本文選題：克爾凱郭爾 + 生存境界��； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 克爾凱郭爾是丹麥?zhǔn)攀兰o(jì)著名基督教神學(xué)家、存在主義思想偉大先驅(qū),他一生論著豐贍,理論與思想成果頗豐,涉及多個(gè)學(xué)科以及領(lǐng)域,他的反諷概念就是其中較為獨(dú)特且具有開(kāi)創(chuàng)性的理論。克爾凱郭爾通過(guò)對(duì)色諾芬、柏拉圖以及阿里斯托芬的文本分析與解讀,還原了蘇格拉底的原始形象,并挖掘其背后生存的立場(chǎng),借此對(duì)反諷做了概念化的解析,并認(rèn)為反諷概念的實(shí)質(zhì)就是蘇格拉底的生存立場(chǎng)。 據(jù)此論述并結(jié)合他的生存境界論,克氏反諷概念可被界定為生存性反諷,而且它不只單純的局限于概念化解析,而且延伸到了克爾凱郭爾的生存哲學(xué)中。在生存三境界中,反諷完成了跨越與超越,貫通了生存三境界,承載著克爾凱郭爾對(duì)人的生存的思考與他的宗教理想�？耸溪�(dú)特的反諷概念也就使這個(gè)古老理論具備了相對(duì)新穎的特征,即實(shí)踐性、個(gè)體性、主觀性、否定性以及宗教性等。生存性反諷在理論方面雖然具有很大的開(kāi)創(chuàng)性,但也并非克爾凱郭爾獨(dú)創(chuàng),它與其他的反諷理論有著密切的聯(lián)系。經(jīng)過(guò)比較分析,生存性反諷與傳統(tǒng)修辭學(xué)意義上的古典反諷有著傳承關(guān)系,對(duì)它是在生存立場(chǎng)角度上的繼承與深化;同時(shí)也受到德國(guó)浪漫派的反諷理論的影響,但對(duì)浪漫反諷持批判態(tài)度,并在批判中有所超越;與后來(lái)的新批評(píng)反諷是相互對(duì)立的關(guān)系,但從另一種角度上說(shuō)卻是一種主觀性、個(gè)體性的有益補(bǔ)充。 總之,生存性反諷幾乎擺脫了文本的局限及其對(duì)反諷的束縛,不流于對(duì)現(xiàn)象的簡(jiǎn)單描述,強(qiáng)調(diào)反諷的主觀性與個(gè)體性,深入開(kāi)掘了文本背后的態(tài)度與立場(chǎng),使反諷由文本層面跨越到人的生存層面,更加接近反諷的本源、更加直接與純粹、更具有概括性。這對(duì)于文學(xué)批評(píng)中對(duì)文本的解讀具有一定的啟示意義,而克爾凱郭爾對(duì)蘇格拉底的解析實(shí)際上就是很好的范本。但是,生存性反諷對(duì)于主觀性、個(gè)體性的過(guò)分強(qiáng)調(diào),對(duì)生存層面的意蘊(yùn)過(guò)度開(kāi)掘,從而造成了對(duì)文本層面的忽略,使得生存性反諷理論不乏牽強(qiáng)附會(huì)之處,這也不免顯得極端與片面。
[Abstract]:Kerr Kay Gol was a famous Christian theologian in Denmark in the nineteenth Century, a great pioneer of existentialism. His life was rich and rich in theory and thought, involving many disciplines and fields. His ironic concept was a more unique and pioneering theory. Kerr Kay Gol passed Xenophon, Platon, and Ali. The text analysis and interpretation of stonen restores the original image of Socrates, and excavates the standpoint of his existence, and analyzes the irony conceptually, and thinks that the essence of the irony concept is the Socrates' standpoint of survival.
According to this, the Kirschner irony concept can be defined as a survivability irony, and it is not only limited to conceptual analysis, but also extends to Kerr Kay Gol's philosophy of existence. In the three realm of existence, irony completes the crossing and transcendence, through the three realm of survival, and carries the Kerr Kay Gol pair. The thought of human existence and his religious ideals. The Kirschner's unique irony concept also makes this old theory relatively novel features, namely, practicality, individuality, subjectivity, negativity, and religion. Although existential irony has great originality in theory, it is not original Kerr Kay Gol, it is with the others. The theory of irony has a close relationship. After comparative analysis, the existential irony has inherited and deepened the classical irony in the traditional rhetoric. It is also influenced by the irony theory of the German Romantics, but has a critical attitude to the irony and surpassed the criticism. It is opposite to the later criticism and irony, but from another angle it is a subjective and beneficial supplement of individuality.
In a word, the existential irony almost gets rid of the limitations of the text and the shackles of irony. It does not flow to a simple description of the phenomenon, emphasizes the subjectivity and individuality of the irony, deeply excavate the attitude and position behind the text, and make irony from the text level to the human survival level, more close to the source of irony, more direct and pure, more pure, more pure. It has a generality. This has some enlightenment to the interpretation of text in literary criticism, and Kerr Kay Gol's analysis of Socrates is actually a good model. However, the existential irony is too much emphasis on subjectivity, individuality and the meaning of survival level, thus resulting in the neglect of the text level. It makes the irony theory of existence irrelevant and unavoidable.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 馮文坤;論T·S·艾略特的“非個(gè)人化”詩(shī)學(xué)理論[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)研究;2003年02期

2 李輝源,李云雀;克爾凱郭爾的“生存三領(lǐng)域”理論[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年10期

3 張玉能;德國(guó)早期浪漫派的美學(xué)原則[J];廈門(mén)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 臧運(yùn)峰;新批評(píng)反諷及其現(xiàn)代神話[D];北京師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1840152