本文關(guān)鍵詞：克萊門(mén)茨《大學(xué)比較文學(xué)》研究　出處：《廣西師范學(xué)院》2010年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 羅伯特·克萊門(mén)茨 比較文學(xué) 學(xué)科理論 學(xué)科實(shí)踐

【摘要】：19世紀(jì)末起,比較文學(xué)作為一門(mén)獨(dú)立的學(xué)科進(jìn)入大學(xué)學(xué)堂,逐漸成為國(guó)際學(xué)界討論的熱點(diǎn)�；仡櫛容^文學(xué)發(fā)展史,關(guān)于比較文學(xué)學(xué)科理論的研究多不勝數(shù),而大學(xué)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)實(shí)踐的研究則較少。鑒于世界各地的高校紛紛開(kāi)設(shè)比較文學(xué)課程的趨勢(shì),有關(guān)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)的研究則顯得尤為重要。美國(guó)學(xué)者羅伯特·克萊門(mén)茨的《大學(xué)比較文學(xué):原則、實(shí)踐、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之闡述》是研究比較文學(xué)學(xué)科建立和發(fā)展的優(yōu)秀論著。此書(shū)的實(shí)用參考價(jià)值受到美國(guó)學(xué)界雷納·韋勒克等知名學(xué)者的好評(píng)。 《大學(xué)比較文學(xué)》是克萊門(mén)茨結(jié)合美國(guó)學(xué)界關(guān)于比較文學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)的權(quán)威文件和多年掌管比較文學(xué)系所積累的豐富教學(xué)和教學(xué)管理經(jīng)驗(yàn)而成的心血之作。全書(shū)以大學(xué)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)為核心串引內(nèi)容,渾然一體,獨(dú)立成體系。克萊門(mén)茨首先從比較文學(xué)學(xué)科理論談起,立論客觀。繼而他從比較文學(xué)教學(xué)和教學(xué)管理兩方面探討如何建立和管理比較文學(xué)系,總結(jié)一些可行的原則、慣例和標(biāo)準(zhǔn),論述全面地照顧到大學(xué)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科實(shí)踐工作的方方面面�？巳R門(mén)茨是一位治學(xué)嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)谋容^文學(xué)學(xué)者,此書(shū)呈現(xiàn)出比較文學(xué)學(xué)科觀念公允,學(xué)科建設(shè)主張豐富而具體可行,論述照顧到各層面閱讀需求等特點(diǎn)。 自1980年以來(lái),中國(guó)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科也得到長(zhǎng)足的發(fā)展,我們的學(xué)者密切關(guān)注著中國(guó)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)的未來(lái)�？巳R門(mén)茨的代表作問(wèn)世后,迅速被譯介至國(guó)內(nèi),曾在中國(guó)學(xué)界產(chǎn)生一定影響,最顯著的例子是香港比較文學(xué)學(xué)者李達(dá)三對(duì)此書(shū)的推崇。作為一本備受肯定的比較文學(xué)學(xué)科發(fā)展研究專(zhuān)著,通過(guò)深入分析,我們能從中挖掘出不少為國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者借鑒的價(jià)值。一是借鑒克萊門(mén)茨如何弘揚(yáng)和豐富比較文學(xué)學(xué)科文化,推進(jìn)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科理論體系的發(fā)展;二是借鑒他如何把自己的學(xué)科理論認(rèn)識(shí)貫徹在大學(xué)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科建立和建設(shè)的實(shí)踐工作中。《大學(xué)比較文學(xué)》是一本資訊豐富的實(shí)用書(shū)籍,我們能在研讀中借鑒作者的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn),營(yíng)造中國(guó)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科文化,為我國(guó)大學(xué)比較文學(xué)學(xué)科的穩(wěn)健發(fā)展指引航向。
[Abstract]:Since the end of 19th century, comparative literature, as an independent subject, has been a hot topic in international academic circles. Reviewing the history of comparative literature, there are numerous studies on the theory of comparative literature. In view of the tendency of universities all over the world to set up comparative literature courses, there is little research on the practice of the discipline construction of comparative literature in universities. The research on the subject construction of comparative literature is especially important. Robert Clements,, an American scholar, "University Comparative Literature: principles, practice". "A description of Standards" is an excellent treatise on the establishment and development of the discipline of comparative literature. The practical reference value of this book is well received by famous scholars such as Renard Willerk in the United States. Comparative University Literature is a painstaking work by Clements,, which combines with the authoritative documents of American academic circles on the subject construction of comparative literature and the rich teaching and teaching management experience accumulated by the Department of Comparative Literature for many years. The subject construction of comparative literature in universities is regarded as the core of cross-citation. Clements, begins with the theory of comparative literature and discusses the objectivity. Then he discusses how to establish and manage the department of comparative literature from two aspects: comparative literature teaching and teaching management. This paper summarizes some feasible principles, conventions and standards, and discusses the comprehensive consideration of all aspects of the practical work of the discipline of comparative literature in universities. Clements, is a rigorous comparative literature scholar. This book presents the fair concept of comparative literature, the discipline construction is rich and practical, discusses the characteristics of taking into account the reading needs of all levels. Since 1980, the discipline of comparative literature in China has also been greatly developed. Our scholars pay close attention to the future of the discipline construction of Chinese comparative literature. The rapid translation and introduction to China has had a certain impact on Chinese academic circles, the most notable example of which is the praise of Hong Kong comparative literature scholar Li Dasan, as a highly recognized monograph on the development of the discipline of comparative literature. Through in-depth analysis, we can excavate a lot of value for domestic scholars. One is how to carry forward and enrich the subject culture of comparative literature and promote the development of theoretical system of comparative literature for reference of Clements,; The second is how to learn from him how to carry out his subject theory in the practical work of the establishment and construction of the subject of comparative literature in university. University Comparative Literature is a practical book with abundant information. We can draw lessons from the author's successful experience and construct the Chinese comparative literature subject culture in order to guide the steady development of comparative literature in universities in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I0-03

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 樂(lè)黛云;比較文學(xué)的“名”與“實(shí)”——《深圳大學(xué)比較文學(xué)叢書(shū)》總序[J];深圳大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1985年03期

2 仵從巨,管恩森;現(xiàn)行比較文學(xué)本科教材問(wèn)卷調(diào)查的分析與評(píng)議[J];中國(guó)比較文學(xué);2005年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1391210