本文選題：伊格爾頓　切入點(diǎn)：政治　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2006年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：伊格爾頓是一位著名的馬克思主義文學(xué)理論家和文學(xué)批評(píng)家,他批評(píng)理論的特征和概念體系就是:意識(shí)形態(tài)政治批評(píng)。在他的學(xué)術(shù)思想歷程中,可看到伊格爾頓的意識(shí)形態(tài)政治批評(píng)理論經(jīng)歷了一個(gè)不斷發(fā)展和構(gòu)建的過(guò)程。從整體上說(shuō),伊格爾頓批評(píng)理論走了一條從文學(xué)批評(píng)逐步擴(kuò)展為文化理論研究的道路。伊格爾頓堅(jiān)持批評(píng)理論必然是為政治實(shí)際服務(wù)的,所以他的文學(xué)批評(píng)思想和文化理論始終貫穿著政治性。他的政治批評(píng)觀是由美學(xué)、政治、意識(shí)形態(tài)內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)而構(gòu)成的一個(gè)交叉網(wǎng)絡(luò),其中,意識(shí)形態(tài)是理論批評(píng)的核心,政治是這一思想網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)行的內(nèi)驅(qū)力,是來(lái)源于實(shí)踐的力量,美學(xué)的文化藝術(shù)的廣闊界面則構(gòu)成理論的張力場(chǎng)。 本文分三個(gè)部分。第一部分論述了伊格爾頓意識(shí)形態(tài)理論的發(fā)展過(guò)程。在這個(gè)過(guò)程中,伊格爾頓不斷汲取各種理論充實(shí)“意識(shí)形態(tài)”的意義,形成多個(gè)意識(shí)形態(tài)界定。從認(rèn)識(shí)論和社會(huì)學(xué)的角度來(lái)理解,他特別強(qiáng)調(diào)了“虛假意識(shí)”應(yīng)該在“無(wú)意識(shí)”所代表的強(qiáng)有力潛能的意義上被理解成一種力量,這種力量正是意識(shí)形態(tài)的實(shí)踐功能的所在。同時(shí),他把意識(shí)形態(tài)理論推進(jìn)到文學(xué)研究領(lǐng)域,認(rèn)為文學(xué)是意識(shí)形態(tài)的一部分,它具有一定的政治色彩,但同時(shí)它也是經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)的一部分,從而提出文學(xué)是審美意識(shí)形態(tài)生產(chǎn)的觀點(diǎn)。這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)的建立就改變了眾多西方馬克思主義者的文學(xué)研究方法,使馬克思主義深入文本內(nèi)部進(jìn)行研究。 第二部分論述了文學(xué)和文化中的政治批評(píng)。20世紀(jì)80年代以來(lái),由于受后結(jié)構(gòu)主義的影響,伊格爾頓的思想有所變化和發(fā)展,他更加強(qiáng)調(diào)文學(xué)批評(píng)的政治性。在以英國(guó)文學(xué)為切入點(diǎn)論述了政治批評(píng)是文學(xué)批評(píng)存在的理由和價(jià)值之后,特別指出文學(xué)中的政治性不是為某一特定的政治任務(wù)服務(wù),而是在批評(píng)中所確立的話語(yǔ)是具有意識(shí)形態(tài)、政治性的權(quán)力話語(yǔ)。從而他把政治批評(píng)的視野擴(kuò)大到整個(gè)文化,并且以文化這個(gè)宏大的視野為解析的角度,指出在這個(gè)視域中,政治批評(píng)的目的最終指向和諧的社會(huì)。 第三部分論述了審美與意識(shí)形態(tài)政治批評(píng)的關(guān)系。他以意識(shí)形態(tài)為連接政治與美學(xué)的核心話語(yǔ),美學(xué)作為一種意識(shí)形態(tài)它有內(nèi)在的規(guī)律和矛盾,但同時(shí)它又有深刻的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治及其它方面的根源。伊格爾頓還把身體、審美和政治意識(shí)形態(tài)三者聯(lián)系起來(lái),認(rèn)為身體是意識(shí)形態(tài)和審美活動(dòng)的基礎(chǔ)和中介,意識(shí)形態(tài)和審美活動(dòng)對(duì)身體具有構(gòu)建作用,而審美觀念的構(gòu)建同時(shí)又對(duì)意識(shí)形態(tài)形成挑戰(zhàn)。在相互復(fù)雜的關(guān)系中,伊格爾頓從現(xiàn)代美學(xué)發(fā)生發(fā)展的社會(huì)條件、審美的內(nèi)在復(fù)雜性和審美的基
[Abstract]:Eagleton is a famous Marxist literary theorist and literary critic. The characteristics and conceptual system of his criticism theory are ideological and political criticism. It can be seen that Eagleton's theory of ideological political criticism has gone through a process of continuous development and construction. Eagleton's criticism theory has taken a path from literary criticism to cultural theory research. Eagleton insists that criticism theory is bound to serve political practice. So his thought of literary criticism and his theory of culture always run through politics. His view of political criticism is a cross network composed of aesthetics, politics and ideology, in which ideology is the core of theoretical criticism. Politics is the internal driving force of the operation of this ideological network and the strength of practice. The broad interface of aesthetic culture and art constitutes the tension field of the theory. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part discusses the development process of Eagleton's ideology theory. In this process, Eagleton constantly absorbs various theories to enrich the meaning of "ideology". From the perspective of epistemology and sociology, he emphasizes that "false consciousness" should be understood as a force in the sense of the powerful potential represented by "unconscious". This force is precisely where the practical function of ideology lies. At the same time, he pushed the theory of ideology into the field of literary research, thinking that literature is a part of ideology and that it has a certain political color. But at the same time, it is also part of the economic foundation, thus putting forward the viewpoint that literature is the production of aesthetic ideology. The establishment of this viewpoint has changed the literary research methods of many Western Marxists. Make Marxism research deeply inside the text. The second part discusses the political criticism in literature and culture. Since the 1980s, Eagleton's thought has changed and developed due to the influence of post-structuralism. He emphasized the political nature of literary criticism. After discussing that political criticism is the reason and value of literary criticism, he pointed out in particular that the political nature in literature does not serve a particular political task. Instead, the discourse established in the criticism is an ideological and political discourse of power. Thus, he extends the perspective of political criticism to the whole culture, and points out that in this field of view, from the perspective of the grand vision of culture, The aim of political criticism is ultimately directed towards a harmonious society. The third part discusses the relationship between aesthetics and ideological political criticism. He regards ideology as the core discourse linking politics and aesthetics. As an ideology, aesthetics has its inherent laws and contradictions, but it also has a profound economy. Eagleton also links the body, aesthetics and political ideology, and thinks that the body is the basis and intermediary of ideology and aesthetic activity, and ideology and aesthetic activity have the function of structuring the body. At the same time, the construction of aesthetic concept challenges ideology. In the complex relationship between each other, Eagleton develops from the social conditions of modern aesthetics, aesthetic inherent complexity and aesthetic basis
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I06

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 肖寒;革命的政治批評(píng)[D];首都師范大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 杜鵑;伊格爾頓的現(xiàn)代悲劇觀研究[D];沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1650159