本文選題：流利性 + 口語(yǔ)成績(jī)測(cè)試��； 參考：《華文教學(xué)與研究》2012年01期

【摘要】：在漢語(yǔ)教學(xué)中,口語(yǔ)課程的成績(jī)測(cè)試一直存在著不夠規(guī)范、缺乏客觀性和評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不夠明確的問(wèn)題。本文考察了12位漢語(yǔ)專(zhuān)職教師的評(píng)分過(guò)程,通過(guò)分析他們對(duì)10名學(xué)生口試樣本的評(píng)分及評(píng)分依據(jù),探討了教師標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的一致性和差異性,在此基礎(chǔ)上確定了適宜于考察漢語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)水平的5項(xiàng)11點(diǎn)評(píng)估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:In Chinese teaching, there are always some problems in the test of oral English, such as the lack of objectivity and the lack of clear grading criteria. This paper examines the scoring process of 12 full-time Chinese teachers, and discusses the consistency and difference of teachers' standards by analyzing their scores and the basis of scoring for 10 students' oral test samples. On the basis of this, five 11:00 evaluation criteria suitable for Chinese oral proficiency were determined.
【作者單位】： 北京語(yǔ)言大學(xué)教務(wù)處;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H193

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 文秋芳,趙學(xué)熙;全國(guó)英語(yǔ)四級(jí)錄音口試評(píng)分的實(shí)踐與研究[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年02期

2 王佶e，

本文編號(hào)：1899135