明清志怪小說和18世紀英國哥特小說敘事藝術比較研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-20 17:09
【摘要】： 明清志怪小說和18世紀英國哥特小說都是有關鬼怪的創(chuàng)作。鬼怪是人們臆想、虛構的產(chǎn)物。中國和英國有關鬼的文學作品都十分豐富。這類小說創(chuàng)作是對現(xiàn)實進行虛構的文體形式,當用小說文體去表現(xiàn)鬼的形象時,雙重的虛構會制造出一種天馬行空的自由想象的空間。明清志怪小說和18世紀英國哥特小說在各自的文學史中都屬于一個亞屬文類,處于邊緣地位。自二十世紀八十年代以來,英國對哥特小說的研究出現(xiàn)日趨高漲的熱潮。國內(nèi)受以往政治標準和閱讀思維定式的影響,對哥特小說的譯介和研究顯得不夠充分,國內(nèi)讀者對其還十分陌生。雖然有論者曾對明清志怪小說進行了新的解讀和詮釋,但其視野多囿于民族文學內(nèi)部,缺乏比較文學視野下的世界性眼光,很少從世界的范圍內(nèi)來看待它的重要價值和意義。 本文在比較的視野下,在分析代表作品的基礎上,就兩者在敘事藝術(敘事空間、敘事時間、敘事視角)方面的異同展開探討,從而彰顯它們共同的審美特性及其各自的獨特性與價值。本文分五部分。緒論部分,對志怪小說和哥特小說進行概述,指出二者的可比性。第一章為“敘事空間比較”,認為二者都運用了擬實和虛幻空間敘事,這種亦真亦幻的空間能產(chǎn)生怪誕和恐怖的審美效果,但又同中有異。第二章為“敘事時間比較”,從敘事時間的表現(xiàn)形態(tài)——順敘、倒敘、預敘三個角度分析二者的差異。第三章為“敘事視角比較”,從敘事視角的選擇與運用角度來分析二者的異同,即全知敘事視角、限知敘事視角和多重敘事視角。結語部分指出這兩種小說進行比較的重要性及意義。
[Abstract]:The novels of the Ming and Qing dynasties and the English Goths in the 18 th century are all about the creation of ghosts. Ghosts are the product of imagination and fiction. Chinese and British literature about ghosts is very rich. This kind of novel creation is a fictional stylistic form of reality. When the novel style is used to express the ghost image, the double virtual structure will create a kind of free imagination space. The novels of Ming and Qing dynasties and English Goths in the 18th century belong to a subcategory in the history of literature and are in a marginal position. Since 1980 s, there has been a rising upsurge in the study of Gothic novels in England. Influenced by the previous political standards and reading thinking patterns, the translation, introduction and research of Gothic novels in China is not enough, and the domestic readers are still very strange to them. Although some commentators have made a new interpretation and interpretation of the novels of the Ming and Qing dynasties, their horizons are mostly confined to the national literature, lack of a worldwide vision from the perspective of comparative literature, and rarely look at its important value and significance from the perspective of the world. From the perspective of comparison and on the basis of analyzing the representative works, this paper discusses the similarities and differences between the two in narrative art (narrative space, narrative time, narrative perspective), so as to highlight their common aesthetic characteristics and their uniqueness and value. This paper is divided into five parts. In the introduction part, the author summarizes the strange novels and goth novels, and points out the comparability between them. The first chapter is the comparison of narrative space, which holds that both of them use realistic and illusory space narration, which can produce grotesque and scary aesthetic effects, but they are different from each other. The second chapter is the comparison of narrative time, which analyzes the differences between the two from the three angles of narration, flashback and pre-narration. The third chapter is the comparison of narrative perspectives, which analyzes the similarities and differences between them from the perspective of choice and application of narrative perspectives, that is, omniscience narrative perspective, limited narrative perspective and multiple narrative perspectives. The conclusion part points out the importance and significance of the comparison between the two novels.
【學位授予單位】：貴州師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：I106.4;I0-03
本文編號：2503384
[Abstract]:The novels of the Ming and Qing dynasties and the English Goths in the 18 th century are all about the creation of ghosts. Ghosts are the product of imagination and fiction. Chinese and British literature about ghosts is very rich. This kind of novel creation is a fictional stylistic form of reality. When the novel style is used to express the ghost image, the double virtual structure will create a kind of free imagination space. The novels of Ming and Qing dynasties and English Goths in the 18th century belong to a subcategory in the history of literature and are in a marginal position. Since 1980 s, there has been a rising upsurge in the study of Gothic novels in England. Influenced by the previous political standards and reading thinking patterns, the translation, introduction and research of Gothic novels in China is not enough, and the domestic readers are still very strange to them. Although some commentators have made a new interpretation and interpretation of the novels of the Ming and Qing dynasties, their horizons are mostly confined to the national literature, lack of a worldwide vision from the perspective of comparative literature, and rarely look at its important value and significance from the perspective of the world. From the perspective of comparison and on the basis of analyzing the representative works, this paper discusses the similarities and differences between the two in narrative art (narrative space, narrative time, narrative perspective), so as to highlight their common aesthetic characteristics and their uniqueness and value. This paper is divided into five parts. In the introduction part, the author summarizes the strange novels and goth novels, and points out the comparability between them. The first chapter is the comparison of narrative space, which holds that both of them use realistic and illusory space narration, which can produce grotesque and scary aesthetic effects, but they are different from each other. The second chapter is the comparison of narrative time, which analyzes the differences between the two from the three angles of narration, flashback and pre-narration. The third chapter is the comparison of narrative perspectives, which analyzes the similarities and differences between them from the perspective of choice and application of narrative perspectives, that is, omniscience narrative perspective, limited narrative perspective and multiple narrative perspectives. The conclusion part points out the importance and significance of the comparison between the two novels.
【學位授予單位】：貴州師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：I106.4;I0-03
【相似文獻】
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 孔聰;明清志怪小說和18世紀英國哥特小說敘事藝術比較研究[D];貴州師范大學;2009年
，本文編號：2503384
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2503384.html
