敘事學(xué)角度下愛麗絲·門羅與丁玲作品的陰性書寫比較
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2025-01-14 19:32
愛麗絲·門羅是2013年諾貝爾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)的獲得者,也是加拿大著名短篇小說作家,丁玲是中國現(xiàn)代文學(xué)史上出類拔萃的女作家之一。作為著名的兩位女性主義作家,愛麗絲·門羅與丁玲在小說創(chuàng)作中有鮮明的陰性書寫特點(diǎn),她們用陰性書寫的方式表達(dá)女性在男權(quán)社會(huì)中的無奈和壓抑。愛麗絲·門羅的短篇小說《姑娘和女人們的生活》以及丁玲的作品《莎菲女士的日記》都描寫了女性對(duì)男權(quán)社會(huì)的逃離,但運(yùn)用了不同的陰性書寫方式,以往的研究對(duì)此鮮有關(guān)注。本文從敘事學(xué)原理出發(fā),對(duì)比愛麗絲·門羅和丁玲的代表作中的陰性書寫并對(duì)其異同進(jìn)行了原因分析。通過分析研究,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)在敘述視角方面,兩部小說都采用了內(nèi)視角,但是《姑娘和女人們的生活》不僅關(guān)注敘述者的內(nèi)心,也將視線投向歷史社會(huì)以及女性個(gè)人成長(zhǎng)等問題,而《莎菲女士的日記》更多的關(guān)注敘述者自己的內(nèi)心和情感;在敘述聲音方面,兩部小說都傾向于采用直接引語以增強(qiáng)說服力,但在書寫女性體驗(yàn)與女性欲望時(shí),兩部小說又有不同之處;在敘述結(jié)構(gòu)方面,《姑娘和女人們的生活》采取非線性的敘述結(jié)構(gòu),而《莎菲女士的日記》則采用了線性復(fù)調(diào)式敘事結(jié)構(gòu)。雖然同為女性主義作家,但是兩人所處的社會(huì)環(huán)境造成了不同的陰性書寫方式。愛麗絲...
【文章頁數(shù)】:59 頁
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Purpose of the Research
1.2 Significance of the Research
1.3 Structure of the Thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Previous Studies on Lives of Girls and Women
2.2 Previous Studies on Miss Sophie's Diary
2.3 Research Question
CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 Development of Narratology
3.2 Main Concepts of Narratology
3.2.1 Narrative Perspective
3.2.2 Narrative Vioce
3.2.3 Narrative Structure
3.3 Studies Between Narratology and Ecriture Feminine
CHAPTER FOUR ECRITURE FEMININE IN LIVES OF GIRLS ANDWOMEN AND MISS SOPHIE'S DIARY
4.1 Ecriture Feminine in Lives of Girls and Women
4.1.1 Introduction to Lives of Girls and Women
4.1.2 Ecriture Feminine of Lives of Girls and Women in Narrative Perspective
4.1.3 Ecriture Feminine of Lives of Girls and Women in Narrative Voice
4.1.4 Ecriture Feminine of Lives of Girls and Women in Narrative Structure
4.2 Ecriture Feminine in Miss Sophie's Diary
4.2.1 Introduction to Miss Sophie's Diary
4.2.2 Ecriture Feminine of Miss Sophie's Diary in Narrative Perspective
4.2.3 Ecriture Feminine of Miss Sophie s Diary in Narrative Voice
4.2.4 Ecriture Feminine of Miss Sophie's Diary in Narrative Structure
CHAPTER FIVE THE DIFFERENCE OFECRITURE FEMININE BETWEENTWO NOVELS AND REASON ANALYSIS
5.1 The Differences of Ecriture Feminine between Two Novels
5.1.1 Comparison from Narrative Perspective
5.1.2 Comparison from Narrative Voice
5.1.3 Comparison from Narrative Structure
5.2 Reasons Analysis
CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION
WORKS CITED
APPENDIX
本文編號(hào):4027082
【文章頁數(shù)】:59 頁
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Purpose of the Research
1.2 Significance of the Research
1.3 Structure of the Thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Previous Studies on Lives of Girls and Women
2.2 Previous Studies on Miss Sophie's Diary
2.3 Research Question
CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 Development of Narratology
3.2 Main Concepts of Narratology
3.2.1 Narrative Perspective
3.2.2 Narrative Vioce
3.2.3 Narrative Structure
3.3 Studies Between Narratology and Ecriture Feminine
CHAPTER FOUR ECRITURE FEMININE IN LIVES OF GIRLS ANDWOMEN AND MISS SOPHIE'S DIARY
4.1 Ecriture Feminine in Lives of Girls and Women
4.1.1 Introduction to Lives of Girls and Women
4.1.2 Ecriture Feminine of Lives of Girls and Women in Narrative Perspective
4.1.3 Ecriture Feminine of Lives of Girls and Women in Narrative Voice
4.1.4 Ecriture Feminine of Lives of Girls and Women in Narrative Structure
4.2 Ecriture Feminine in Miss Sophie's Diary
4.2.1 Introduction to Miss Sophie's Diary
4.2.2 Ecriture Feminine of Miss Sophie's Diary in Narrative Perspective
4.2.3 Ecriture Feminine of Miss Sophie s Diary in Narrative Voice
4.2.4 Ecriture Feminine of Miss Sophie's Diary in Narrative Structure
CHAPTER FIVE THE DIFFERENCE OFECRITURE FEMININE BETWEENTWO NOVELS AND REASON ANALYSIS
5.1 The Differences of Ecriture Feminine between Two Novels
5.1.1 Comparison from Narrative Perspective
5.1.2 Comparison from Narrative Voice
5.1.3 Comparison from Narrative Structure
5.2 Reasons Analysis
CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION
WORKS CITED
APPENDIX
本文編號(hào):4027082
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/4027082.html
教材專著