倫理批評的重新界定
發(fā)布時間:2018-11-07 08:47
【摘要】:作為一種批評理論和批評方法,倫理批評經(jīng)歷了提出、興起、繁榮、衰落、復興、再發(fā)展的過程。二十世紀八十年代是其發(fā)展過程的分界線。在此之前,其繁榮表現(xiàn)在文學倫理學研究的蓬勃發(fā)展;在此之后,其復興首先表現(xiàn)在對其定義的重新界定。此次的復興不是道德批評的重申,而是倫理批評的進一步發(fā)展,并由此演變出了以韋恩·布斯和瑪莎·努斯鮑曼為代表的新人文主義倫理批評和以希利斯·米勒為代表的解構主義倫理批評。二十一世紀初,中國學者聶珍釗也提出了中國的文學倫理學批評并逐步完善,使之成為具有系統(tǒng)理論框架和批評術語的批評方法。
[Abstract]:As a critical theory and method, ethical criticism has experienced the process of putting forward, rising, flourishing, declining, reviving and redeveloping. The 1980's was the dividing line of its development process. Before that, its prosperity was manifested in the vigorous development of literary ethics research; after that, its revival first manifested in the redefinition of its definition. This revival is not a reaffirmation of moral criticism, but a further development of ethical criticism. And thus evolved the new humanistic ethical criticism represented by Wayne Booth and Marsha Nussbauman and the deconstruction ethical criticism represented by Hillis Hans Muller. At the beginning of the 21 century, the Chinese scholar Nie Zhenzhao also put forward the criticism of Chinese literary ethics and gradually perfected it, making it a criticism method with systematic theoretical framework and critical terminology.
【作者單位】: 華中農業(yè)大學外國語學院;
【基金】:國家社科基金項目“美國倫理批評的歷時發(fā)展及其演變研究”(編號:12CWW004) 中央高;究蒲袠I(yè)務費專項資金資助項目“西方倫理批評的復興及其在21世紀的新發(fā)展”(編號:2662015PY215)
【分類號】:I0-05
本文編號:2315824
[Abstract]:As a critical theory and method, ethical criticism has experienced the process of putting forward, rising, flourishing, declining, reviving and redeveloping. The 1980's was the dividing line of its development process. Before that, its prosperity was manifested in the vigorous development of literary ethics research; after that, its revival first manifested in the redefinition of its definition. This revival is not a reaffirmation of moral criticism, but a further development of ethical criticism. And thus evolved the new humanistic ethical criticism represented by Wayne Booth and Marsha Nussbauman and the deconstruction ethical criticism represented by Hillis Hans Muller. At the beginning of the 21 century, the Chinese scholar Nie Zhenzhao also put forward the criticism of Chinese literary ethics and gradually perfected it, making it a criticism method with systematic theoretical framework and critical terminology.
【作者單位】: 華中農業(yè)大學外國語學院;
【基金】:國家社科基金項目“美國倫理批評的歷時發(fā)展及其演變研究”(編號:12CWW004) 中央高;究蒲袠I(yè)務費專項資金資助項目“西方倫理批評的復興及其在21世紀的新發(fā)展”(編號:2662015PY215)
【分類號】:I0-05
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前7條
1 楊革新;;文學研究的倫理轉向與美國倫理批評的復興[J];外國文學研究;2013年06期
2 段俊暉;;倫理批評的2種范式——列維納斯的倫理形而上學與哈貝馬斯的話語倫理學[J];重慶工學院學報(社會科學版);2008年04期
3 楊紅旗;;文學倫理批評的重建危機與內在理路[J];西華師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年03期
4 ;In the Remains of Theory:Ethical Criticism in Contemporary Literary Studies[J];Comparative Literature:East & West;2010年01期
5 凌海衡;藝術的倫理批評與審美批評[J];文藝研究;2003年06期
6 陳后亮;;倫理學轉向[J];外國文學;2014年04期
7 ;[J];;年期
,本文編號:2315824
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2315824.html