本文選題：克爾凱郭爾 + 生存境界��； 參考：《河北大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 克爾凱郭爾是丹麥十九世紀著名基督教神學家、存在主義思想偉大先驅,他一生論著豐贍,理論與思想成果頗豐,涉及多個學科以及領域,他的反諷概念就是其中較為獨特且具有開創(chuàng)性的理論�？藸杽P郭爾通過對色諾芬、柏拉圖以及阿里斯托芬的文本分析與解讀,還原了蘇格拉底的原始形象,并挖掘其背后生存的立場,借此對反諷做了概念化的解析,并認為反諷概念的實質就是蘇格拉底的生存立場。 據(jù)此論述并結合他的生存境界論,克氏反諷概念可被界定為生存性反諷,而且它不只單純的局限于概念化解析,而且延伸到了克爾凱郭爾的生存哲學中。在生存三境界中,反諷完成了跨越與超越,貫通了生存三境界,承載著克爾凱郭爾對人的生存的思考與他的宗教理想�？耸溪毺氐姆粗S概念也就使這個古老理論具備了相對新穎的特征,即實踐性、個體性、主觀性、否定性以及宗教性等。生存性反諷在理論方面雖然具有很大的開創(chuàng)性,但也并非克爾凱郭爾獨創(chuàng),它與其他的反諷理論有著密切的聯(lián)系。經過比較分析,生存性反諷與傳統(tǒng)修辭學意義上的古典反諷有著傳承關系,對它是在生存立場角度上的繼承與深化;同時也受到德國浪漫派的反諷理論的影響,但對浪漫反諷持批判態(tài)度,并在批判中有所超越;與后來的新批評反諷是相互對立的關系,但從另一種角度上說卻是一種主觀性、個體性的有益補充。 總之,生存性反諷幾乎擺脫了文本的局限及其對反諷的束縛,不流于對現(xiàn)象的簡單描述,強調反諷的主觀性與個體性,深入開掘了文本背后的態(tài)度與立場,使反諷由文本層面跨越到人的生存層面,更加接近反諷的本源、更加直接與純粹、更具有概括性。這對于文學批評中對文本的解讀具有一定的啟示意義,而克爾凱郭爾對蘇格拉底的解析實際上就是很好的范本。但是,生存性反諷對于主觀性、個體性的過分強調,對生存層面的意蘊過度開掘,從而造成了對文本層面的忽略,使得生存性反諷理論不乏牽強附會之處,這也不免顯得極端與片面。
[Abstract]:Kerr Kay Gol was a famous Christian theologian in Denmark in the nineteenth Century, a great pioneer of existentialism. His life was rich and rich in theory and thought, involving many disciplines and fields. His ironic concept was a more unique and pioneering theory. Kerr Kay Gol passed Xenophon, Platon, and Ali. The text analysis and interpretation of stonen restores the original image of Socrates, and excavates the standpoint of his existence, and analyzes the irony conceptually, and thinks that the essence of the irony concept is the Socrates' standpoint of survival.
According to this, the Kirschner irony concept can be defined as a survivability irony, and it is not only limited to conceptual analysis, but also extends to Kerr Kay Gol's philosophy of existence. In the three realm of existence, irony completes the crossing and transcendence, through the three realm of survival, and carries the Kerr Kay Gol pair. The thought of human existence and his religious ideals. The Kirschner's unique irony concept also makes this old theory relatively novel features, namely, practicality, individuality, subjectivity, negativity, and religion. Although existential irony has great originality in theory, it is not original Kerr Kay Gol, it is with the others. The theory of irony has a close relationship. After comparative analysis, the existential irony has inherited and deepened the classical irony in the traditional rhetoric. It is also influenced by the irony theory of the German Romantics, but has a critical attitude to the irony and surpassed the criticism. It is opposite to the later criticism and irony, but from another angle it is a subjective and beneficial supplement of individuality.
In a word, the existential irony almost gets rid of the limitations of the text and the shackles of irony. It does not flow to a simple description of the phenomenon, emphasizes the subjectivity and individuality of the irony, deeply excavate the attitude and position behind the text, and make irony from the text level to the human survival level, more close to the source of irony, more direct and pure, more pure, more pure. It has a generality. This has some enlightenment to the interpretation of text in literary criticism, and Kerr Kay Gol's analysis of Socrates is actually a good model. However, the existential irony is too much emphasis on subjectivity, individuality and the meaning of survival level, thus resulting in the neglect of the text level. It makes the irony theory of existence irrelevant and unavoidable.

【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：I0

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 馮文坤;論T·S·艾略特的“非個人化”詩學理論[J];外國文學研究;2003年02期

2 李輝源,李云雀;克爾凱郭爾的“生存三領域”理論[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社科版);2005年10期

3 張玉能;德國早期浪漫派的美學原則[J];廈門大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年06期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 臧運峰;新批評反諷及其現(xiàn)代神話[D];北京師范大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1840152