本文選題：唐五代史料筆記 + 訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容�。� 參考：《山東師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：筆記是中國(guó)古代文學(xué)中較為常見(jiàn)的一種文學(xué)體裁。作為一種文體，筆記最早是與辭賦等韻文相對(duì)而言的。筆記這種體裁萌芽于漢代，如班固的《白虎通義》、應(yīng)劭的《風(fēng)俗通義》等。但是“筆記”這一名稱，起于六朝時(shí)。中國(guó)古代的筆記，在魏晉之后得到了迅速的發(fā)展。唐五代是筆記發(fā)展的重要階段，這一時(shí)期各種類型的筆記大量出現(xiàn)，據(jù)不完全統(tǒng)計(jì)應(yīng)該在二百部以上。唐五代筆記在中國(guó)古代筆記史上具有重要的意義，尤其是史料筆記，不僅具有極高的史料價(jià)值，而且對(duì)文學(xué)、語(yǔ)言學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)等的研究也有極高的價(jià)值。 本文在對(duì)唐五代二十五部史料筆記的訓(xùn)詁條目進(jìn)行整理的基礎(chǔ)上，詳細(xì)分析了其中的訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容及訓(xùn)詁方法。另外，通過(guò)對(duì)唐五代史料筆記中的訓(xùn)詁資料與《漢語(yǔ)大詞典》進(jìn)行比對(duì)后，進(jìn)一步補(bǔ)正了《漢語(yǔ)大詞典》的相關(guān)詞條。 全文共分為五部分： 緒論部分介紹了筆記與筆記訓(xùn)詁的內(nèi)涵及特點(diǎn)，總結(jié)了唐五代史料筆記的時(shí)代背景和研究?jī)r(jià)值，并在廣泛搜集材料的基礎(chǔ)上分析了唐五代史料筆記的研究現(xiàn)狀。 第一章“唐五代史料筆記訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容”，主要從考釋詞語(yǔ)、考辨讀音、考釋文字、串講文意、說(shuō)明修辭、探求詞語(yǔ)出處等六個(gè)方面討論了唐五代史料筆記中涉及到的訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容。 第二章“唐五代史料筆記的訓(xùn)詁方法”，主要從求義方法和釋義方法兩個(gè)角度分析了唐五代史料筆記中涉及到的訓(xùn)詁方法。 第三章“唐五代史料筆記對(duì)《漢語(yǔ)大詞典》的補(bǔ)正”論述了唐五代史料筆記對(duì)辭書(shū)編纂的價(jià)值。我們把唐五代史料筆記中的訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容與《漢語(yǔ)大詞典》的釋詞進(jìn)行了比對(duì)，，重點(diǎn)討論了《漢語(yǔ)大詞典》中存在的詞條失收、義項(xiàng)缺失、引證嫌遲、書(shū)證不足等問(wèn)題，其中詞條失收64條，義項(xiàng)缺失7條，引證嫌遲12條，書(shū)證不足5條。 結(jié)語(yǔ)部分進(jìn)一步總結(jié)全文，再一次強(qiáng)調(diào)了唐五代史料筆記的價(jià)值所在。 筆記是一種重要的文學(xué)形式，而唐五代史料筆記對(duì)語(yǔ)言學(xué)的研究與發(fā)展起著重要作用，希望通過(guò)本文的研究，使學(xué)術(shù)界注意到唐五代史料筆記對(duì)語(yǔ)言學(xué)的重要價(jià)值，從而對(duì)其進(jìn)行更為深入的研究，使唐五代史料筆記的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值得到充分的挖掘。
[Abstract]:Notes are a common literary genre in ancient Chinese literature. As a style of writing, notes are originally relative to verse such as Fu. Note-taking originated in the Han Dynasty, such as Ban Gu's "Bai Hu Tong Yi", venerable "Custom Tong Yi" and so on. But the name Notebook began in the six dynasties. The notes of ancient China developed rapidly after the Wei and Jin dynasties. Tang and five dynasties is an important stage in the development of notes. During this period, various types of notes appeared in large numbers, and according to incomplete statistics, they should be more than 200. The notes of Tang and five dynasties are of great significance in the history of Chinese ancient notes, especially the notes of historical materials, which are of great value not only in the study of literature, linguistics and sociology, but also in the study of literature, linguistics and sociology. On the basis of sorting out the exegesis items of 25 historical data notes in the Tang and five dynasties, this paper analyzes in detail the exegetical contents and exegetical methods. In addition, by comparing the exegetical materials in the historical notes of Tang and five dynasties with the Chinese Dictionary, the relevant entries of the Chinese Dictionary are further corrected. The full text is divided into five parts: The introduction part introduces the connotation and characteristics of notes and notes exegesis, summarizes the historical background and research value of historical notes of Tang and five dynasties, and analyzes the current research situation of historical notes of Tang and five dynasties on the basis of extensive collection of materials. The first chapter, "the content of the historical materials notes of the Tang and five dynasties", mainly discusses the exegesis contents involved in the notes of the historical materials of the Tang and five dynasties from six aspects of textual research, textual interpretation, literary meaning, rhetoric explanation, and exploration of the source of the words and phrases in the notes of historical materials of the Tang and five dynasties. The second chapter, "Exegetical methods of the historical notes of the Tang and five dynasties", mainly analyzes the exegesis methods involved in the notes of historical materials of the Tang and five dynasties from two angles: the method of seeking meaning and the method of interpretation. The third chapter discusses the value of the historical notes of Tang and five dynasties to the compilation of dictionaries. We compare the exegesis in the historical notes of the Tang and the five dynasties with the interpretation of the Chinese Dictionary, and focus on the problems of missing entries, missing meanings, late citations and insufficient documentary evidence in the Great Chinese Dictionary. Among them, 64 entries were lost, 7 were missing, 12 were late, and less than 5 were documentary evidence. The conclusion part further summarizes the full text, and emphasizes once again the value of the historical notes of the Tang and five dynasties. Notes are an important form of literature, and the notes of historical materials of Tang and five dynasties play an important role in the research and development of linguistics. It is hoped that through the study of this paper, the academic circles will notice the important value of historical notes of Tang and five dynasties to linguistics. Therefore, the academic value of historical notes of Tang and five dynasties can be fully excavated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H131;H164

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張?zhí)?沙愛(ài)敏;;從訓(xùn)詁的角度看《聊齋志異》詞語(yǔ)的訓(xùn)釋[J];蒲松齡研究;2006年04期

2 王其和;;《右臺(tái)仙館筆記》之漢語(yǔ)史資料[J];蒲松齡研究;2010年02期

3 高興;古人筆記與《漢語(yǔ)大詞典》[J];安徽師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年04期

4 朱傲蕾;;試論唐代筆記小說(shuō)中親屬稱謂語(yǔ)的外化[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

5 鄧紅梅;;唐宋筆記中民間隱語(yǔ)的特點(diǎn)[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

6 郭作飛;周紅苓;;唐宋筆記疑難語(yǔ)詞考釋[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;2009年04期

7 吳慶峰;《閱微草堂筆記》之漢語(yǔ)史資料[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2001年06期

8 范崇高;唐代筆記小說(shuō)校語(yǔ)散議[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;1996年06期

9 馮玉濤;郭常娟;;關(guān)于訓(xùn)詁的體式、體例、條例、方法和方式——目前訓(xùn)詁學(xué)著作中相關(guān)問(wèn)題之比較分析[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

10 王鳳產(chǎn);;《本草綱目》中的植物名稱訓(xùn)詁及其影響[J];中國(guó)科技術(shù)語(yǔ);2011年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔡靜波;唐五代筆記小說(shuō)研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 段英倩;清代史料筆記訓(xùn)詁研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2012年

2 李娟紅;宋代筆記中訓(xùn)詁學(xué)問(wèn)題研究[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

3 郭寧;唐代筆記小說(shuō)副詞研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1901623