美何以作為道德的象征——基于語義層面的考察
發(fā)布時間:2019-06-04 23:06
【摘要】:康德對于美和道德之間的關系問題所給出的回答是:"美作為道德的象征",或者說"美的東西是道德的善的東西的象征"。在這里,"美"與"道德"分別作為"美的東西"和"道德的善的東西"二者的抽象名詞經(jīng)由"象征"一詞實現(xiàn)了關系上的聯(lián)結。這種關系的成立建構在康德對于二者的區(qū)分和類比之上:一方面,美和道德有著異質(zhì)性的結構,即前者由感性圖型上升至理念,而后者則由理念規(guī)范感性行動;但另一方面,兩者又存在著可類比性,例如,對于美和道德的判斷都能使人產(chǎn)生愉悅感,等等。因而,康德以"象征"來描述二者的關系至少在語義層面上是成立的。
[Abstract]:Kant's answer to the question of the relationship between beauty and morality is: "Beauty as a symbol of morality," or "the thing of beauty is the symbol of the good of morality." Here, "beauty" and "morality", as abstract nouns of "beautiful thing" and "moral good thing" respectively, are connected by the word "symbol". The establishment of this relationship is based on Kant's distinction and analogy between the two: on the one hand, beauty and morality have heterogeneous structures, that is, the former rises from perceptual graph to concept, while the latter standardizes perceptual action by idea; On the other hand, there is comparability between the two, such as the judgment of beauty and morality can make people happy, and so on. Therefore, Kant uses symbolism to describe the relationship between the two at least at the semantic level.
【作者單位】: 清華大學人文學院哲學系;
【分類號】:B83-0
,
本文編號:2493067
[Abstract]:Kant's answer to the question of the relationship between beauty and morality is: "Beauty as a symbol of morality," or "the thing of beauty is the symbol of the good of morality." Here, "beauty" and "morality", as abstract nouns of "beautiful thing" and "moral good thing" respectively, are connected by the word "symbol". The establishment of this relationship is based on Kant's distinction and analogy between the two: on the one hand, beauty and morality have heterogeneous structures, that is, the former rises from perceptual graph to concept, while the latter standardizes perceptual action by idea; On the other hand, there is comparability between the two, such as the judgment of beauty and morality can make people happy, and so on. Therefore, Kant uses symbolism to describe the relationship between the two at least at the semantic level.
【作者單位】: 清華大學人文學院哲學系;
【分類號】:B83-0
,
本文編號:2493067
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/meixuelunwen/2493067.html