發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-02 21:15

  本文選題：浪漫愛 + 諸眾愛��； 參考：《上海大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：通過對巴丟、哈特與奈格里關(guān)于愛和政治的論述進(jìn)行批判性考察,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)巴丟對兩個(gè)人之間的浪漫愛的論述并不能為共產(chǎn)主義政治奠定基礎(chǔ),相反會消解政治;而哈特和奈格里對諸眾愛的論述因?yàn)槿狈橙说囊曇岸蔀橐环N無力的政治。通過施米特和墨菲重新引入"敵友區(qū)分"問題,將敵與友的生成過程展現(xiàn)為一種巴特勒式的政治表演,并將愛理解為相互影響和感染的情感,可提出一種納入敵人視角的表演之愛,真正激活愛和政治之間的鏈接。
[Abstract]:Through a critical investigation of Baltius, Hart and Negory's discourse on love and politics, it can be found that Baltius's discussion of romantic love between two people can not lay the foundation for communist politics, on the contrary, it will dispel politics. Hart and Nigri's discourse on the love of the masses became a weak politics because of the lack of vision of the enemy. Through Schmitt and Murphy's re-introduction of the "enemy and friend distinction" issue, the generation of enemies and friends is presented as an Butler's political performance, and love is understood as mutual influence and affection. You can propose a show of love that incorporates an enemy perspective that truly activates the link between love and politics.
【作者單位】： 天津工業(yè)大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院;華南師范大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目(14ZDB087)
【分類號】：I0-05
，

本文編號：1970225