本文選題：癥候 + 癥候式閱讀　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 阿爾都塞在《讀＜資本論＞》中提出了“癥候式閱讀”這一具有創(chuàng)新性和革命性的閱讀方法和文本解讀理論,這一方法在科學(xué)解讀馬克思思想過程中發(fā)揮了巨大作用,也對文學(xué)批評產(chǎn)生了重要影響。緣于阿爾都塞“癥候式閱讀”對精神分析學(xué)相關(guān)概念的借鑒和吸收,目前的文學(xué)研究領(lǐng)域?qū)τ凇鞍Y候式閱讀”的概念使用存在著混亂的現(xiàn)象,往往將之與精神分析學(xué)的心理批評混為一談,從而遮蔽了阿爾都塞理論的準(zhǔn)確內(nèi)涵,影響了對之的深層闡釋和吸收借鑒。本論文旨在對“癥候式閱讀”理論做一番追根溯源的梳理,挖掘它的原初內(nèi)涵,追蹤它在文學(xué)論域中的遷變,考證其適用性,以澄清目前國內(nèi)學(xué)術(shù)界對這一理論的混用狀態(tài),以資將這一思想整合梳理,更好地運用于文學(xué)批評領(lǐng)域。 本文共分引言、主體、結(jié)語三部分。引言部分是對本文所論述問題的介紹,指出之所以要對“癥候式閱讀”進行考察其源流變遷的必要性,重在說明“癥候式閱讀”作為一種文學(xué)解讀方法的價值所在。 論文主體部分共分五章。第一章“弗洛伊德對‘癥候'的論述”力圖闡釋清楚弗洛伊德提出的“癥候”概念,因為阿爾都塞從弗洛伊德那里借鑒了這個概念,雖從字面上顯示出了淵源所自,但內(nèi)涵卻已發(fā)生很大改變,這恰恰成為“癥候式閱讀”遭到誤讀的根源所在。通過對癥候的本質(zhì)、癥候的形成條件及意義揭示它作為一種被壓抑的無意識欲望的替代和表征的涵義。第二章“拉康的語言無意識和癥候”重在闡釋拉康賦予語言維度的無意識及作為其表征的癥候。無意識是語言的產(chǎn)物又具有語言的結(jié)構(gòu),癥候在拉康這里成為一種語言的能指和無意識的隱喻,正是能指間的替代和無限運動產(chǎn)生了意義。第三章“阿爾都塞的總問題‘癥候式閱讀'”旨在深入闡述阿爾都塞的“癥候式閱讀”的理論內(nèi)涵�！鞍Y候式閱讀”要求從文本的空白、沉默和斷裂等癥候入手,找出隱在的總問題框架和結(jié)構(gòu)。所以從“總問題”的闡述入手,剖析他將認識看作生產(chǎn)的思想,分析阿爾都塞對理論文章如何進行癥候閱讀,最后通過他對文學(xué)文本的解析,看他如何抓住癥候揭穿文本中意識形態(tài)的欺騙性,從而得到一種方法的啟示。第四章“馬歇雷的意識形態(tài)‘癥候式閱讀'”通過分析馬歇雷具體的文學(xué)批評實踐,考察其是如何將“癥候式分析”運用于具體的文學(xué)批評實踐。他的“文學(xué)生產(chǎn)理論”就是將文學(xué)看成對意識形態(tài)的生產(chǎn),文本中的沉默、空白、矛盾就是產(chǎn)生于意識形態(tài)的作用。不在場和沉默就是意識形態(tài)的癥候,文學(xué)批評或者說癥候式閱讀就是生產(chǎn)出作品中不在場的意識形態(tài)。第五章“癥候式閱讀與文學(xué)批評”重在總結(jié)梳理“癥候式閱讀”作為一種文學(xué)批評方法所包含著的相應(yīng)的文學(xué)觀念和對文本的獨特規(guī)定�！鞍Y候式閱讀”與傳統(tǒng)的形形色色的文學(xué)反映論和創(chuàng)造論劃清界限,而視文學(xué)是一種生產(chǎn),一種建構(gòu)�！鞍Y候式閱讀”批判了傳統(tǒng)的有機整體的文本觀,認為文本是一種存在沉默、空白和矛盾的結(jié)構(gòu)體。在具體的文學(xué)文本批評實踐中,“癥候式閱讀”可以是對作者或者作品中人物的無意識分析,也可以從創(chuàng)作主體與時代主流之間存在的裂隙和錯位中顯示意識形態(tài)對文學(xué)的滲入和控制。 結(jié)語部分是對作為文學(xué)批評方法的“癥候式閱讀”所存在問題的總結(jié)和探討,“癥候式閱讀”還需要更深入的挖掘和闡釋。
[Abstract]:Al Du Jose put forward "symptomatic reading", an innovative and revolutionary reading method and text interpretation theory, which has played a great role in the scientific interpretation of Marx's thought and has an important influence on literary criticism. It is due to Al Du Jose's "symptomatic reading" to the spirit. In the field of literature research, there are confusion phenomena in the use of the concept of "symptomatic reading" in the field of literature research, which often confuses it with psychoanalytic psychological criticism, which obscured the exact connotation of Al Du Jose's theory and influenced the deep interpretation and absorption of it. The theory of "symptomatic reading" is traced back to the root of the theory, to excavate its original connotation, to trace its change in the literary field, to examine its applicability, to clarify the mixed state of the current domestic academia on this theory, so as to integrate this idea into the field of literary criticism.
This article is divided into three parts: the introduction, the main body and the conclusion. The introduction part is the introduction of the problems discussed in this article, and points out the necessity of examining the "symptomatic reading" of its origin, and emphasizing the value of "symptomatic reading" as a literary interpretation method.
The main part of the thesis is divided into five chapters. The first chapter, "Freud's discussion of 'symptomatic', tries to clarify the concept of" symptomatic "proposed by Freud, because Al Du Jose has learned from Freud the concept. Although it has literally shown its origin, the connotation has changed greatly, which is just a" symptom ". The root of "reading" is misread. Through the essence of the syndrome, the forming conditions and the meaning of the symptom, it reveals the meaning of the substitution and characterization of a depressed and unconscious desire. The second chapter, "Lacan's language unconsciousness and symptoms", emphasizes the unconscious of Lacan's language dimension and the symptom of its representation. Consciousness is the product of language and the structure of language. The symptom is that Lacan is a metaphorical and unconscious metaphor in Lacan. It is the substitution of the interfinger and the meaning of infinite movement. In the third chapter, "symptomatic reading" of Al Du Jose's general problem is intended to elaborate on the theory of Al Du Jose's "symptomatic reading" in depth. Culvert. "Symptomatic reading" requires from the blank, silence and fracture of the text to find out the general framework and structure of the hidden problems, so from the exposition of "the general problem", the idea of his understanding of knowledge as production is analyzed, and how Al Du Jose's symptomatic reading of the theoretical article is analyzed, and finally through his interpretation of literary texts, The fourth chapter of Machere's ideology 'symptomatic reading' examines how the "symptomatic analysis" is used in specific literary criticism practice by analyzing the concrete literary criticism of Ma Lei. His "Literature". The theory of production is to think of literature as the production of ideology. The silence, blank, and contradiction in the text are the role of ideology. Absence and silence are the symptoms of ideology. Literary criticism or symptomatic reading is the ideology that is not present in the production. The fifth chapter "symptomatic reading and Literature" "Criticism" focuses on summarizing the corresponding literary ideas and unique provisions contained in the "symptomatic reading" as a literary criticism method. "Symptomatic reading" has a clear line with the traditional literary theory of literature and creativity, while literature is a production, a construction. "Symptomatic reading" criticism. In the practice of literary text criticism, the "symptomatic reading" can be an unconscious analysis of the author or the characters in the works, and can also show the meaning of the crevice and dislocation between the creative subject and the mainstream of the times. The infiltration and control of literature by the form of knowledge.
The concluding part is the summary and discussion of the problems of "symptomatic reading" as a literary criticism method, and "symptomatic reading" needs to be further excavated and explained.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：I06

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 邵卉;朱大可文學(xué)批評的研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2011年

2 劉玉慧;文學(xué)誤讀與中學(xué)語文閱讀策略研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1862439