發(fā)布時間：2018-05-12 16:41

  本文選題：誤解 + 基點與調(diào)整經(jīng)驗推理　； 參考：《山西大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：大量研究證明,由于聽話人與說話人的主觀性以及語言的不確定性,交際中誤解是不可避免的。然而,正是它的不可避免性激發(fā)了許多研究者的興趣,并成為炙手可熱的研究課題。人們希望可以通過研究,找到它的根源,并指導(dǎo)實踐,降低誤解發(fā)生的頻率,從而避免嚴(yán)重后果的發(fā)生。 本文旨在從認(rèn)知心理學(xué)的角度研究誤解的現(xiàn)象,并試圖用調(diào)查問卷的方法證明,基點與調(diào)整經(jīng)驗推理是誤解形成的根源之一。此經(jīng)驗推理方法是在1974年由Tversky和Kahneman首先提出,隨后主要被應(yīng)用于金融領(lǐng)域。為確保問卷的效度,我們將基點與調(diào)整經(jīng)驗推理植入問卷的每個題目,受試者選擇的答案可以直接反應(yīng)他們在話語理解過程中是否會受到基點與調(diào)整經(jīng)驗推理的影響。借助SPSS做數(shù)據(jù)分析后,調(diào)查結(jié)果顯示,受基點與調(diào)整心理傾向的影響,當(dāng)對話人面對有歧義的句子時,傾向于根據(jù)先前最近的語境或話輪做出判斷(即根據(jù)基點判斷),如果聽話人與說話人所關(guān)注的基點相同,則誤解不會發(fā)生；相反,如果聽話人所關(guān)注的基點不同于說話人的,則誤解發(fā)生。由此得出結(jié)論,基點與調(diào)整經(jīng)驗推理是誤解形成的根源之一。 本研究從一個嶄新的角度研究了誤解的根源,為后續(xù)的研究提供了借鑒,并可以指導(dǎo)實踐,使對話雙方從根本上降低誤解的發(fā)生頻率,抑制嚴(yán)重后果的發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:A large number of studies have proved that misunderstanding in communication is inevitable due to the subjectivity of hearer and speaker and the uncertainty of language. However, it is its inevitability that arouses the interest of many researchers and becomes a hot research topic. It is hoped that we can find out the root causes of misunderstandings, guide practice and reduce the frequency of misunderstandings so as to avoid the occurrence of serious consequences. The purpose of this paper is to study the phenomenon of misunderstanding from the perspective of cognitive psychology, and try to use the questionnaire to prove that the basic point and the adjustment of empirical reasoning are one of the root causes of the formation of misunderstanding. This empirical reasoning method was first proposed by Tversky and Kahneman in 1974, and then mainly applied in the field of finance. In order to ensure the validity of the questionnaire, we implant the basic point and adjustment empirical reasoning into each topic of the questionnaire. The answers chosen by the subjects can directly reflect whether they will be influenced by the basic point and the adjusted empirical reasoning in the process of discourse comprehension. With the help of SPSS data analysis, the results show that, under the influence of basic point and adjustment psychological tendency, when the interlocutor is faced with ambiguous sentences, A tendency to make judgments based on a previous recent context or turn (that is, on the basis of a basic point), misunderstandings do not occur if the listener and the speaker are concerned with the same basis point; on the contrary, if the hearer's focus is different from that of the speaker, Misunderstandings occur. It is concluded that the basic point and the adjustment of empirical reasoning are one of the root causes of the formation of misunderstanding. This study studies the causes of misunderstanding from a new perspective, which provides a reference for further research, and can guide the practice, so that both sides of the dialogue can fundamentally reduce the frequency of misunderstanding and restrain the occurrence of serious consequences.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H136

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅毅,張麗華;漢、英語言中的歧義現(xiàn)象及排除[J];四川師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年02期

2 楊堅;;誤解的層次分析[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年02期

3 周利娟;從認(rèn)知角度看交際中的誤解[J];外語學(xué)刊;2003年03期

4 宗世海;誤解分類的理論與實踐[J];外語學(xué)刊;2004年04期

5 馮壽忠;;“誤解”初探[J];山東師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1983年06期

6 于國棟;;醫(yī)患交際中回述的會話分析研究[J];外語教學(xué);2009年03期

7 吳亞欣;;語用推理過程中心理傾向的干擾:誤解的認(rèn)知根源[J];外語教學(xué);2011年01期

8 王得杏;談話里的協(xié)調(diào)[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;1993年01期

9 宗世海;論誤解的形成機制[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2005年02期

10 陳明芳,楊信彰;言語交際中誤解的認(rèn)知成因[J];外語電化教學(xué);2005年03期

，

本文編號：1879357