本文選題：南海爭(zhēng)端 + 批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析��； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：語(yǔ)言不僅是人們交流的工具,也是社會(huì)意識(shí)形態(tài)的反映。批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析(CDA)研究語(yǔ)言、權(quán)力及意識(shí)形態(tài)的共生關(guān)系,其旨在揭示語(yǔ)篇中含而不露的意識(shí)形態(tài),并解釋其生成過(guò)程以及存在的社會(huì)條件。但隨著研究的深入,主流批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析因?yàn)槿鄙倭藢?duì)認(rèn)知因素的探討而受到廣泛批評(píng),因而近年來(lái),越來(lái)越多的認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的研究成果如隱喻、轉(zhuǎn)喻、范疇化也逐漸應(yīng)用到批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析中。然而,作為認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)一部分的框架理論和批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析結(jié)合的很少。但通過(guò)對(duì)框架理論的分析,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)其中的一些重要觀點(diǎn)對(duì)批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析有重要啟示,可以成為批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的重要工具。本文將以框架理論為視角,運(yùn)用框架理論中的基本概念和觀點(diǎn)從詞匯、句子、篇章的層面對(duì)新聞?wù)Z篇進(jìn)行批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析,探討框架理論如何為批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析提供新的視角和思路,以及實(shí)現(xiàn)在認(rèn)知層面對(duì)意識(shí)形態(tài)更全面的分析。2014年5月,中國(guó)在南海進(jìn)行正常石油鉆塔操作時(shí),遭到了越南的無(wú)端阻止,越方不但在海上多次派船騷擾中國(guó)石油鉆塔,并且在國(guó)內(nèi)發(fā)起了反華暴亂,給中國(guó)造成嚴(yán)重的人員傷亡和財(cái)產(chǎn)損失。國(guó)內(nèi)外各大媒體也競(jìng)相對(duì)此事進(jìn)行報(bào)道。以此為背景,本文以框架理論為視角,對(duì)中美兩大知名媒體China Daily和CNN中關(guān)于此次南海爭(zhēng)端的二十八篇新聞報(bào)道進(jìn)行批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析。本文的研究成果有:第一,新聞并不總是客觀的,CNN和China Daily在同一事件的報(bào)道中存在很多差異。第二,框架理論可以作為批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的有效工具。框架理論中的觀點(diǎn)可以為批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析在詞匯、句子、語(yǔ)篇方面提供啟示。第三,通過(guò)運(yùn)用框架理論進(jìn)行批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)CNN和China Daily傳遞了不同的意識(shí)形態(tài)。CNN將中國(guó)視為威脅者,并將所有緊張和麻煩歸咎中國(guó)。而China Daily認(rèn)為越南才應(yīng)該為一且后果負(fù)責(zé),并不斷強(qiáng)調(diào)對(duì)南海的主權(quán),堅(jiān)決反對(duì)任何侵犯主權(quán)或干涉主權(quán)的行為。第四,新聞中凸顯的不同框架以及傳遞的不同意識(shí)形態(tài)與其社會(huì)背景緊密相關(guān)。本文理論意義在于彌補(bǔ)了批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的不足,現(xiàn)實(shí)意義在于通過(guò)對(duì)新聞?wù)Z篇進(jìn)行批評(píng)分析,有利于幫助人們更好地認(rèn)識(shí)新聞背后隱藏的意識(shí)形態(tài),并增強(qiáng)讀者的批評(píng)性閱讀意識(shí)以及提高讀者批評(píng)性閱讀能力,今后更加全面地看待新聞報(bào)道。
[Abstract]:Language is not only a tool for people to communicate, but also a reflection of social ideology. Critical discourse Analysis (CDA) studies the symbiotic relationship among language, power and ideology, which aims to reveal the hidden ideology in the discourse and to explain the process of its formation and the social conditions of its existence. However, with the deepening of the research, the mainstream critical discourse analysis has been widely criticized for its lack of discussion of cognitive factors. Therefore, in recent years, more and more researches on cognitive linguistics, such as metaphor and metonymy, have been carried out. Categorization is also gradually applied to critical discourse analysis. However, the combination of framework theory and critical discourse analysis as part of cognitive linguistics is rare. However, through the analysis of the framework theory, we can find that some of the important viewpoints have important implications for critical discourse analysis and can become an important tool for critical discourse analysis. From the perspective of frame theory, this paper analyzes the critical discourse of news discourse from the lexical, sentence and textual levels using the basic concepts and viewpoints of frame theory. To explore how the framework theory can provide a new perspective and train of thought for critical discourse analysis, and to achieve a more comprehensive analysis of ideology at the cognitive level. In May 2014, China conducted a normal oil rig operation in the South China Sea. Vietnam has not only sent ships to harass Chinese oil rigs many times, but also launched anti-China riots at home, causing serious casualties and property losses to China. Major media at home and abroad are also competing to cover the matter. Against this background, this paper makes a critical discourse analysis of 28 news reports on the South China Sea dispute in China Daily and CNN, two well-known media in China and the United States from the perspective of frame theory. The main results of this paper are as follows: first, news is not always objective. There are many differences between CNN and China Daily in reporting the same event. Second, framework theory can be used as an effective tool for critical discourse analysis. The view of frame theory can provide inspiration for critical discourse analysis in terms of vocabulary, sentence and discourse. Thirdly, by using framework theory to analyze critical discourse, it is found that CNN and China Daily transmit different ideologies. CNN regards China as a threat, and blames China for all its nervousness and trouble. China Daily blamed Vietnam for the consequences and insisted on sovereignty over the South China Sea, firmly opposed to any encroachment on or interference with sovereignty. Fourth, the different frames and different ideologies in news are closely related to their social background. The theoretical significance of this paper is to make up for the deficiency of critical discourse analysis, and the practical significance lies in the fact that through the critical analysis of news discourse, it is helpful to help people better understand the hidden ideology behind the news. And enhance readers' critical reading awareness and improve critical reading ability, and view news reports more comprehensively in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：H15;H315

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林敏;;框架理論對(duì)批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的啟示[J];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

2 屈春芳;;奧巴馬就職演說(shuō)的“好朋友”框架研究及其語(yǔ)言教學(xué)啟示[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2010年03期

3 周紅英;;批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)方法[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

4 陳忠平;白解紅;;Fillmore框架語(yǔ)義學(xué)認(rèn)知觀闡釋[J];當(dāng)代外語(yǔ)研究;2012年07期

5 郜麗娜;;認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)理論在批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析中的應(yīng)用[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

6 張輝;江龍;;試論認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)與批評(píng)話語(yǔ)分析的融合[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2008年05期

7 李克;李淑康;;批評(píng)轉(zhuǎn)喻分析的意識(shí)形態(tài)觀[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2011年05期

8 李克;李淑康;;批評(píng)轉(zhuǎn)喻分析與辭屏研究[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2012年04期

9 洪艷青,張輝;認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)與意識(shí)形態(tài)研究[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2002年02期

10 朱永生;框架理論對(duì)語(yǔ)境動(dòng)態(tài)研究的啟示[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2005年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳晨;中美新聞報(bào)道中關(guān)于釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的批評(píng)性語(yǔ)篇分析[D];華中科技大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1923181