明代史料筆記訓詁研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-07 06:26
【摘要】：筆記是我國古代文學中一種重要的文學體裁，屬于與韻文相對應(yīng)的散文范疇。筆記萌芽于漢代，魏晉時期得到飛速發(fā)展，到明代，筆記的數(shù)量、種類都有了很大提高。清乾隆時期修《四庫全書》，大量明代野史遭到銷毀，但存留下來的明代史料筆記數(shù)量依舊豐富，涉及內(nèi)容也相當廣泛，包括朝野掌故、典章制度、逸聞瑣事、社會風俗、山川地理等方面，具有較高的史料價值和語言學價值。 筆記雖都是作者的零散隨筆和雜錄，但其中也包含著豐富的訓詁內(nèi)容。前人對筆記的研究主要集中于歷史價值和詞匯考釋方面，忽視了其訓詁價值。本文選取了二十一部明代史料筆記作為研究對象，，對其訓詁材料進行整理分析，在此基礎(chǔ)上總結(jié)出其訓詁內(nèi)容和訓詁方法、特點，并將其中的詞語訓詁和《漢語大詞典》詞語訓釋進行對比分析，對《漢語大詞典》相關(guān)詞條進行補正。 全文共分為五部分： 緒論部分對筆記進行概述，介紹了筆記的定義、內(nèi)容、特點等。分析了明代史料筆記的獨特研究價值，并廣泛搜集相關(guān)材料，概述出明代史料筆記的研究現(xiàn)狀。 第一章為“明代史料筆記中的訓詁內(nèi)容”，分別從考釋詞語、考辨讀音、辨正文字、分析句讀和串講文意五個方面對明代史料筆記訓詁內(nèi)容進行分析。 第二章為“明代史料筆記的訓詁方法和特點”，從求義方法和釋義方法兩方面對明代史料筆記的訓詁方法進行分析，并總結(jié)出明代史料筆記的訓詁特點，共有三點：一是訓詁術(shù)語種類繁多，訓詁語言通俗易懂；二是訓詁內(nèi)容分布不平衡，重詞語訓詁；三是訓詁形式多集中訓釋，并間有文中自注。 第三章為“明代史料筆記對《漢語大詞典》的補正”，將史料筆記中的詞語訓詁條與《漢語大詞典》進行對比分析，對《漢語大詞典》存在的詞條失收、義項缺失、引證嫌遲、書證不足問題進行了補正，彰顯明代史料筆記訓詁對辭書編纂的意義和價值。經(jīng)過整理統(tǒng)計，詞條失收共有152條，義項缺失47條，引證嫌遲25條，書證不足26條。 結(jié)語部分進一步總結(jié)全文，再一次強調(diào)了明代史料筆記訓詁的研究價值所在。 筆記作為我國古代重要的文學形式，研究價值不可忽視。明代史料筆記不論從數(shù)量上還是內(nèi)容上都非常豐富，希望通過本文的研究，使學術(shù)界認識到明代史料筆記的訓詁價值，對史料筆記進行更為深入地研究，從而進一步挖掘史料筆記的學術(shù)價值和意義。
[Abstract]:Note-taking is an important literary genre in ancient Chinese literature and belongs to prose category corresponding to verse. Notes germinated in the Han Dynasty and developed rapidly in the Wei and Jin dynasties. By the Ming Dynasty, the number and types of notes had been greatly improved. During the Qianlong period of the Qing Dynasty, Siku Quan Shu was revised. A large number of Ming Dynasty wild history was destroyed, but the number of Ming Dynasty historical notes that remained was still abundant and involved in a wide range of contents, including court and opposition stories, rules and regulations, anecdotes and trifles, and social customs. The geography of mountains and rivers has high historical value and linguistic value. Although the notes are scattered essays and miscellaneous notes, they also contain rich exegesis. Previous researches on notes mainly focus on historical value and lexical interpretation, neglecting their exegesis value. In this paper, 21 historical notes of Ming Dynasty are selected as the research object, and their exegetical materials are sorted out and analyzed. On this basis, the contents and methods of exegesis are summarized. A comparative analysis is made between the exegesis of the words and the explanation of the words in the Chinese Dictionary, and the relevant entries in the Chinese Dictionary are corrected. The full text is divided into five parts: introduction to the introduction of notes, introduced the definition, content, characteristics and so on. This paper analyzes on the unique research value of historical notes of Ming Dynasty, collects relevant materials extensively, and summarizes the research status of historical notes of Ming Dynasty. The first chapter is "the exegesis content in the historical materials notes of Ming Dynasty", which analyzes the exegetical contents of the historical data notes of the Ming Dynasty from five aspects of textual research, pronunciation, correction, sentence reading and literal meaning. The second chapter is "the exegetical method and characteristic of the historical data notes of Ming Dynasty". It analyzes the exegetical methods of the historical data notes of the Ming Dynasty from the two aspects of the method of seeking meaning and the method of interpretation, and sums up the characteristics of the exegesis of the notes of historical materials of the Ming Dynasty. There are three points: one is the variety of exegesis terms, the exegesis language is easy to understand; the second is that the content of exegesis is unbalanced, the word exegesis is emphasized; the third is that the form of exegetical exegetics is more concentrated on exegesis, and there are some notes in the text. The third chapter is "the complement and correction of the Chinese Dictionary of the Historical Notes of the Ming Dynasty". The article compares and analyzes the words exegesis in the historical data notes and the Chinese Dictionary, and makes a comparative analysis of the missing entries, missing meanings and late citations of the entries in the Chinese Dictionary. The problem of insufficient documentary evidence is corrected to show the significance and value of the historical materials and exegesis of the Ming Dynasty in the compilation of dictionaries. According to the statistics, there are 152 missing entries, 47 missing meanings, 25 late citations and 26 documents. The conclusion part further summarizes the full text, and emphasizes once again the research value of the historical material notes exegetics in Ming Dynasty. As an important literary form in ancient China, the research value can not be ignored. The historical notes of Ming Dynasty are very rich in both quantity and content. It is hoped that through the study of this paper, the academic circles will realize the value of the exegesis of the notes of historical materials in Ming Dynasty, and make a more in-depth study on the notes of historical materials. In order to further explore the academic value and significance of historical notes.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H134
本文編號：2169171
[Abstract]:Note-taking is an important literary genre in ancient Chinese literature and belongs to prose category corresponding to verse. Notes germinated in the Han Dynasty and developed rapidly in the Wei and Jin dynasties. By the Ming Dynasty, the number and types of notes had been greatly improved. During the Qianlong period of the Qing Dynasty, Siku Quan Shu was revised. A large number of Ming Dynasty wild history was destroyed, but the number of Ming Dynasty historical notes that remained was still abundant and involved in a wide range of contents, including court and opposition stories, rules and regulations, anecdotes and trifles, and social customs. The geography of mountains and rivers has high historical value and linguistic value. Although the notes are scattered essays and miscellaneous notes, they also contain rich exegesis. Previous researches on notes mainly focus on historical value and lexical interpretation, neglecting their exegesis value. In this paper, 21 historical notes of Ming Dynasty are selected as the research object, and their exegetical materials are sorted out and analyzed. On this basis, the contents and methods of exegesis are summarized. A comparative analysis is made between the exegesis of the words and the explanation of the words in the Chinese Dictionary, and the relevant entries in the Chinese Dictionary are corrected. The full text is divided into five parts: introduction to the introduction of notes, introduced the definition, content, characteristics and so on. This paper analyzes on the unique research value of historical notes of Ming Dynasty, collects relevant materials extensively, and summarizes the research status of historical notes of Ming Dynasty. The first chapter is "the exegesis content in the historical materials notes of Ming Dynasty", which analyzes the exegetical contents of the historical data notes of the Ming Dynasty from five aspects of textual research, pronunciation, correction, sentence reading and literal meaning. The second chapter is "the exegetical method and characteristic of the historical data notes of Ming Dynasty". It analyzes the exegetical methods of the historical data notes of the Ming Dynasty from the two aspects of the method of seeking meaning and the method of interpretation, and sums up the characteristics of the exegesis of the notes of historical materials of the Ming Dynasty. There are three points: one is the variety of exegesis terms, the exegesis language is easy to understand; the second is that the content of exegesis is unbalanced, the word exegesis is emphasized; the third is that the form of exegetical exegetics is more concentrated on exegesis, and there are some notes in the text. The third chapter is "the complement and correction of the Chinese Dictionary of the Historical Notes of the Ming Dynasty". The article compares and analyzes the words exegesis in the historical data notes and the Chinese Dictionary, and makes a comparative analysis of the missing entries, missing meanings and late citations of the entries in the Chinese Dictionary. The problem of insufficient documentary evidence is corrected to show the significance and value of the historical materials and exegesis of the Ming Dynasty in the compilation of dictionaries. According to the statistics, there are 152 missing entries, 47 missing meanings, 25 late citations and 26 documents. The conclusion part further summarizes the full text, and emphasizes once again the research value of the historical material notes exegetics in Ming Dynasty. As an important literary form in ancient China, the research value can not be ignored. The historical notes of Ming Dynasty are very rich in both quantity and content. It is hoped that through the study of this paper, the academic circles will realize the value of the exegesis of the notes of historical materials in Ming Dynasty, and make a more in-depth study on the notes of historical materials. In order to further explore the academic value and significance of historical notes.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H134
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張?zhí)?沙愛敏;;從訓詁的角度看《聊齋志異》詞語的訓釋[J];蒲松齡研究;2006年04期
2 唐七元;;試談《菽園雜記》的方言學價值[J];西華大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年04期
3 滕新才;《客座贅語》標點瑕疵錄[J];古籍整理研究學刊;1996年02期
4 李漢麗;;《漢語大詞典》書證前補[J];淮北煤炭師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年06期
5 黎千駒;;論《日知錄》的訓詁成就與學術(shù)貢獻[J];湖北師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年03期
6 孟順方;周寶銀;;葉權(quán)《賢博編》的史料價值[J];晉中學院學報;2008年06期
7 徐波;《客座贅語》語言文字史料評析[J];江蘇教育學院學報(社會科學版);2003年05期
8 刑永革;《菽園雜記》中的語言學史料評述[J];江西社會科學;2002年08期
9 李漢麗;;《漢語大詞典》書證前補(二)[J];隴東學院學報;2009年04期
10 吳道良;陸容《菽園雜記》的史料價值[J];南都學壇;2003年03期
相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條
1 楊繼光;《萬歷野獲編》詞匯研究[D];廈門大學;2007年
本文編號：2169171
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2169171.html
