本文選題：評(píng)價(jià)理論 + 介入資源��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：政治新聞?wù)Z篇屬于媒體話語(yǔ),近年來(lái),由于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)科技的迅猛發(fā)展,越來(lái)越多的新聞媒體利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒體向公眾發(fā)布新聞,使人們能更加迅速、更加便捷的對(duì)最新發(fā)生的新聞事件加以了解。新聞中常常暗含著作者對(duì)所述事件或者命題的主觀評(píng)價(jià)和立場(chǎng)。因此,新聞?wù)Z篇中的語(yǔ)言中隱含著人際意義,折射出語(yǔ)篇中不同觀念和立場(chǎng)之間的互動(dòng)和協(xié)商過(guò)程。 韓禮得的系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)法研究語(yǔ)篇的人際意義,涉及了人際功能,其影響十分廣泛,同時(shí)也不可避免的存在著其局限性。J.R.Martin等人在其基礎(chǔ)上提出了評(píng)價(jià)理論,進(jìn)一步發(fā)展了人際意義的研究。評(píng)價(jià)理論是用語(yǔ)言表達(dá)態(tài)度的資源系統(tǒng),是研究構(gòu)建人際意義的詞匯-語(yǔ)法方法。評(píng)價(jià)理論所關(guān)注的是語(yǔ)篇中進(jìn)行互動(dòng)和協(xié)商的各種態(tài)度,它們所涉及到的情感的強(qiáng)度,以及表明價(jià)值和聯(lián)盟讀者的各種方式。(MartinWhite,2005：1)評(píng)價(jià)理論包含三個(gè)子系統(tǒng)：態(tài)度(Attitude),介入(Engagement)和級(jí)差(Graduation),每個(gè)子系統(tǒng)又可以進(jìn)一步分為更多的分支子系統(tǒng)。由于時(shí)間和篇幅的限制,本研究只關(guān)注介入資源及其各個(gè)分支子系統(tǒng)的在英漢政治新聞?wù)Z篇中的使用和對(duì)比。 本研究的英文語(yǔ)料來(lái)自英國(guó)《衛(wèi)報(bào)》和美國(guó)《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》網(wǎng)站上的政治新聞,各15篇,中文語(yǔ)料來(lái)自中國(guó)《人民日?qǐng)?bào)》和新華網(wǎng)的政治新聞,各15篇。英語(yǔ)新聞?wù)Z篇共30篇,總字?jǐn)?shù)為29,938字,漢語(yǔ)新聞?wù)Z篇共30篇,總字?jǐn)?shù)為29,722字。本研究使用語(yǔ)言學(xué)統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件UAM Corpus Tool進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)分析,結(jié)合定性分析和定量分析,分析發(fā)現(xiàn)介入資源大量存在于英漢兩種語(yǔ)言的政治新聞?wù)Z篇中,且英語(yǔ)新聞中的介入資源頻率明顯高于漢語(yǔ)新聞。 英漢政治新聞?wù)Z篇中介入資源的分布情況有以下幾點(diǎn)相似之處：1.兩種語(yǔ)言的政治新聞?wù)Z篇中,對(duì)話擴(kuò)展(Dialogic Expansion)的頻率都高于對(duì)話收縮(Dialogic Contraction)的頻率(英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中為65.7%,漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中為53.9%)；2.在對(duì)話擴(kuò)展中,否認(rèn)資源(Disclaim)的頻率(英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中為27.4%,漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中為35.7%)高于聲明資源(Proclaim)的頻率(英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇6.9%中為,漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中為10.2%)；3.在聲明資源中,使用頻率最高的是支持資源(Endorse),在英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中占3.6%,漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中占7.9%；4.在對(duì)話擴(kuò)展中,兩種語(yǔ)言篇使用最多的都是承認(rèn)資源(Acknowledge)在英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中占32.0%,漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中占28.9%。 與此同時(shí),本研究也發(fā)現(xiàn)介入資源在英漢政治新聞?wù)Z篇中的分布存在著兩點(diǎn)主要差異：1.在對(duì)話收縮資源中,英語(yǔ)政治新聞作者傾向于使用更多的對(duì)立資源(Counter)和一致資源(Concur),其頻率分別為57.7%和28.9%,而漢語(yǔ)政治新聞?wù)Z篇中則使用更多的否定資源(Deny)和支持資源(Endorse),分別占其所屬子系統(tǒng)的53.7%和77.4%;2.在對(duì)話擴(kuò)展資源中,英語(yǔ)政治新聞作者使用了更多的引發(fā)資源(Entertain)和承認(rèn)資源(Acknowledge),分別占50.6%和98.5%,漢語(yǔ)政治新聞?wù)Z篇中存在更多的摘引資源(Attribute)和疏遠(yuǎn)性引述資源(Distance),分別占57.8%和7.4%。 本研究將評(píng)價(jià)理論應(yīng)用于英漢政治新聞?wù)Z篇的對(duì)比分析,著重分忻了介入系統(tǒng)和它的各分支子系統(tǒng)在兩種語(yǔ)言的新聞?wù)Z篇中不同的分布規(guī)律及其實(shí)現(xiàn)方式,試圖探究英漢政治新聞的作者如何利用介入資源與讀者進(jìn)行協(xié)商與互動(dòng),從而做出更為客觀和權(quán)威的報(bào)道,并對(duì)英漢政治新聞中介入資源分布的不同點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析,試圖做出解釋。希望能為評(píng)價(jià)理論在不同領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用做出貢獻(xiàn),也希望能為后續(xù)研究提供靈感和啟發(fā)。
[Abstract]:The political news discourse is a media discourse. In recent years, because of the rapid development of Internet technology, more and more news media are using the network media to publish news to the public, making people more quick and convenient to understand the latest news events. The news often implies the author of the event or the subject of the subject. Therefore, news language contains implicit interpersonal meaning, reflecting the interaction and negotiation process between different concepts and positions in discourse.
The systemic functional grammar of Han rite studies the interpersonal meaning of the discourse, involving interpersonal function, which has a very extensive influence, and the inevitable existence of its limitations.J.R.Martin and others on the basis of which the evaluation theory is put forward, and the research of interpersonal meaning is further developed. The theory of evaluation focuses on the various attitudes of interaction and negotiation in the discourse, the intensity of the emotions they involve, and the various ways of showing value and the alliance readers. (MartinWhite, 2005:1) evaluation theory contains three subsystems: Attitude, Engagement and Graduation, each subsystem can be further divided into more branch subsystems. Due to the limitation of time and length, this study focuses on the use and comparison of the intervening resources and their branches in English and Chinese political news texts.
The English corpus of this study comes from the political news on the British guardian and the United States New York Times website, each of the 15 articles. The Chinese corpus comes from China's "the people's Daily" and the political news of Xinhuanet, each of the 15 articles. There are 30 English news texts, the total number of words is 29938, the Chinese news text is 30, the total number of words is 29722 words. The statistical software UAM Corpus Tool is used to analyze the data, combining qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. It is found that the intervention resources exist in English and Chinese two languages in political news discourse, and the frequency of intervention resources in English news is obviously higher than that in Chinese news.
There are the following similarities in the distribution of English and Chinese political news discourse Intermediaries: 1. in the political news discourse of two languages, the frequency of Dialogic Expansion is higher than the frequency of Dialogic Contraction (65.7% in the English text, 53.9% in the Chinese text); 2. in the expansion of the dialogue, the denial of capital The frequency of Disclaim (27.4% in English text, 35.7% in Chinese text) is higher than the frequency of Proclaim (in English text 6.9%, in Chinese text 10.2%); 3. in declarative resources, the highest frequency is supporting resources (Endorse), 3.6% in English discourse, 7.9% in Chinese, and 4. in the expansion of dialogue, Acknowledge is the most widely used language in two languages, accounting for 32% in English discourse, and 28.9%. in Chinese.
At the same time, this study also found that there are two main differences in the distribution of intervention resources in English and Chinese Political News Texts: 1. in the dialogue contraction resources, English political news writers tend to use more opposing resources (Counter) and consistent resources (Concur), the frequency of which is 57.7% and 28.9% respectively, while Chinese political news texts are in the Chinese political news discourse. More negative resources (Deny) and support resources (Endorse) are used to account for 53.7% and 77.4% of their subsystems respectively. 2. in the dialogue expansion resources, English political news writers use more Entertain and Acknowledge, accounting for 50.6% and 98.5% respectively. There are more resources in Chinese political news discourse. Sources (Attribute) and remote quoted resources (Distance) accounted for 57.8% and 7.4%. respectively.
This study applies the theory of evaluation to the contrastive analysis of English and Chinese political news discourse, focusing on the different distribution rules and ways of their distribution of the intervention system and its sub branch systems in the two language news texts. To make more objective and authoritative reports, and to analyze the distribution of resources in English and Chinese political news media, try to make an explanation. I hope to contribute to the application of the evaluation theory in different fields, and also hope to provide inspiration and inspiration for the follow-up research.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H315;H15

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 李曙光;;語(yǔ)篇對(duì)話性與英語(yǔ)書(shū)面新聞?wù)Z篇分析[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2007年06期

2 陳淑芳;評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)與詞匯產(chǎn)出[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2002年06期

3 王振華;“硬新聞”的態(tài)度研究——“評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)”應(yīng)用研究之二[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2004年05期

4 李君;張德祿;;電視新聞訪談介入特征的韻律性模式探索[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2010年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 朱麗軒;政體新聞報(bào)道中語(yǔ)氣系統(tǒng)的人際功能[D];東北師范大學(xué);2005年

2 段靜;西方政治新聞?wù)Z篇的批評(píng)性語(yǔ)篇分析[D];廣西大學(xué);2005年

3 惠長(zhǎng)征;英語(yǔ)政治新聞報(bào)道的批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2006年

4 李琪;評(píng)價(jià)性形容詞在小句中的語(yǔ)義結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2006年

5 莊麗瑩;英語(yǔ)政治新聞報(bào)導(dǎo)中的轉(zhuǎn)喻[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2007年

6 徐曉霞;中美政治新聞報(bào)道的批評(píng)性語(yǔ)篇分析[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年

7 張麗;英漢硬新聞的介入資源對(duì)比研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

8 彭曉琳;關(guān)于英語(yǔ)新聞訪談介入資源的分析[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1896900