meaning" in his philosophical system of language, and interpreted such "meaning" as the "given way" of the reference object; "given way" exists in language or mathematical expression. It is only through such a "given way" that different information and cognitive models that relate to the same object can be presented; however, due to the limitations of "empirical realism", Frege placed his "meaning" and his "given way" in an irrational world of linguistic symbols, which led to the loss of Frege's "meaning" because of the need of "realism". Based on the analysis of relevant theories, this paper aims to establish the position and subject of Frege's "meaning" and its "given way", and to explore the rational return of "meaning" and "given way".
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué)外語(yǔ)學(xué)院;西華大學(xué)外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H0-05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張慶熊;弗雷格的邏輯和數(shù)學(xué)思想的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年01期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 熊嶺;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)指稱(chēng)范疇研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 史t，

本文編號(hào)：2232056