【摘要】：自新批評以來,歷經(jīng)結(jié)構(gòu)主義和后結(jié)構(gòu)主義思潮沖擊,作者"意圖"在文本闡釋中的重要性早已今非昔比。在西方文論關(guān)于這個概念的論爭似乎已告一段落之際,張江先生重提作者"意圖"可以看作對其前期提出的"強制闡釋"論的繼續(xù)和深化,他希望這個概念可以成為文本闡釋合理疆域劃分的一個標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。但文章卻對此存疑,我們認(rèn)為張江先生對作者意圖的界定仍帶有一定的西方傳統(tǒng)理性主體特點,如此界定的這個概念并不能對新批評和結(jié)構(gòu)主義等學(xué)派的質(zhì)疑構(gòu)成有效回應(yīng)。文章將從作者"意圖"的定義、其與闡釋過程的關(guān)系以及其作為闡釋標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的可行性三個方面論證這個概念對文學(xué)批評指導(dǎo)作用的有限性。
[Abstract]:Since the new criticism, with the impact of structuralism and post-structuralism, the significance of the author's intention in the interpretation of the text has long been different. At a time when the debate on this concept in western literary theory seems to have come to an end, Mr. Zhang Jiang's restatement of the author's "intention" can be seen as the continuation and deepening of his earlier "compulsory interpretation" theory. He hopes that this concept can be used as a standard for the text to explain the rational division of territory. However, there is doubt in the article. We think that Mr. Zhang Jiang's definition of the author's intention still has certain characteristics of the western traditional rational subject, and this concept can not effectively respond to the doubts of the new criticism and structuralism. This paper will demonstrate the limitation of the concept to the guidance of literary criticism from three aspects: the definition of the author's intention, its relationship with the process of interpretation and its feasibility as a standard of interpretation.
【作者單位】： 上海外國語大學(xué)英語學(xué)院;
【分類號】：I06

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 龐弘;;從“心靈共鳴”到“反對理論”——作者意圖理論的三條路徑[J];國外文學(xué);2013年01期

2 龐弘;;作者意圖重構(gòu)與“客觀性”追問——赫施意圖論解釋學(xué)的語境維度[J];北方論叢;2013年04期

3 灻承元;龐璃;;作者意圖理論再探[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2008年05期

4 方克平;熊煥平;;隱微理論與作者意圖批評理論[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 趙巍;;版本差別與作者意圖——《紅樓夢》“抄檢大觀園”的英譯本比較研究[A];中國英漢語比較研究會第八次全國學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文摘要匯編[C];2008年

，

本文編號：2244188