本文關(guān)鍵詞： 經(jīng)驗 語言性 語言 伽達默爾 詮釋學　出處：《大連理工大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：語言問題是二十世紀哲學的核心議題。分析哲學強調(diào)語言邏輯分析或語義分析,并將其作為哲學的基本任務(wù)；以索緒爾為代表的現(xiàn)代語言學及結(jié)構(gòu)主義語言學,注重分析語言本身的結(jié)構(gòu)；現(xiàn)象學派胡塞爾則認為語言是思想的外在表現(xiàn)形式。可見,不同哲學流派從不同視角對語言問題進行探究,呈現(xiàn)出邏輯化、形式化以及符號化的研究特征,但均未能深入到語言關(guān)涉人類經(jīng)驗的本體性維度。在哲學詮釋學視域下,伽達默爾則以人類經(jīng)驗為出發(fā)點,轉(zhuǎn)向?qū)φZ言本質(zhì)的關(guān)注。本文試圖在伽達默爾詮釋學視域下,以語言對經(jīng)驗的結(jié)構(gòu)化作用為研究進路,探討語言的本質(zhì)問題。論文主要從伽達默爾語言基本觀點,及作為經(jīng)驗固化、秩序化、多樣化過程的語言性四個章節(jié)進行論證。論文第一章試圖界定伽達默爾以語言性為內(nèi)涵的語言基本觀點。語言作為人類理解的本體論視域,擺脫了符號化、工具化的傳統(tǒng)觀點,通過組織人類經(jīng)驗,以理解參與世界建構(gòu)的方式彌合主—客二分的境遇。因此語言問題轉(zhuǎn)向語言性問題。第二章主要論述作為經(jīng)驗固化過程的語言性。語言以概念構(gòu)成事件的方式,使世界得以揭示,具有構(gòu)造性。因此,在以語言為媒介的理解過程中,經(jīng)驗以概念的形式得以聚集儲存,并通過概念化過程得以顯現(xiàn)。第三章主要論述作為經(jīng)驗秩序化過程的語言性。經(jīng)驗通過語言內(nèi)在對話結(jié)構(gòu)的作用,使得效果歷史意識具體化,進而在問答對話結(jié)構(gòu)以事實化的形式得以持存,顯現(xiàn)其秩序性；第四章主要論述作為經(jīng)驗多樣化過程的語言性。語言以其多種思辨特征,加強了“揭示”與“對話”功能。這一點尤其表現(xiàn)在文學作品中,經(jīng)驗通過與文學傳統(tǒng)對話,思辨化的世界構(gòu)建等形式以更為豐富化、精細化的角度形成自身。最后文章得出結(jié)論,語言以揭示世界,內(nèi)在對話結(jié)構(gòu)以及思辨的表達形式等內(nèi)涵性質(zhì),使得經(jīng)驗概念化、事實化、精細化。經(jīng)驗因而通過固化、秩序化以及多樣化的過程形成并表述自身,進而反映伽達默爾詮釋學視域下,覆蓋人類在世之本體論視域,具有語言性內(nèi)涵的語言觀點。
[Abstract]:Language is the core issue of philosophy in 20th century. Analytic philosophy emphasizes language logic analysis or semantic analysis and regards it as the basic task of philosophy. Modern linguistics and structuralist linguistics, represented by Saussure, focus on analyzing the structure of language itself. The phenomenological school Husserl thinks that language is the external form of thought. It can be seen that different philosophical schools explore language from different perspectives and present the characteristics of logic formalization and symbolization. However, all of them fail to go deep into the Noumenon dimension of language which concerns human experience. In the field of philosophical hermeneutics, Gadamer takes human experience as the starting point. From the perspective of Gadamer's hermeneutics, this paper attempts to focus on the structuralization of language to experience. This paper mainly discusses the essence of language from the perspective of Gadamer's language, as well as as an empirical solidification and orderization. The first chapter tries to define Gadamer's basic viewpoint of language with the connotation of language. Language, as an ontological perspective of human understanding, gets rid of symbolization. A conventional view of instrumentation through the organization of human experience. Therefore, the language problem turns to the linguistic problem. The second chapter mainly discusses the language as the experience solidification process, language forms the event way by the concept. So that the world can be revealed, constructive. Therefore, in the process of understanding in the medium of language, experience is gathered and stored in the form of concepts. And through the conceptualization process can be manifested. Chapter three mainly discusses the language as the process of empirical orderization. Experience through the role of language internal dialogue structure makes the effect of historical consciousness concrete. Then, the structure of the question and answer dialogue can be maintained in the form of fact, showing its order. Chapter 4th mainly discusses the language as a process of experience diversification. Language, with its many speculative characteristics, strengthens the function of "revealing" and "dialogue", which is especially manifested in literary works. Experience forms itself through dialogue with literary tradition, speculative world construction and so on. Finally, the article draws a conclusion, language to reveal the world. Internal dialogue structure and speculative forms of expression make experience conceptualized, factual and refined. Thus, experience forms and expresses itself through the process of solidification, orderization and diversification. Furthermore, it reflects the linguistic viewpoint with linguistic connotations covering the ontological horizon of human being under the perspective of Gadamer's hermeneutics.
【學位授予單位】：大連理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H0;B516.59

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓潮;語言存在論與語言辯證法——伽達默爾語言哲學研究[J];復(fù)旦學報(社會科學版);2001年04期

2 趙一凡;;海德格爾:藝術(shù)與語言[J];外國文學;2006年03期

3 白雪;;伽達默爾詮釋學語言觀及其現(xiàn)代意義[J];廣西社會科學;2007年09期

4 李巖;;誰擁有語言,誰就擁有世界——淺析伽達默爾的語言觀[J];科教文匯(下旬刊);2007年02期

5 李國山;柏拉圖語言哲學探析[J];南開學報;2005年03期

6 隋曉荻;徐明鶯;白雪花;;存在、變化、語言的統(tǒng)一體——論伽達默爾的傳統(tǒng)觀[J];理論探討;2011年06期

7 朱耀平;世界的詮釋——伽達默爾的語言本體論思想辨正[J];求是學刊;2002年02期

8 潘德榮;伽達默爾的語言詮釋學[J];學術(shù)界;1995年01期

9 殷杰;何華;;語言與理解——伽達默爾詮釋學的“語言轉(zhuǎn)向”及其對實用主義哲學的影響[J];山西大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年03期

10 秦明利;;對此在的把握——論T.S.艾略特的傳統(tǒng)觀[J];國外文學;2011年04期

，

本文編號：1475974