本文選題：本體論 + 實(shí)踐論美學(xué)　； 參考：《學(xué)術(shù)月刊》1997年01期

【摘要】：正署名白耶的通信,是為表明我和尤西林先生《摹狀詞與審美判斷》一文(《學(xué)術(shù)月刊》95年9期)的不同學(xué)術(shù)立場(chǎng)。實(shí)質(zhì)的分歧更為深層,關(guān)系到尤先生既在堅(jiān)持又欲深化的實(shí)踐論美學(xué)的一個(gè)重要哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ),即本體論問題,這點(diǎn)尤先生也意識(shí)到了。但原來簡短的通信不可能談透徹,兼之尤先生答函又做了補(bǔ)充(通信與答函均見《學(xué)術(shù)月刊》96年4期),看來很有必要再作商討,也便于繼續(xù)向尤先生請(qǐng)益。 由于同樣認(rèn)為,論辯必須在學(xué)理層面進(jìn)行,而不該只憑感想或意氣,故而我所論述并不限于表面的見解。又因尤先生坦陳與實(shí)踐論美學(xué)的奠基者之一李澤厚先生在思想上的關(guān)聯(lián),兼
[Abstract]:The correspondence signed by Bai Ye is to show the different academic standpoint of the article "description and Aesthetic judgment" by Mr. Yucillin and me (9 issues of the monthly academic Journal, 1995). The difference of essence is deeper, which is related to one of the important philosophical foundations of the practical aesthetics which Mr. you is insisting on and wants to deepen, namely, the ontological problem, which Mr. you also realizes. However, it was impossible for a brief correspondence to be thorough, and Mr. you's reply was supplemented. (both the correspondence and the reply were published in the fourth issue of the monthly academic Journal in 1996. It seems that it is very necessary to discuss further, and to continue to ask Mr. you for benefit. By the same token, arguments must be conducted on a theoretical level rather than on the basis of feelings or feelings, so I am not limited to superficial opinions. He also admitted to the ideological connection between Mr. Li Zehou, one of the founders of practical aesthetics, and Mr. Li Zehou, one of the founders of practical aesthetics.
【作者單位】： 華東師范大學(xué)中文系
【分類號(hào)】：B83-02

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 黃楠森;論恩格斯的本體論思想[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;1995年03期

2 張弘;試論文藝學(xué)美學(xué)本體論研究的哲學(xué)根據(jù)——兼與于，

本文編號(hào)：1795441