本文選題：領(lǐng)主屬賓句 + 句法推導(dǎo)��； 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：領(lǐng)主屬賓句是漢語中極具爭議性的一個(gè)句型,從上個(gè)世紀(jì)50年代開始就受到學(xué)者們的廣泛關(guān)注,但受限于當(dāng)時(shí)的環(huán)境及傳統(tǒng)語法的自身局限,對于這一句型的研究尚不徹底,許多問題沒有得到解決。從90年代開始,這一問題再度引起了學(xué)者們的關(guān)注。截至目前為止,對于句首領(lǐng)有名詞的解釋主要有兩種：第一種是移位說(Xu,1999; Han,2000; WenChen,2001),第二種是基礎(chǔ)生成說(Zhu,2005, PanHan,2005)。第一種說法認(rèn)為,領(lǐng)有名詞是從隸屬名詞的定語位置移至句子的最前端,第二種說法認(rèn)為領(lǐng)有名詞是基礎(chǔ)生成于句首位置,而非移位。 對于領(lǐng)主屬賓句的研究目前學(xué)者們?nèi)杂性S多問題未達(dá)成一致意見,例如：表示名詞所有格的“的”字問題,究竟是在領(lǐng)有名詞提升的過程中被刪除,還是“隱現(xiàn)”?隸屬名詞到底帶的是什么格,是部分格、主格,還是賓格?領(lǐng)有名詞是充當(dāng)主語還是話題?這些問題,都是學(xué)者們反復(fù)爭論,卻又沒有得出最終一致方案的。 因此,本文試圖以喬姆斯基最新提出的語段理論(Phase Theory)為理論框架,對領(lǐng)主屬賓句進(jìn)行研究。語段理論是對Minimalist Inquiries (MI)的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展與闡釋。Chomsky提出語段理論是為了強(qiáng)調(diào)語言研究的生物學(xué)屬性。在語段理論中,句法運(yùn)算是按照語段進(jìn)行的(phase by phase)。一個(gè)語段推導(dǎo)完成后,這個(gè)語段的語域就要被提交,不能參與接下來的句法運(yùn)算,這就是語段不可穿透性條件(phase impenetrability condition,簡稱PIC)。 本文第一章將介紹理論框架,包括題元理論、格理論、語段理論及CP分裂假設(shè)。其中語段理論為本章的重點(diǎn),包括語段的定義,其框架內(nèi)的特征賦值與探針-目標(biāo)關(guān)系,語段理論中最重要的語段不可穿透性條件(phase impenetrability condition/PIC)。第二章將介紹領(lǐng)主屬賓句,包括其定義、語法特征及其特殊性,并對國內(nèi)外學(xué)者對這一特殊句式的研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行綜述。第三章中是本文對領(lǐng)主屬賓句的分析。首先,本文分析了目前學(xué)者們對領(lǐng)主屬賓句的研究方法,并指出了其中所存在的問題；然后,本文基于Chomsky最新提出的語段理論對這一特殊句型的句法推導(dǎo)進(jìn)行研究。本文認(rèn)為,領(lǐng)有名詞基礎(chǔ)生成于話題的標(biāo)志語位置。由于領(lǐng)主屬賓句中的動(dòng)詞為非賓格動(dòng)詞,形成的VP不能構(gòu)成語段,因此隸屬名詞與T通過遠(yuǎn)距離一致被T賦予主格。最后,本文指出了這種新的分析方法的優(yōu)點(diǎn)。由于作者水平有限,本文有一定的局限性,即本文只分析了現(xiàn)代漢語中的領(lǐng)主屬賓句,而沒有考慮跨語言的差異,因此,相關(guān)問題需要得到更深入的研究。
[Abstract]:As a controversial sentence pattern in Chinese, the Lords' belonging to the object sentence has been widely concerned by scholars since the 1950s, but limited by the environment and the limitations of the traditional grammar, the study of this sentence pattern is not complete. Many problems have not been solved. Since the 1990 s, this problem has once again attracted the attention of scholars. Up to now, there are two main explanations for the noun of the head of sentence: the first is the shift theory (Xuang 1999; Hanzi 2000; Wen Chenwei 2001), and the second is the basic generation theory (Zhuan 2005, Pan Han 2005). The first is that the noun is transferred from the attributive position of the subordinate noun to the front of the sentence, and the second is that the noun is based on the first position of the sentence, not on the shift. There are still many problems on which scholars have not reached an agreement. For example, is the question of "the word" that indicates the noun possessive is deleted in the process of noun promotion, or is it "hidden"? What case is the subordinate noun, part of the case, subjective case, or object case? Does a noun serve as a subject or a topic? These problems, scholars have repeatedly argued, but did not arrive at a final agreement. Therefore, this paper attempts to use Chomsky's latest phase theory as the theoretical framework to study the Lords' subordinate object sentence. Segment Theory is a further development and interpretation of Minimalist inquiries (MI). Chomsky puts forward the Segment Theory to emphasize the biological properties of language research. In segmental theory, syntactic operation is a (phase by phase). That is carried out according to a segment. After the derivation of a segment, the register of the segment is submitted and cannot participate in the following syntactic operation. In the first chapter, we introduce the theoretical framework, including the theory of metafunctions, case theory, segment theory and CP splitting hypothesis. Segment theory is the focus of this chapter, including the definition of segment, the relationship between feature assignment and probe target in its framework, and the most important nonpenetrating condition of segment (phase impenetrability condition / PIC). In the second chapter, the author introduces the definition, grammatical features and particularity of the sentence, and summarizes the research status of this particular sentence at home and abroad. The third chapter is the analysis of the lord-object sentence in this paper. First of all, this paper analyzes the current research methods and points out the existing problems, and then, based on Chomsky's latest segment theory, studies the syntactic derivation of this particular sentence pattern. This paper holds that the noun is based on the position of the marker of the topic. Since the verb in the Lords' object sentence is a non-objective verb, the VP formed can not form a segment, so the subordinate noun and T are endowed with the subject case by T through a long distance. Finally, this paper points out the advantages of this new analytical method. Due to the limited level of the author, this paper has some limitations, that is, this paper only analyzes the Lords' genus and object sentences in modern Chinese, and does not consider the cross-linguistic differences. Therefore, the related problems need to be further studied.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 徐杰;兩種保留賓語句式及相關(guān)句法理論問題[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);1999年01期

2 徐杰;;領(lǐng)有名詞的提升移位與多項(xiàng)名詞性結(jié)構(gòu)的切分方向[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);2008年03期

3 戴曼純;;最簡方案框架下的句法新理論[J];外國語言文學(xué);2007年02期

4 任鷹;;“領(lǐng)屬”與“存現(xiàn)”:從概念的關(guān)聯(lián)到構(gòu)式的關(guān)聯(lián)——也從“王冕死了父親”的生成方式說起[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2009年03期

5 胡建華;;題元、論元和語法功能項(xiàng)——格標(biāo)效應(yīng)與語言差異[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2007年03期

6 韓景泉;領(lǐng)有名詞提升移位與格理論[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2000年03期

7 溫賓利,陳宗利;領(lǐng)有名詞移位:基于MP的分析[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2001年04期

8 朱行帆;輕動(dòng)詞和漢語不及物動(dòng)詞帶賓語現(xiàn)象[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2005年03期

，

本文編號：2073523