本文運(yùn)用諾斯羅普·弗萊的神話原型批評(píng)方法中的文學(xué)人物分類法，對(duì)彼得·潘和孫悟空兩位頑童人物代表進(jìn)行縱向貫通和橫向比較。多年來(lái)，文學(xué)中的頑童形象很少受到學(xué)者與讀者的關(guān)注。本文從發(fā)生、情節(jié)、主題、人物形象和敘事的角度，通過(guò)對(duì)兩位頑童的比較研究旨在重新喚起人們對(duì)頑童形象的核心“游戲精神”的思考。全文總共分為五部分。第一章，首先介紹了J.M.巴里和吳承恩兩部著作的創(chuàng)作背景，同時(shí)簡(jiǎn)要介紹了國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)彼得·潘與孫悟空的人物研究狀況，引出兩者比較的可能性。第二章，文章分析了中西文化背景下“兒童觀”的主流形態(tài)，以及在游戲精神關(guān)照下，中西文學(xué)作品中頑童形象所具有的不同特質(zhì)與游戲特征。第三章，論文分詳細(xì)闡述了彼得·潘和孫悟空在弗萊的文學(xué)人物分類下所進(jìn)行的比較研究。弗萊在他的神話原型批評(píng)理論中以英雄能量大小為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)將文學(xué)人物分為神邸、浪漫主義英雄、悲劇英雄、普通人以及諷刺英雄。英雄能量大小是相對(duì)于人類本身具有能量的高低而言提出的，分別體現(xiàn)在五種模仿模式中：神話模式，浪漫模式，高模仿模式，低級(jí)浪漫模式和諷刺模式。作為中西頑童形象代表，彼得·潘和孫悟空具有五種文學(xué)人物的共同特性，分別從神邸、冒險(xiǎn)家、悲劇英雄、純頑童... 

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：69 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements Abstract 摘要 Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Peter Pan and Monkey King－Two Maestros’ Encounter
1.2 Research Background
1.3 Possibility and Significance of Comparison Chapter Two Naughty BoysViewed under the Spirit of Game
2.1 Mainstream Attitudes towards Children
2.2 Natural Literary Form of Spirit of Game－Naughty Boys
    2.2.1 Secret of Spirit of Game
    2.2.2 Identity of Literary Naughty Boys Chapter Three A Multifaceted Comparison of Peter Pan and Monkey King
3.1 Frye’s Archetypal Theory
    3.1.1 Differences between Jung and Frye’s Archetypal Theories
    3.1.2 Categorization of Literary Characters
3.2 The Divine Beings－Origins of the Two Naughty Boys
    3.2.1 Peter Pan and the Greek Mythologies
    3.2.2 Monkey King and Eastern Ancient Mythologies
    3.2.3 A Cross-cultural Summon of Mythologies
3.3 The Romantic Heroes－Maximized Reveal of Naughty Boys
    3.3.1 Orientations of Two Adventurers－Search for Protagonists
    3.3.2 Maps to Ultimate Sublimation of Audacious Adventurers
    3.3.3 Mighty Monster-Killers－from Weapon to Mode of Victory
    3.3.4 The Fairytale Logic of the Secondary World
3.4 Anti-Authority Tragic Heroes－Avengers or Victims
    3.4.1 Tragic Heroes in Frye’s six Phases of Tragedy
    3.4.2 Tragic Codes of Avengers and Victims
    3.4.3 Tacit and Explicit Rebellion of Peter Pan and Monkey King
3.5 Naughty Boys with Common Gaiety
    3.5.1 An Introduction to Theory of Carnival
    3.5.2 Peter Pan and Monkey King’s Pure Delight
3.6 Satiric Heroes－Clowns under the Suppression of Religion
    3.6.1 Frye’s Satiric Hero
    3.6.2 Peter Pan and Calvinism
    3.6.3 Monkey King and Unity of Three Religions Chapter Four A Further Analysis of Similarities and Differences
4.1 Similarities of the Two Naughty Boys
4.2 Differences between the Two Characters
    4.2.1 Utopian and Dystopian
    4.2.2 Childhood and Adulthood
    4.2.3 Humanism and Feudalism Chapter Five Conclusion
5.1 Summary of Major Findings
5.2 Limitations of the Research
5.3 Suggestions for Future Portrayal Bibliography 發(fā)表論文和科研情況說(shuō)明


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]論《彼得·潘》的敘事話語(yǔ)[J]. 王昀.  作家. 2008(08)
[2]從托爾金的童話文學(xué)觀看《西游記》的童話性[J]. 舒?zhèn)?  重慶社會(huì)科學(xué). 2007(02)
[3]林格倫兒童文學(xué)的經(jīng)典性與現(xiàn)代性[J]. 張璦.  外國(guó)文學(xué)研究. 2004(02)
[4]童話里的原始思維質(zhì)態(tài)[J]. 吳文艷.  上海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2001(04)

博士論文
[1]純真并快樂(lè)著[D]. 徐韻.南京師范大學(xué) 2005



本文編號(hào)：3646355