發(fā)布時(shí)間：2021-04-18 03:22

　　鑒于翻譯行為時(shí)刻面臨并處理不同民族之間的文化差異，而處理這些跨語言、跨文化的信息傳遞又不可免地遭遇不同程度的信息失落、扭曲和增添，法國文學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)家羅伯特·埃斯卡皮（Robert Escarpit）敏銳地指出：“翻譯總是一種創(chuàng)造性叛逆”（1987：137）。謝天振教授非常欣賞并贊同這一觀點(diǎn)，認(rèn)為“它道出了翻譯、尤其是文學(xué)翻譯的實(shí)質(zhì)”（2012：33）�！笆菍�(duì)千百年來深信不疑的傳統(tǒng)譯學(xué)理念的一種糾正和補(bǔ)充”（ibid：37）。從上世紀(jì)90年代初至今，謝先生不斷撰文予以介紹和闡釋，并在他的《譯介學(xué)》一書中給予了比較全面、系統(tǒng)和深入的闡述。創(chuàng)造性叛逆理論承認(rèn)原作的價(jià)值，同時(shí)又借鑒了解構(gòu)主義譯論中關(guān)于譯者賦予原作以“來世”、當(dāng)代闡釋學(xué)理論關(guān)于“合法的偏見”等觀點(diǎn)，從跨文化和比較文學(xué)的高度，闡述了文學(xué)翻譯是一個(gè)再創(chuàng)造過程。創(chuàng)造性叛逆理論使譯者獲得了與原作者、讀者平等對(duì)話的權(quán)利，為重新審視文學(xué)翻譯的本質(zhì)和任務(wù)以及譯者在翻譯過程中的主體地位提供了嶄新的視角�！熬妥g者而言，尤其是一個(gè)認(rèn)真、負(fù)責(zé)的譯者，他主觀上確實(shí)在努力追求盡可能百分之百地忠實(shí)原文，盡可能百分之百地把原文的信息體現(xiàn)在譯文中，然而事實(shí)上這是... 

【文章來源】：上海外國語大學(xué)上海市 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：168 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background and Motivation of Research
    1.2 Aim and Significance of Research
    1.3 Methods of Research
    1.4 Structure and Arrangement
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Overview of Studies on Creative Treason
        2.1.1 Studies on Creative Treason Abroad
        2.1.2 Studies on Creative Treason at Home
    2.2 Research on Howard Goldblatt and His Literary Translation
        2.2.1 Howard Goldblatt and His Cultural Identity
        2.2.2 Goldblatt’s Translation of Modern and Contemporary Chinese Novels
        2.2.3 Research on Howard Goldblatt and His English Versions
    2.3 Howard Goldblatt’s Views on Literary Translation
        2.3.1 Faithful Translator and Creative Writer
        2.3.2 Translation as Betrayal
        2.3.3 Translation as Rewriting
        2.3.4 Translation as Intercultural Communication
Chapter Three Creative Treason in Literary Translation
    3.1 Literary Translation
        3.1.1 Characteristics and Principles of Literary Translation
        3.1.2 Literary Translation at Different Levels
    3.2 Subjects of Creative Treason in Literary Translation
        3.2.1 Translator
        3.2.2 Target Reader
        3.2.3 Original Author
    3.3 Types of Creative Treason in Literary Translation
        3.3.1 Individualized Translation
        3.3.2 Mistranslation and Missing Translation
        3.3.3 Abridged Translation and Edited Translation
        3.3.4 Indirect Translation and Adaptation
    3.4 Causes of Creative Treason in Literary Translation
        3.4.1 Linguistic Differences
        3.4.2 Cultural Differences
        3.4.3 Ideology, Poetics and Patronage
        3.4.4 Translator’s Own Subjective Choices
    3.5 Features of Creative Treason in Literary Translation
        3.5.1 Universality
        3.5.2 Source-text Prescriptiveness
        3.5.3 Duality
        3.5.4 Descriptiveness
Chapter Four Case Study of Howard Goldblatt’s Translation of Shengsi pilao 59
    4.1 Mo Yan and His Shengsi pilao
        4.1.1 Mo Yan and His Literary World
        4.1.2 Shengsi pilao and Its Artistic Features
    4.2 Fidelity and Treason at the Linguistic Level
        4.2.1 Colloquial Style
        4.2.2 Rhetorical Devices
    4.3 Fidelity and Treason at the Cultural Level
        4.3.1 Character Names
        4.3.2 Unique Expressions of Specific Historical Periods
        4.3.3 Images of Religious Culture
        4.3.4 Images of Idiomatic Expressions
    4.4 Fidelity and Treason at the Textual Level
        4.4.1 Omission of Indigestible Cultural Elements
        4.4.2 Omission of Similar Plots
        4.4.3 Omission of Complex Descriptions
        4.4.4 Omission of Minor Characters and Events
        4.4.5 Translation of Couplet Titles
        4.4.6 Principle of Simplification
    4.5 Rethinking Creative Treason and Fidelity
        4.5.1 Values of Creative Treason in Literary Translation
        4.5.2 Limitations of Creative Treason in Literary Translation
        4.5.3 Dialectical Relationship between Creative Treason and Fidelity
Chapter Five Factors and Revelations of Howard Goldblatt’s Success
    5.1 Factors of Howard Goldblatt’s Success in Literary Translation
        5.1.1 Excellent Bilingual Competence
        5.1.2 Deep Love for Chinese Literature and Literary Translation
        5.1.3 Strong Sense of Responsibility for Target Readers
        5.1.4 Good Relationship with the Original Authors
    5.2 Revelations of Howard Goldblatt’s Success in Literary Translation
        5.2.1 Reflection on Chinese-English Translator Models
        5.2.2 Reflection on Domestic Experience and Western Model
        5.2.3 Tentative Construction of Ideal Chinese-English Translator Model
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Research Conclusion
    6.2 Limitations of the Present Research
    6.3 Suggestions for Further Research
Bibliography
Appendix A
Appendix B


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]從幾篇重要文獻(xiàn)看葛浩文的翻譯思想[J]. 孫會(huì)軍.  東方翻譯. 2012 (04)
[2]藍(lán)詩玲:英國新生代漢學(xué)家[J]. 孫敬鑫.  對(duì)外傳播. 2012(06)
[3]創(chuàng)造性叛逆:爭論、實(shí)質(zhì)與意義[J]. 謝天振.  中國比較文學(xué). 2012(02)
[4]新時(shí)代語境期待中國翻譯研究的新突破[J]. 謝天振.  中國翻譯. 2012(01)
[5]中國文學(xué)英譯的合作、協(xié)商與文化傳播——漢英翻譯家葛浩文與林麗君訪談錄[J]. 李文靜.  中國翻譯. 2012(01)
[6]翻譯與跨文化交際策略[J]. 孫藝風(fēng).  中國翻譯. 2012(01)
[7]中國現(xiàn)當(dāng)代小說在英語世界傳播的背景、現(xiàn)狀及譯介模式[J]. 呂敏宏.  小說評(píng)論. 2011(05)
[8]翻譯研究:回歸現(xiàn)實(shí)世界——對(duì)“文化轉(zhuǎn)向”的再思考[J]. 胡牧.  中國翻譯. 2011(05)
[9]本土性、民族性的世界寫作——莫言的海外傳播與接受[J]. 劉江凱.  當(dāng)代作家評(píng)論. 2011(04)
[10]跟葛浩文學(xué)翻譯[J]. 孫會(huì)軍.  英語知識(shí). 2011(07)

博士論文
[1]手中放飛的風(fēng)箏[D]. 呂敏宏.南開大學(xué) 2010
[2]創(chuàng)造性叛逆：概念、理論與歷史描述[D]. 劉小剛.復(fù)旦大學(xué) 2006

碩士論文
[1]忠實(shí)或背叛：從《狼圖騰》英譯本看譯者主體性的運(yùn)用[D]. 田雨.山東師范大學(xué) 2011
[2]論譯者文化身份對(duì)葛浩文翻譯的影響[D]. 董晶晶.中南大學(xué) 2008
[3]莫言小說《紅高粱家族》在美國的譯介：接受與變異[D]. 左苗苗.貴州大學(xué) 2008
[4]探索更為合理的性別視角的譯作評(píng)論[D]. 陳麗娟.廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué) 2006
[5]文學(xué)翻譯中創(chuàng)造性叛逆的新闡釋[D]. 張虹.安徽大學(xué) 2005



本文編號(hào)：3144698