論朗吉努斯“崇高”視域下的藝術(shù)“想象”
[Abstract]:Langinus absorbed the imagination concept of epistemological category in the field of ancient Greek philosophy, combined with the opportunity of the development of rhetoric of eloquence, and reexamined and defined artistic imagination from the angle of literary rhetoric in on loftiness. He regards imagination as the ability of poets and orators to present images in language, and regards it as an important way to construct the noble style of literature and art. From the perspective of "sublime", imagination and creative subject advocate the great idea, look up to the thought of truth and sincere and strong feelings. The involvement of imagination makes literature and art present a "poetic truth" and broaden its aesthetic dimension, thus arousing the emotion of readers and listeners. This classical thought turned artistic creation into a process of expression based on readers' response, which laid a foundation for the further exploration of the concept of imagination in literary theory.
【作者單位】: 上海交通大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院;
【基金】:國家社會科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(13BWW054)
【分類號】:I0
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 何偉文;;論朗吉努斯《論崇高》中關(guān)于藝術(shù)家的思想[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年04期
2 許家進(jìn);;重新挖掘朗吉努斯崇高理論對當(dāng)今文學(xué)活動的積極意義[J];時代文學(xué)(下半月);2012年03期
3 許家進(jìn);;從文學(xué)文體學(xué)角度談后現(xiàn)代理論對朗吉努斯崇高理論的解構(gòu)[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年04期
4 王在衡;;《論崇高》初探[J];昆明師專學(xué)報;1989年04期
5 田英華;;朗吉努斯、博克、康德論崇高[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2007年06期
6 張萍,劉世生;試論朗吉努斯的美學(xué)理論對現(xiàn)代文學(xué)文體學(xué)的影響[J];清華大學(xué)教育研究;2003年S1期
7 許家進(jìn);;中國唐代古文家與古希臘朗吉努斯的文道觀比較[J];山花;2011年18期
8 方錫球;歷代“崇高”論的藝術(shù)形態(tài)學(xué)意義[J];安慶師院社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;1996年01期
9 張世英;從朗吉努斯的《論崇高》看屈原的《離騷》[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期
10 呂滿金;;淺談《論崇高》產(chǎn)生的文化背景[J];文學(xué)界(理論版);2010年10期
,本文編號:2373971
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2373971.html