本文關鍵詞： 倒 卻 對比 轉折 焦點 篇章連接　出處：《大連理工大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：本文從前人研究成果的基礎上,以出現(xiàn)虛詞“倒”與“卻”的句子為研究對象,把現(xiàn)代漢語三個平面的基礎語法理論及篇章結構功能理論相結合,運用近義詞對比到具體實踐上來,擬從各個方面對這組近義詞進行全面的辨析,力求達到清楚明確的區(qū)分效果。同時,對虛詞“倒”“卻”的辨析有利于充實并深化語言本體研究,為漢語初學者帶來學習方便,積累一定的資料。 文章主要從四個方面對它們進行了比較： 一是對它們的背景語義進行分析,認為他們的預期都帶有一種“理應性”。并認為它們在“表示對比”、“擁有轉折屬性”和“含有語氣意義”和焦點及篇章結構方面都表現(xiàn)出共同特征。 二是分析它們表對比和轉折屬性時的差異,表示對比語義時,“倒”的使用范圍較“卻”廣泛,究其原因,主要因為“倒”是評注性副詞,統(tǒng)籌整個句子,意在表達作者的主觀傾向,故重對比而輕對立；“卻”強調結果,修飾限制后面的謂語,在表示對立語義上更強調矛盾沖突,其轉折程度也比“倒”強,“倒”后面接事物良好或積極的方面,且常用于口語中,此時評注性副詞“倒”含有說話者的評價和喜好傾向。 三是語氣功能方面的差異,分為增添語氣、增強語氣和弱化語氣三方面。 四是語用層面和篇章結構的連接功能方面。認為“倒”的焦點位置更靈活,焦點的反射域也比“卻”更大,相對應的篇章連接功能方面“倒”也呈現(xiàn)出多樣化特點。 “倒”的用法范圍的廣泛造成很多外國留學生的誤用,漢語教學者在解釋區(qū)分“倒”與“卻”的用法時,我們建議不要但單從某一方面就妄想?yún)^(qū)分它們,而應全面掌握知識點、靈活辨析。
[Abstract]:Based on the previous research results, this paper combines the basic grammatical theory of three planes of modern Chinese with the theory of textual structure and function by taking the sentences of "inverted" and "but" as the object of study. The use of synonyms contrast to the specific practice, from all aspects of this group of synonyms comprehensive discrimination, strive to achieve a clear and clear distinction. At the same time. The analysis of the function word "inverted" "but" is beneficial to enrich and deepen the study of language ontology, bring Chinese beginners easy to learn and accumulate certain data. This paper mainly compares them from four aspects: The first is to analyze their background semantics, think that their expectations are with a "reasonable nature", and think that they are "to show contrast." There are common characteristics in the aspects of "having the attribute of turning point" and "containing mood meaning" and the focus and the structure of the text. The second is to analyze the differences between the contrastive and turning attributes of them, and to express the contrastive semantics, the scope of use of "inverted" is wider than that of "but". The main reason is that "inverted" is a commentary adverb, and the whole sentence is as a whole. It is intended to express the subjective tendency of the author, so the author pays more attention to contrast than opposition; "but" emphasizes the result, modifies the predicate after the restriction, emphasizes the contradiction and conflict more in the meaning of opposition, and its turning degree is also stronger than the "inverted", and the good or positive aspects of the "upside down" followed by the thing. And often used in spoken English, the commentary adverb "inverted" implies the speaker's tendency of evaluation and preference. The third is the difference of mood function, which is divided into three aspects: adding tone, strengthening tone and weakening tone. The fourth is the connection function of pragmatic level and text structure. It is believed that the focus position of "inverted" is more flexible, and the reflection field of focus is larger than that of "but". The corresponding text connection function is also characterized by diversification. The wide scope of the use of "inverted" causes many foreign students to misuse it. In explaining the difference between "inverted" and "but", we suggest that we should not, but only from one aspect, distinguish between them. But should master the knowledge point in an all-round way, distinguish and analyze flexibly.
【學位授予單位】：大連理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 彭小川;論副詞“倒”的語篇功能——兼論對外漢語語篇教學[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1999年05期

2 李宗江;;副詞“倒”及相關副詞的語義功能和歷時演變[J];漢語學報;2005年02期

3 宗守云;“倒是”轉折句的語義模式[J];漢語學習;2001年01期

4 王功平;;“倒”與“卻”的交際功能對比研究[J];暨南大學華文學院學報;2007年02期

5 周紅;;副詞“倒”的預期推斷與語法意義——兼談對外漢語副詞教學[J];云南師范大學學報;2006年03期

6 彭利瑞;;副詞“倒”的語法化探析[J];語文學刊;2009年10期

7 梅立崇;關聯(lián)副詞“卻”試析[J];語言教學與研究;1998年03期

8 方緒軍;;表示轉折的“倒”和“卻”[J];語言科學;2004年05期

9 高玉蕾;;“卻”(S{)副詞用法的形成與發(fā)展[J];語言科學;2010年02期

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 劉婭敏;“反而”和“倒”的對比研究[D];安徽師范大學;2010年

2 劉清平;“卻”與“但是”的異同考察[D];暨南大學;2001年

3 魯娜;副詞“倒”的多角度考察[D];延邊大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1471096